rec.autos.simulators

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

John Walla

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by John Walla » Fri, 22 Oct 1999 04:00:00


>If you'd bother to read more about it, every team in F1 on record about
>the issue states it's NO ADVANTAGE.

>Are you ignorant?  Or just uninformed?

I don't know, are you? Or perhaps just rude?

Let me quote one Mr. Edde Irvine talking specifically about the new
barge boards (I am presuming he would know more than you, but I'm sure
you'll dispute that...)

"We pretty much had the car as in the Nurburgring, I could quite
easily have put the car on pole [in the Nurburgring] if I had put a
lap together. Here [Sepang] was the first time we showed it. In
testing before Nurburgring we went backwards a little bit, but we
tested after that and understood what we had done wrong. AS YOU CAN
SEE, IT'S A BIG STEP FORWARD".

Is that okay, or would neon and skywriting be clearer?

Cheers!
John

Barton Spencer Brow

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Barton Spencer Brow » Fri, 22 Oct 1999 04:00:00


> but the Championship is still open
> for Michael to bring back to Ferrari after all these years and be the
> complete "Golden Boy". It all seems too perfect - I wonder what his secret
> desires are for the outcome tomorrow?

> Tony

Fascinating, isn't it? Whatever happens, the more and more public
exposition of Jean Todt's agenda can't do much for his job security.
That's the other side of the "soulless corporation" coin, though: when
Enzo was alive, he would support the most boneheaded team managers
(Eugenio Dragoni comes immediately to mind), ultimately to the Maranello
team's sorrow. Historically, FIAT's corporate subsidisation of Ferrari
has always, as a gentleman's agree between the Agnelli and Ferrari
families, been very "hands-off"... but commercial pressures that Ferrari
in his heyday could ignore with imperial hauteur are a very different
proposition to the modern incarnation known as "Scuderia Ferrari
Marlboro." While FIAT guards (at a safe and low profile remove) Ferrari
as the Italian National Treasure it most certainly is, Marlboro --
already under consumer pressures of its own -- cannot afford to alienate
the public. And as much as the tifosi love high opera, treason in high
places -- and to the tifosi, Maranello ranks somewhere above the Vatican
-- must be dealt with severely and decisively...which could very well
prove to be very bad news for Todt. What a prophetic name!

Bart

Barton Spencer Brow

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Barton Spencer Brow » Fri, 22 Oct 1999 04:00:00


> Seeing as how Todt could very well lose his job over all this, it makes no sense to me
> that he would have any part in this.

> Dave

Perhaps...but then, in matters at this public level, appearances are
unfortunately often more persuasive than facts. Should Todt fall over
this, it would hardly be the first time such a thing had happened, nor
Ferrari the first team to fall to such pressures. Even DiMontezemolo has
been in and out the door at Maranello more than once...

BB

Marko Viitane

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Marko Viitane » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Yeah, but what a wonderful *** his was!  my favourite driver for sure :)

The Dude kirjoitti viestiss?

>>So you didn't have respect for Alain Prost or Nigel Mansell, or.. ?

>I never like Prost after his "incidents" with Senna, and Nigel always
seemed to

>-The Dude?
>Check out The Dude's radio show on 90.9 FM Indianapolis, B91.

Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00

LOL!!
We are going into print just as soon as possible, Goy.



> > (The saga is continued below!!!).......




> > > > (snip)
> > > > It all started innocently enough with a backyard sauna...
> > > > (unsnip)
> > > > There I was, 250 pounds of sweating pork-chops and sucking on a
Schlitz,
> > > > when the pinewood door creaked on its hinges, the steam parted as
the
> > cold
> > > > desert air rushed in and there _she_ stood........

> > > In nothing but a flimsy burnoose and a pickelhaube...and then it
struck
> > > me (THUD!)...what a sap she had!

> > ........and what a sap I was for believing her when she had told me, the
> > previous night under the heaving softness of her goose-down doona, that
it
> > was I that she had the hots for and _not_ Zebediah, the club-footed
dwarfish
> > henchman of Doctor Ng, the maniacal Vietnamese warlord with offices in
New
> > York, Paris, London and Berlin.

> You guys scare me.................

> --

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/
> "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Now that Viagra is here.....indefinitely, Bart.

Ooops!  You were talking about the story......!!!



> Gad! Do you know how long we could keep this up?

> BB


> > (The saga is continued below!!!).......

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00

David, think back to when Surtees had his legs chopped from under him.....at
what proved to be the expense of Ferraris fortunes at that time (that same
season I think).
The chopping was started by the Team Manager, a pinch-faced bloke whose name
is on the tip of my tongue and who hated Surtees guts with a vengeance.

History repeats.



> > The manufactured drama continues. To understand the full odiferousness
> > of these stories you must first understand that Michael Schumacher is
> > Jean Todt's "Golden Boy," and that Todt rabidly and publicly dislikes
> > Eddie Irvine, perhaps to the point where he would allow Ferrari to lose
> > both Championships rather than have Irvine be the first to win the
> > titles for Ferrari in 20 years. The "where's the missing wheel?" pitstop
> > fiasco has for some weeks been rumored to have been Jean Todt's way of
> > keeping Irvine away from a firm grasp on the Championship, Todt at that
> > time believing that a newly-fit Schumacher would make it back in time to
> > wrestle his points lead back. Read on, if you dare -- or care:

> Jean Todt's preference for Schumacher over Irvine is certainly true, but I
seriously
> doubt that he would sabotage Irvine in this manner.  The missing tire
pitstop was just
> a result of Salo making an unexpected stop when Irvine's tires were
already set out
> for him.  When Salo came in, they had to quickly discard Irvine's tires
and get
> Salo's, and one of Irvine's tires was misplaced in the confusion.

> Also, the missing wheel fiasco was in the previous race (at Nurburgring).
Schumacher
> was already mathematically eliminated and had no chance of "wrestling his
points lead
> back".

> Seeing as how Todt could very well lose his job over all this, it makes no
sense to me
> that he would have any part in this.

> Dave

> *****************************************************
> David A. Ewing

> *****************************************************

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Mark Seer

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Mark Seer » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00

That would be Mr Dragoni Bruce. And appropriate name wouldn't you agree <G>
I remember that he chopped Surtees in 1966, a xenophobic move to get his
countryman Bandini into the team. He cited Surtee's outspoken criticisms of
the v12 engines lack of power as the reason why he had to go.

We all know that it is a cardinal sin for a driver to speak badly of the red
one. Ask Mr Prost.

Mark

> David, think back to when Surtees had his legs chopped from under
him.....at
> what proved to be the expense of Ferraris fortunes at that time (that same
> season I think).
> The chopping was started by the Team Manager, a pinch-faced bloke whose
name
> is on the tip of my tongue and who hated Surtees guts with a vengeance.

> History repeats.




> > > The manufactured drama continues. To understand the full odiferousness
> > > of these stories you must first understand that Michael Schumacher is
> > > Jean Todt's "Golden Boy," and that Todt rabidly and publicly dislikes
> > > Eddie Irvine, perhaps to the point where he would allow Ferrari to
lose
> > > both Championships rather than have Irvine be the first to win the
> > > titles for Ferrari in 20 years. The "where's the missing wheel?"
pitstop
> > > fiasco has for some weeks been rumored to have been Jean Todt's way of
> > > keeping Irvine away from a firm grasp on the Championship, Todt at
that
> > > time believing that a newly-fit Schumacher would make it back in time
to
> > > wrestle his points lead back. Read on, if you dare -- or care:

> > Jean Todt's preference for Schumacher over Irvine is certainly true, but
I
> seriously
> > doubt that he would sabotage Irvine in this manner.  The missing tire
> pitstop was just
> > a result of Salo making an unexpected stop when Irvine's tires were
> already set out
> > for him.  When Salo came in, they had to quickly discard Irvine's tires
> and get
> > Salo's, and one of Irvine's tires was misplaced in the confusion.

> > Also, the missing wheel fiasco was in the previous race (at
Nurburgring).
> Schumacher
> > was already mathematically eliminated and had no chance of "wrestling
his
> points lead
> > back".

> > Seeing as how Todt could very well lose his job over all this, it makes
no
> sense to me
> > that he would have any part in this.

> > Dave

> > *****************************************************
> > David A. Ewing

> > *****************************************************

>   -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
==----------
>    http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
> ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers

==-----
Ronald Stoeh

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Ronald Stoeh » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00


snip

> Let me quote one Mr. Edde Irvine talking specifically about the new
> barge boards (I am presuming he would know more than you, but I'm sure
> you'll dispute that...)

> "We pretty much had the car as in the Nurburgring, I could quite
> easily have put the car on pole [in the Nurburgring] if I had put a
> lap together. Here [Sepang] was the first time we showed it. In
> testing before Nurburgring we went backwards a little bit, but we
> tested after that and understood what we had done wrong. AS YOU CAN
> SEE, IT'S A BIG STEP FORWARD".

I doubt, EI was talking about the barge boards here, just about the
improved car in total. The chief engineer from Minardi said in an
interview that those 10mm would do nothing (at most 0.1s) to help
the performance of the car.

Do you believe Eddie, or do you believe an engineer...?

l8er
ronny

--
"I heard if you play the NT-4.0-CD backwards, you get a satanic
message."
"That's nothing, if you play it forward, it installs NT-4.0"

Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00

That's the lad!  Yes....Dragoni.  Thanks, Mark.


> That would be Mr Dragoni Bruce. And appropriate name wouldn't you agree
<G>
> I remember that he chopped Surtees in 1966, a xenophobic move to get his
> countryman Bandini into the team. He cited Surtee's outspoken criticisms
of
> the v12 engines lack of power as the reason why he had to go.

> We all know that it is a cardinal sin for a driver to speak badly of the
red
> one. Ask Mr Prost.

> Mark


> > David, think back to when Surtees had his legs chopped from under
> him.....at
> > what proved to be the expense of Ferraris fortunes at that time (that
same
> > season I think).
> > The chopping was started by the Team Manager, a pinch-faced bloke whose
> name
> > is on the tip of my tongue and who hated Surtees guts with a vengeance.

> > History repeats.




> > > > The manufactured drama continues. To understand the full
odiferousness
> > > > of these stories you must first understand that Michael Schumacher
is
> > > > Jean Todt's "Golden Boy," and that Todt rabidly and publicly
dislikes
> > > > Eddie Irvine, perhaps to the point where he would allow Ferrari to
> lose
> > > > both Championships rather than have Irvine be the first to win the
> > > > titles for Ferrari in 20 years. The "where's the missing wheel?"
> pitstop
> > > > fiasco has for some weeks been rumored to have been Jean Todt's way
of
> > > > keeping Irvine away from a firm grasp on the Championship, Todt at
> that
> > > > time believing that a newly-fit Schumacher would make it back in
time
> to
> > > > wrestle his points lead back. Read on, if you dare -- or care:

> > > Jean Todt's preference for Schumacher over Irvine is certainly true,
but
> I
> > seriously
> > > doubt that he would sabotage Irvine in this manner.  The missing tire
> > pitstop was just
> > > a result of Salo making an unexpected stop when Irvine's tires were
> > already set out
> > > for him.  When Salo came in, they had to quickly discard Irvine's
tires
> > and get
> > > Salo's, and one of Irvine's tires was misplaced in the confusion.

> > > Also, the missing wheel fiasco was in the previous race (at
> Nurburgring).
> > Schumacher
> > > was already mathematically eliminated and had no chance of "wrestling
> his
> > points lead
> > > back".

> > > Seeing as how Todt could very well lose his job over all this, it
makes
> no
> > sense to me
> > > that he would have any part in this.

> > > Dave

> > > *****************************************************
> > > David A. Ewing

> > > *****************************************************

> >   -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
> ==----------
> >    http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the
World!
> > ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers
> ==-----

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
John Walla

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by John Walla » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00

On Fri, 22 Oct 1999 12:34:32 +0200, Ronald Stoehr


>I doubt, EI was talking about the barge boards here, just about the
>improved car in total. The chief engineer from Minardi said in an
>interview that those 10mm would do nothing (at most 0.1s) to help
>the performance of the car.

As I mentioned at the start of my message, that was a quote from Eddie
talking about the barge boards. I'm sure you're right, the chief
engineer of Minardi will be better informed....

That _has_ to be rhetorical? Do I believe the guy who was driving the
car, testing the car, involved in the setup and all the team meetings
and strategy decisions, or do I believe someone from the back of the
grid who saw the car in the pit-lane?

Frankly I believe neither, but I put a lot more faith in Eddie's words
than the engineers.

Cheers!
John

hamme..

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by hamme.. » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00



> I don't know, are you? Or perhaps just rude?

Yes I was rude, and idiotic, and I apologized.  Want to kick me around
some more??

I do not dispute that, nice sarcasm there :)  My information comes from
the numerous articles at AtlasF1 where it's clearly stated by the
designer at Jordan and at Mindardi that it is widely accepted there is
(in Gascoyne's words) "no measurable advantage".  I choose to believe
what they are saying.  If you do not, we'll just disagree.

I deserved that.

Cheers.  You are of course quite correct, there was a complete and
massive advantage for those no good Ferrari cheaters, and they won the
race on advantages represented in 1cm of carbon fiber missing on each
side of the car.  Just think of the weight advantage they achieved!!!!
:)

You are right.  I am wrong.  Have a great day.

Hammer

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Goy Larse

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Goy Larse » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00


> That would be Mr Dragoni Bruce. And appropriate name wouldn't you agree <G>
> I remember that he chopped Surtees in 1966, a xenophobic move to get his
> countryman Bandini into the team. He cited Surtee's outspoken criticisms of
> the v12 engines lack of power as the reason why he had to go.

> We all know that it is a cardinal sin for a driver to speak badly of the red
> one. Ask Mr Prost.

Yeah, I loved that one, they had one of the worst chassis in F1 at the
time I think, Prost told them so in no uncertain terms and was sacked
!!!

LOL, not only was Prost one of the best drivers ever in F1, but is
regarded by many as possibly *the* best development driver in F1 ever,
and they sacked him and brought in poor Ivan Capelli to replace him, you
just knew the Ferrari would improve in huge steps from there on...

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

Barton Spencer Brow

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Barton Spencer Brow » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00


> As I mentioned at the start of my message, that was a quote from Eddie
> talking about the barge boards.


Let me quote one Mr. Edde Irvine talking specifically about the new
barge boards...

"We pretty much had the car as in the Nurburgring, I could quite
easily have put the car on pole [in the Nurburgring] if I had put a
lap together. Here [Sepang] was the first time we showed it. In
testing before Nurburgring we went backwards a little bit, but we
tested after that and understood what we had done wrong. AS YOU CAN
SEE, IT'S A BIG STEP FORWARD".

I think the misunderstanding here, John, is the lack of context. *You*
say the quote from Eddie Irvine is regarding the Ferrari barge boards,
and apparently you believe the last sentence, which you have emphasized,
is Irvine's statement that something having been done to the barge
boards is the reason for "THE BIG STEP FORWARD," but nowhere in the
Irvine quote as you have cited it is there any reference to barge boards
at all. Is there some part of the quote that you have excised -- for
brevity's sake, perhaps -- that specifically indicates Irvine was
talking about the barge boards? Where did you see the quote? I'd
certainly be interested in the full text and context of a quote made by
Irvine apparently some time before the DQ at Sepang in which he clearly
states that the barge boards in question were the reason for Ferrari's
much better showing in Malaysia than at the Luxembourg GP. Please let us
know where we can find the whole quote.

Thanks

Bart Brown

Peter Ive

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Peter Ive » Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:00:00




>> As I mentioned at the start of my message, that was a quote from Eddie
>> talking about the barge boards.


>Let me quote one Mr. Edde Irvine talking specifically about the new
>barge boards...

>"We pretty much had the car as in the Nurburgring, I could quite
>easily have put the car on pole [in the Nurburgring] if I had put a
>lap together. Here [Sepang] was the first time we showed it. In
>testing before Nurburgring we went backwards a little bit, but we
>tested after that and understood what we had done wrong. AS YOU CAN
>SEE, IT'S A BIG STEP FORWARD".

>I think the misunderstanding here, John, is the lack of context. *You*
>say the quote from Eddie Irvine is regarding the Ferrari barge boards,
>and apparently you believe the last sentence, which you have emphasized,
>is Irvine's statement that something having been done to the barge
>boards is the reason for "THE BIG STEP FORWARD," but nowhere in the
>Irvine quote as you have cited it is there any reference to barge boards
>at all. Is there some part of the quote that you have excised -- for
>brevity's sake, perhaps -- that specifically indicates Irvine was
>talking about the barge boards? Where did you see the quote? I'd
>certainly be interested in the full text and context of a quote made by
>Irvine apparently some time before the DQ at Sepang in which he clearly
>states that the barge boards in question were the reason for Ferrari's
>much better showing in Malaysia than at the Luxembourg GP. Please let us
>know where we can find the whole quote.

I don't see why it should make any difference whether Eddie Irvine was
referring to the barge boards or not.  It really should be immaterial
whether there was an advantage to be gained or not.  The fact is that
the barge boards had a specification - for whatever reason is immaterial
- that all cars should stay within.  Now if the FIA or whoever decided
that there was some reasoning behind why this should be so then all
teams should have adhered to it.  If they didn't like the specification
when it was brought about then they should have complained about its
significance then and not, once they have been caught out suddenly cry
"Yes, but there's no advantage to be gained!"
--
Peter Ives

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.