rec.autos.simulators

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Richard, pushing the rules to the nth. degree has always existed but
"cheating" really only became more frequent after the commercialisation of
the sport, I'm afraid.  As the commercial interests became greater, so the
elevl of good sportsmanship dropped.

So from around the beginning of the 1970s onwards F1 began to decompose in
that respect.




> : My disappointment, Mr. Black, stems from the complete lack of
sportsmanship
> : that now epitomises F1.

>   C'mon Bruce - I thought you _remembered_ the old days of F1.  In the 70s
> and 80s you could play "spot the cheat".  Or how about playing "which
> teams used the following cheats":

>   Overly tall car and a nail covertly inserted into the tyre after the
> race to get it under the scrutineers ruler.

>   Underweight car and special "lead lined" engine cover put in place
> for scrutineering.

>   "Water cooled" brakes which happened to loose all that heavy water at
> some point during the race (allowing the car to run underweight).

>   Covert flip of a bit of paper across the electronic eye to shave a
> few tenths off a qualifying time.

>   I'm sure that when you think back you can come up with your own.

>   Formula One has _always_ had its politics and its dodgy dealings -
> it's just that we think of the older ones as "the whacky exploits
> they used to get away with" and the newer ones as "that scandal which
> would never have happened in the old days.

>   I don't know enough about the 60s to comment but do you really believe
> that the 70s and 80s were more sporting?

> --
> Richard G. Clegg       Only the mind is waving
>     Networks and Non-Linear Dynamics Group
>       Dept. of Mathematics, Uni. of York
>     www:  http://www.racesimcentral.net/

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.racesimcentral.net/       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Very true.....I'd missed that point!




> > I tried to check it out from Oz with my little short-wave radio but the
> > atmospherics were playing up and the best I could get was Radio Caracas.
I
> > believe it's just as good.

> Better, since it comes from a civilized country with an understandable
language...

> ;^)

> BB

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

(snip)
It's a _very_ unsatisfactory way to end the race and the season, but
I'd have no respect for F1 if they failed to DQ Ferrari.
(unsnip)

I've had no respect for F1 for years, John, so a failure to disqualify would
mean little.


> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 21:49:27 +1000, "Bruce Kennewell"

> >I beg your pardon, and please excuse my apoplectic fit, but it's about
time
> >that the FIA, and their cronies, *REMOVED* the negative bias that they
have
> >directed towards Ferrari over the past 30 years.

> I'd love to hear examples of that - if anything the FIA have bent over
> backwards to keep Ferrari happy. Remember the "Draconian penalties"
> for anyone caught infringing the rules? Oh, except Ferrari....

> >As for your mistaken assertion regarding one member of Ferrari being a
> >mobile chicane in order to allow the other an easier run, I seem to
recall
> >the situation being reveresd, where Irvine assisted Schumacher in at
least
> >one race. I also recalll Coulthard attempting to try it this year as
well.

> Coulthard has been racing Hakkinen all year - no way would he be
> holding up a Ferrari while Mika got away as Mika would be getting away
> rom him as well.

> >You are overlooking the fact that Messrs Moseley and Ecclestone, Denis
and
> >Hakkinen cannot have their cake and eat it too.  Formula Once (deliberate
> >spelling) is a team sport.....there must be two cars and the teams vie
for a
> >Manufacturers Championship each season.  Therefore team tactics are
> >perfectly acceptable.

> I like the team tactics aspect, but it can be taken too far - cycle
> racing and rugby union a faw years back being examples of where team
> tactics designed to win detract from the reason the sport existed in
> the first place, to entertain. FWIW I don't subscribe to the Ron
> Dennis view that Sepang was too much - I thought Schumacher drove
> superbly and if DC can pass Mika should be able to also. In fact my
> wife, who normally hates F1, was enthralled by the whole race - EI
> worried by DC who has nothing to lose, MH similarly worried by MS. DC
> passes MS wildly, chasing EI to pressure him into an error, or lunge a
> pass (which EI must concede to) then slow EI to bring him into range
> of the MS/MH battle - ripping stuff :-)

> >My disappointment, Mr. Black, stems from the complete lack of
sportsmanship
> >that now epitomises F1.  This latest example, where a protest is lodged
over
> >10mm of carbon fibre when the protesting team were soundly and
convincingly
> >beaten by the better team tactics on the day, is simply one occasion in a
> >whole string of them.

> That is not true - the illegality of the car was discovered by the
> stewards without neither the intervention nor protest from McLaren.

> >Ten millimetres of carbon fibre did not beat McLaren.
> >Ferrari could have removed the barge-boards and still Coulthard and
Hakkinen
> >would have still been up against it.

> Probably, but we don't know that. Illegal is illegal, that's why the
> rules exist. Suppose that an aero improvement brings big benefits, the
> more area the better - how much over the regulations are you allowed -
> 1mm? 5mm? 10mm? The answer is 0mm, that's why the rules exist. With a
> budget of $100m+ if Ferrari can't find an irregularity on a car they
> designed but which a steward spotted in a post-race check, they can
> hardly point the finger at anyone.

> It's a _very_ unsatisfactory way to end the race and the season, but
> I'd have no respect for F1 if they failed to DQ Ferrari.

> Cheers!
> John

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Thanks for the correction, Goy.  I was unaware of that fact (the routine
inspection) although we had been made aware of the likelihood of McLaren
protesting the used tyres.



> > My disappointment, Mr. Black, stems from the complete lack of
sportsmanship
> > that now epitomises F1.  This latest example, where a protest is lodged
over
> > 10mm of carbon fibre when the protesting team were soundly and
convincingly
> > beaten by the better team tactics on the day, is simply one occasion in
a
> > whole string of them. Ten millimetres of carbon fibre did not beat
McLaren.
> > Ferrari could have removed the barge-boards and still Coulthard and
Hakkinen
> > would have still been up against it.

> Just for the record Bruce, according to Autosport, the "illegal"
> bargeboards was discovered in a routine post race inspection and not
> because of a protest lodged by any other team, although McLaren was
> thinking about protesting the tyre wear on the Ferrari's, apparently
> they had worn below the required minimum thread height, nice to have all
> these rules that are so easy to police .......

> --

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/
> "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

I don't look for _anything_ in contemporary F1, Richard.  The whole box and
dice is a fiasco.
My motor-racing _e***ment_now comes from attending historic racing
meetings.





> :>
> :>   Luxembourg GP this year.

> : Jesus!  Well, if *that* made your heart beat fast, Richard, get on down
to
> : your doctor and have a check-up *really* quickly!!

>   (Grin) Well, what do _you_ look for in a race Bruce?  That had passing
> for the lead and for major positions, crashing out of the lead, weather
> effects and mechanical failure.  What are _you_ looking for in a race?
> 70% drop out through mechanical failure and the winner 2 minutes ahead
> like in the 60s?

> --
> Richard G. Clegg       Only the mind is waving
>     Networks and Non-Linear Dynamics Group
>       Dept. of Mathematics, Uni. of York
>     www:  http://www.racesimcentral.net/

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.racesimcentral.net/       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

I was waiting for the bloke at the back to open the boot and get the spare
out!!


  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----

Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Oh, sorry........I should have said that I don't!!  But it's difficult to
prevent the networks giving information in the sports section of the news.

Once again....I do apologise.


> Don't watch it then.



> > Formula One........a time when a privateer could compete on equal terms
> with
> > the manufacturers.  A time when laughter was more common in pit lane
than
> > grumbles.  A time when a team in trouble and requiring a part would have
> it
> > loaned by a rival.  A time when the drivers socialised before and after
> the
> > races.  A time when losing a race was done so graciously.  A time when
> > winning was done with equal grace
> > .
> > Formula One.......a time when it was a sport in the purest sense of the
> > word.




> > > > I hate to say this, I really do, but if the disqualification is
upheld
> > > > following the Ferrari appeal, I hope that they withdraw from F1.
> > > > This is not an opinion that I arrive at lightly....not after
following
> > > > Grands Prix for almost as long as Murray Walker.  But by turning
their
> > backs
> > > > on F1 Ferrari, in my opinion, could have the greatest effect on the
> > "sport"
> > > > since that egotistical meglomaniac took control.

> > > > Just the opinion of a once-dedicated F1 fan.

> > > Bruce--

> > > I couldn't agree more. This "Championship" has been engineered from
the
> > > beginning of the season by that ageing Machiavelli-in-Guccis and his
> > > tousle-haired Son-Of-Oswald crony. If Enzo were alive today,
Ecclestone
> > > would be soaking his Armani slacks at this moment -- no, let me take
> > > that back: if Enzo were alive today, this shit wouldn't happen,
because
> > > he WOULD pull the team, and FIAT would back him all the way. 20 years
> > > between Championships is -- correct me if I'm wrong -- a record for
> > > Ferrari, and there's no doubt whatsoever that under Ecclestone's
> > > self-imposed reign (since he finally ousted that doddering fossil
> > > Jean-Marie Balestre), British teams have enjoyed a singularly
benevolent
> > > shake from FIA, FISA, FOCA, FOA, and every other increasingly
grotesque
> > > manifestation of "Bernie Ecclestone LLC." And I hope this finally
spurs
> > > the EU to put some teeth in their investigations. This is a black day
> > > for F1 fans. If this isn't overturned, I hope the twin megalomaniacs
> > > Tony George and Bernard Ecclestone meet for the 2000 USGP and are torn
> > > apart by the mob of 150 or so that will turn up.

> > > That's it for F1 -- GPL is more than a memory of great cars, drivers,
> > > and tracks -- it's also a reminder that there once was a sport called
> > > Formula One...long since departed, alas.

> > > BB

> >   -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
> ==----------
> >    http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the
World!
> > ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers
> ==-----

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Antti Markus Pete

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Antti Markus Pete » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00


Salo assisted Irvine at Spa when he was asked by the team to hold back
Ralf Schumacher (that really made Williams and Head lose their cool) but
other than that, we haven't seen anyone employ these kind of tactics this
season, that is, before Malaysia. Unsurprisingly, it was once again
Ferrari.

Schumacher admittedly drove a brilliant race, being able to control
Hakkinen by fluctuating his speed, lifting in high speed corners and
immediately accelerating away while MH couldn't afford to take a risk of
being put out of race with Irvine in lead. MS was certainly *** in
Malaysia, while the team's strategy was... um, less sporty. Not illegal
though, like everyone knows. But Ferrari is hardly even a m***winner
here.

No protest. The officials discovered a rule infringement. Don't blame Mc
for that. Unless you're one of *** theorists wearing red shades.
I suppose we'll always have to suffer from some lack of sportsmanship
when big buckz are in the picture. Just remember that you're talking
about a quality which Ferrari itself is not very famous of.

I can see your frustration but are you REALLY such an expert in F1
aerodynamics that you can tell what kind of effect those modified barge
boards actually had. For sure their shape was based on wind tunnel
testing and not some fractal landscape generator.

From formula1.com:

Ferrari may have claimed that on this section of the car even a
discrepancy of 10mm on a deflector would have no performance enhancing
effect but according to Dr. Kevin Garry of the Cranfield Institute in the
UK, where many teams come to develop their aerodynamic packages at it's
College of Aeronautics, even the smallest of changes can have very
pronounced effects:

"There can be huge aero effects from something as small as a 1 or 2
millimetre discrepancy. Small changes can severely effect the separation
of air downstream of the part and it may well induce a spiralling of the
airflow known as vortex which can have profound implications for the
airflow over the bodywork behind the part in question".

Joao Sil

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Joao Sil » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00




>>In the end it's the fans who lose and they've turned Suzuka into a race that
>>is meaningless.

>"They" presumably being Ferrari? The FIA officials did their job,
>nothing more nor less.

>Cheers!
>John

Yes definitely Ferrari, but I do also partly blame the FIA for lack of
inspection in the previous races or even qualifying and practice sessions.

I think that the cars could be scrutinized much more closely by the FIA.
Close and frequent inspection of the cars, perhaps right on the morning
before the race followed by Parque Ferme would really encourage all the
teams not to even try any shady modifications and prevent future situations
where an illegal car can enter the race and even win it only to have the
entire results be disallowed after the fans went home and celebrated the
results. It would be much better to have the infraction discovered and their
qualifying time be disallowed.

I agree that the rules must be upheld but the way they are being enforced
after the race allows for these type of snafus and disappointments for the
fans.

But like you say, this would not have happened if Ferrari had done the right
thing (whether that be not cheating or in just case this was an oversight
they should have verified that parts on the cars are manufactured according
to the rules.)

And yes, I am a very disappointed Tifosi, both that Ferrari would try to
cheat, or if they did not that they allowed a manufacturing oversight
to ruin a possible championship, in both cases it is utter stupidity on their
part.

Seeyas on the track.

--John (Joao) Silva

GPL Ferrari driver.
Powerslide Racing Team  - GMSS  League F1 division.
Rossi Razzi Racing Team - IGPLC League F2 division.

Matthew B. P. Knutse

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Matthew B. P. Knutse » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00


> Richard, pushing the rules to the nth. degree has always existed but
> "cheating" really only became more frequent after the commercialisation of
> the sport, I'm afraid.  As the commercial interests became greater, so the
> elevl of good sportsmanship dropped.

> So from around the beginning of the 1970s onwards F1 began to decompose in
> that respect.

Can you say "Flavio Briatore"? That about sums F1 up for me now. Yea, I know he's
"out", but honestly......
Yuk!!!!!!!!!
:-)

Matt

--
----------------------
The GPL Preservation Society
http://www.gpl.netti.nu
http://KOTR.de/gpl

**GPLEA Member**

Liutger Franze

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Liutger Franze » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

I heard that the complaining team was Stewart not McLaren. or am I
wrong?

Lio

mark jeangerar

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by mark jeangerar » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00


> Interesting weekend to be sure :(  Schumacher was brilliant beyond
> words... how people continue to disrespect this guy is beyond me.  He's
> obnoxious and arrogant to be sure... to the extreme... but he is
> obviously THE BEST pilot on the planet right now.  How he covers the
> McLarens by nearly 1 full second in qualifying is beyond me... Mika and
> David must feel like morons, driving the best car on the planet but a
> full second adrift of the master.  How long has it been since a non-
> winner of a race so completely dominated the entire race in every way?

> Hammer

Well, obviously, it was that 10mm of board that allowed him to be so fast.

--

Mark Jeangerard
www.soundchaserweb.com
New Mexico USA

mark jeangerar

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by mark jeangerar » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

That is a really good point! Now that I think about it, that would have been
a major factor in my watching F1. My heart really did beat fast watching
them race ON TV! Not to mention track side. Those guys were at it. 100%. I
guess that's also the factor in my failure to follow F1. The heart rate
dropped. Nothing there for me.

--
Mark Jeangerard
www.soundchaserweb.com
New Mexico USA


Steve Ferguso

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Steve Ferguso » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00


: And the relevance to what I said is...? My comment on Hunt concerned his
: largely unsponsored year with Hesketh, not his fluke championship year
: with McLaren -- a Championship that was morally Niki Lauda's. If you're

If those are the requirements for a fluke championship, then there are
others that fit the bill.  Throw Rosberg's '82 championship up there as
well, perhaps.  Unfortunately Lauda crashed, either through his error or a
car failure (I don't know, I was too young) and it cost him several races.
A simple fact.  Then he fought back courageously, which is also a fact.
that he did not attain the WC that year diminishes his efforts and heroism
in no way for me, nor does it diminish JH's achievement in getting the WC
that year.  I wouldn't bring the concept of "morals" into discussion of a
WC.  hunt sealed the championship because he was wither braver, or
more foolhardy, to continue in the appalling conditions of Fuji.  Both are
qualities I somehow admired in a driver.  Villeneuve (Sr. or Jr.) also fit
the bill.  If anything, Hunt "morally" deserved a WC for being one of the
few "characters" in F1.

Stephen

Steve Ferguso

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Steve Ferguso » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00


:>I disagree.
:>Formula 1 without Ferrari would no longer be Formula 1.

: For some - I could live without them, they're simply another team.
: They were certainly an institution once, but that reputation has long
: since faded. It is kept alive in the dreams of the Tifosi, but that is
: all.

Same for me.  Any team with a budget exceeding 200 million USD who can't
afford to hire a few quality control personnel and use them properly is
strictly amateur.  If you get a carbon fibre panel wrong by 10mm in the
aerospace industry, you throw it in the bin.  With all the design work
done on computers now, there is no way a proposed part should slip past a
"virtual" template at the design stage, nor past a quality check after
production.

Stephen


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.