rec.autos.simulators

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

Barton Spencer Brow

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Barton Spencer Brow » Mon, 18 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Ferrari will meet with the FIA in Geneva tomorrow -- Hakkinen's
championship status is neither confirmed or otherwise until Ferrari's
appeal has been heard. The barge boards in question are exactly the same
ones used (and checked by FIA Tech) at the last race (Nrburgring for
the Luxembourg GP). I think Bernie better watch which way he steps on
this one -- the EU is already less than thrilled with his manipulation.

BB

John Walla

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by John Walla » Mon, 18 Oct 1999 04:00:00

On Sun, 17 Oct 1999 16:37:26 -0500, Barton Spencer Brown


>Ferrari will meet with the FIA in Geneva tomorrow -- Hakkinen's
>championship status is neither confirmed or otherwise until Ferrari's
>appeal has been heard. The barge boards in question are exactly the same
>ones used (and checked by FIA Tech) at the last race (Nrburgring for
>the Luxembourg GP). I think Bernie better watch which way he steps on
>this one -- the EU is already less than thrilled with his manipulation.

Excuse me? The boarda re either _legal_ or _illegal_, yes? I watched
Ross Brawn on TV telling everyone that they were illegal, why and by
how much - seems fairly clear cut. Saying that they were used in
Nurburgring and Luxembourg adds only that the Ferrari was illegal at
those tracks as well as Sepang, it doesn't make the car legal.

Cheers!
John

Barton Spencer Brow

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Barton Spencer Brow » Mon, 18 Oct 1999 04:00:00


> So says the Ferrari bigwigs.  Don't believe everything you hear.  Somehow I
> believe this info could be a slight manipulation of the truth on the part of
> the "prancing horse."

> -The Dude?
> Check out The Dude's radio show on 90.9 FM Indianapolis, B91.

Thank the merciful gods that I never have to worry about checking out
The Dude's radio show. Yeah, I'm sure that with a multi-billion-dollar
championship at stake, Todt and Byrne are going to fiddle with 2mm worth
of barge board trailing edge. Fortunately, all speculation is useless,
and will be a moot point after Ferrari's appeal.

BB

Lagwago

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Lagwago » Mon, 18 Oct 1999 04:00:00

All I can say is that if the FIA decides to become biased toward one group
(Ferrari), they are making a big mistake.  Just because it is a big name
doesn't mean that they can go easy on them.  Do you think if a smaller team
won and was found to have the same illegal specs, they should also be let
go?

And speaking of F1...about Eddie Irvine...If he were really a champion
caliber driver, he wouldn't need his big brother holding up the other
drivers and slowing down on the track so that he could win.  Just my
thoughts.  But they really don't matter do they?

J Black


> I hate to say this, I really do, but if the disqualification is upheld
> following the Ferrari appeal, I hope that they withdraw from F1.
> This is not an opinion that I arrive at lightly....not after following
> Grands Prix for almost as long as Murray Walker.  But by turning their
backs
> on F1 Ferrari, in my opinion, could have the greatest effect on the
"sport"
> since that egotistical meglomaniac took control.

> Just the opinion of a once-dedicated F1 fan.



> > Ferrari will meet with the FIA in Geneva tomorrow -- Hakkinen's
> > championship status is neither confirmed or otherwise until Ferrari's
> > appeal has been heard. The barge boards in question are exactly the same
> > ones used (and checked by FIA Tech) at the last race (Nrburgring for
> > the Luxembourg GP). I think Bernie better watch which way he steps on
> > this one -- the EU is already less than thrilled with his manipulation.

> > BB

>   -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
==----------
>    http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
> ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers

==-----
Barton Spencer Brow

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Barton Spencer Brow » Mon, 18 Oct 1999 04:00:00


> I hate to say this, I really do, but if the disqualification is upheld
> following the Ferrari appeal, I hope that they withdraw from F1.
> This is not an opinion that I arrive at lightly....not after following
> Grands Prix for almost as long as Murray Walker.  But by turning their backs
> on F1 Ferrari, in my opinion, could have the greatest effect on the "sport"
> since that egotistical meglomaniac took control.

> Just the opinion of a once-dedicated F1 fan.

Bruce--

I couldn't agree more. This "Championship" has been engineered from the
beginning of the season by that ageing Machiavelli-in-Guccis and his
tousle-haired Son-Of-Oswald crony. If Enzo were alive today, Ecclestone
would be soaking his Armani slacks at this moment -- no, let me take
that back: if Enzo were alive today, this shit wouldn't happen, because
he WOULD pull the team, and FIAT would back him all the way. 20 years
between Championships is -- correct me if I'm wrong -- a record for
Ferrari, and there's no doubt whatsoever that under Ecclestone's
self-imposed reign (since he finally ousted that doddering fossil
Jean-Marie Balestre), British teams have enjoyed a singularly benevolent
shake from FIA, FISA, FOCA, FOA, and every other increasingly grotesque
manifestation of "Bernie Ecclestone LLC." And I hope this finally spurs
the EU to put some teeth in their investigations. This is a black day
for F1 fans. If this isn't overturned, I hope the twin megalomaniacs
Tony George and Bernard Ecclestone meet for the 2000 USGP and are torn
apart by the mob of 150 or so that will turn up.

That's it for F1 -- GPL is more than a memory of great cars, drivers,
and tracks -- it's also a reminder that there once was a sport called
Formula One...long since departed, alas.

BB

Barton Spencer Brow

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Barton Spencer Brow » Mon, 18 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Sorry, John -- I saw the Brawn statement, too -- and while he seemed to
fumble with his words, I didn't get the same message you did from what
he said. But it doesn't matter what you or I think -- what matters is
what happens in Geneva tomorrow, no?

BB

Daniel Thorp

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Daniel Thorp » Mon, 18 Oct 1999 04:00:00

I'm sensing a bit of bitterness in this thread about Ferrari being
disqualified - something I really couldn't care less about. The racing team
of the magnificent Gilles V. vanished years ago. Its place has been taken by
an organization as corporate and soul-less as any of the other mega-buck
teams. And neither the excessively mouthy Eddie Irvine nor
crash-em-out-if-you-can't-beat-'em Schumacher are my idea of a world
champion.

As for Ferrari always getting the short end of the stick from the
organisers - it seems to me the machiavellian Ecclestone has manipulated in
their favour more than often than not. Refuelling was brought in when the
Ferrari V12 was the thirstiest engine in the field (the others had already
gone to V10s) and would benefit the most from not having to carry a whole
race's worth of benzine. After a couple years of pit fires, near disasters,
and lugging those bulky, dangerous, pressurized rigs around the world most
teams had had enough, but Ferrari's continuing veto has kept the ridiculous
practice alive. There are other examples...

But yeah, any championship is in trouble that gets decided like this. What
is so ambiguous about the technical rules that bodywork could be found legal
at two races (so Ferrari says...) and declared illegal by a third set of
inspectors? Maybe if Bernie and his pet poodle Mosley took a break from
screwing up the TV coverage in order to force us into pay-per view and
instead spent some time writing technical regulations that actually made
sense and produced cars that could race ("racing cars" - geddit?) instead of
the current ugly, skinny, grooved-tire monstrosities, the on track
activities could actually decide the championship.

Until then I'll go back to GPL - and return to a time when F1 was a sport,
the drivers were human beings, and the races were won on the track.

Daniel

PS: remove "zapspam" from my e-mail address to reply.




> > I hate to say this, I really do, but if the disqualification is upheld
> > following the Ferrari appeal, I hope that they withdraw from F1.
> > This is not an opinion that I arrive at lightly....not after following
> > Grands Prix for almost as long as Murray Walker.  But by turning their
backs
> > on F1 Ferrari, in my opinion, could have the greatest effect on the
"sport"
> > since that egotistical meglomaniac took control.

> > Just the opinion of a once-dedicated F1 fan.

Kenny L

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Kenny L » Mon, 18 Oct 1999 04:00:00

<snip>

watching a replay of an online GPL race about two months ago... :)

markgam

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by markgam » Tue, 19 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Lastest statement from Jean Todt affirms that Ferrari does agree the
boards were not in legal spec, but he thinks that since there was not a
conscious effort to cheat nor any advantage gained, that the penalty is
too severe. The techincal director of Jordan has stated in his opinion
that the boards would not have provided any benefit. There are
precedents for allowing unintentional violations with no benefits to be
ignored. And I think that for the good of the sport the FIA needs to be
flexible.

I don't know how F1 does their pre-race tech inspection, but it would
seem that something in plain view would have been caught. After the race
scrutinering may be correct by the rules, but it leaves a bad taste in
the mouth of the fans.

The FIA court doesn't meet till Friday, and then it might be a few days
till they rule. I hope they reinstate Ferrari's win, because it will
make for a great race at Suzuka!!



> On Sun, 17 Oct 1999 16:37:26 -0500, Barton Spencer Brown

> >Ferrari will meet with the FIA in Geneva tomorrow -- Hakkinen's
> >championship status is neither confirmed or otherwise until Ferrari's
> >appeal has been heard. The barge boards in question are exactly the
same
> >ones used (and checked by FIA Tech) at the last race (Nrburgring for
> >the Luxembourg GP). I think Bernie better watch which way he steps on
> >this one -- the EU is already less than thrilled with his
manipulation.

> Excuse me? The boarda re either _legal_ or _illegal_, yes? I watched
> Ross Brawn on TV telling everyone that they were illegal, why and by
> how much - seems fairly clear cut. Saying that they were used in
> Nurburgring and Luxembourg adds only that the Ferrari was illegal at
> those tracks as well as Sepang, it doesn't make the car legal.

> Cheers!
> John

--

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

The Du

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by The Du » Tue, 19 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Good thing.  We go after the type of listener who has an IQ above their shoe
size.

You'd be surprised...  Either way, no matter if they were used last race or
not, or if they give an advantage, if the rules say not to use them, than you
don't.  Thank the merciful gods that Ferrari hasn't yet won the championship.
I haven't respected a Ferrari driver since GV in '82.

-The Dude?
Check out The Dude's radio show on 90.9 FM Indianapolis, B91.

Schlom

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Schlom » Tue, 19 Oct 1999 04:00:00

The thing i dont get is theyve obviously been using the same thing all thru
practice and qualifying...why didnt they catch the infraction then?  I sure
hope the FIA over turns the (bullshit) ruling and Irvines victory stands.  I
think maybe the fact Ron Dennis was shittin kittens (or so i heard) after the
race might have had something to do with this.

Chris

hamme..

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by hamme.. » Tue, 19 Oct 1999 04:00:00

It was 10mm in error, not 2mm, but BS all the same.

I am in the camp of many that believe Ron Dennis knew about this since
Nurburgring (or before), and simply chose to wait for the most
beneficial time for McLaren to snitch to the FIA about it.  I'm not a
*** type of guy... but when the shoe fits, it's pretty obvious
(to me).

I also believe the FIA circus scrutinizers have an implicit obligation
to share with any team the results of FIA scrutinization of that teams
car.  I find it reprehensible the FIA needed McLaren to point out the
problem for them :(  (if indeed that is the case, which I believe it
is).

I also believe Dennis' feigned sad feelings at the result of the DQ are
a sham for PR purposes only.  That's just my opinion.  I think the guy
is a 2-bit fish.

Rules are rules.  If Ferrari is DQ'd, I find the circumstances rather
despicable, but facts are facts and rules are rules and must be
followed.  It will be a sad, sad day in my world if the DQ stands up,
which I believe it will :(  Such is life.

Anyway you look at it, though, I think this whole is bad for F1 on the
whole.  How the FIA scrutinized the Scuderia over two race events and
never once checked the barge boards is unforgiveable IMO.

Bottom line, though, it was Ferrari's responsibility to adhere to the
rules, and they failed to do so.  If the DQ is upheld, Todt has nobody
to blame but himself, regardless of how rediculously harsh the penalty
is, IMO.

Interesting weekend to be sure :(  Schumacher was brilliant beyond
words... how people continue to disrespect this guy is beyond me.  He's
obnoxious and arrogant to be sure... to the extreme... but he is
obviously THE BEST pilot on the planet right now.  How he covers the
McLarens by nearly 1 full second in qualifying is beyond me... Mika and
David must feel like morons, driving the best car on the planet but a
full second adrift of the master.  How long has it been since a non-
winner of a race so completely dominated the entire race in every way?

Hammer

Sent via Deja.com http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Before you buy.

Ray

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Ray » Tue, 19 Oct 1999 04:00:00

What are barge boards?
Mart Hugh Roger

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Mart Hugh Roger » Tue, 19 Oct 1999 04:00:00



You are getting yourself all carried away here.  Policies and rules
exist and should be implemented with the same objectivity for a Ferrari
as for a Minardi.  If a team have broken the rules then they should take
the pain for it.  

Yes it would be a huge blow for F1 if Ferrari are disqualified, but that
has nothing to do with the issue at hand.  You are confusing the two
issues.

Mart
--
Mart Hugh Rogers

Zonk

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Zonk » Tue, 19 Oct 1999 04:00:00

B

Um, i hate to point this out, but when you design and engine cars to 1000th's
of a mm accuracy, 10mm out is a *** of a long way to happen on "accident" or
without malace. They deserve the disqualification.

Z.

Please remove my_pants when replying.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.