rec.autos.simulators

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

don hodgdo

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by don hodgdo » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

<snip>

From: http://www.racesimcentral.net/

19/10/99 FIA deligate admits tip off

Jo Bauer, the FIA's technical delegate who inspected the Ferraris following
the race on Sunday, said today that "hints" had been made about Ferrari's
rules violation, which ultimately led to the disqualification of both
Ferrari drivers at the Malaysian Grand Prix.

Bauer told the German newspaper Abendzeitung that he had planned to inspect
the Ferrari cars earlier, but that the team had quickly covered them up and
parked them in their garage.

This latest development from Bauer suggests that Ferrari were aware of the
illegality of their barge boards. "But other sides were giving certain
hints," Bauer confirmed.

In the interview, Bauer made reference to gossip in the paddock relating to
Ferrari's body-work: "In Formula One, everyone inspects everyone else. They
don't directly talk to one another, but when you walk through the racing
camps, you hear comments. And you pick up on them later."

When asked why the Ferrari cars were not checked at the Nurburgring race,
Bauer said, "The cars are not selected specifically, but randomly." Many
newspapers have been speculating on the source of the tip-off, in their
latest issue to be release tomorrow, Germany's auto motor und sport magazine
said, "The tip-off came from the McLaren-Mercedes camp." Although guilty of
no offence, McLaren will not want to be seen as the team who killed the 1999
season.

<snip>

I'll agree with you there. We'll have to wait until friday to hear the FIA
Council's ruling, but I'm hoping that they uphold the DQ against Ferrari and
do not allow them the Constructor's points, but allow the drivers to retain
their points towards the DC.

don

[|]-(_)-[|]

don hodgdo

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by don hodgdo » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

There is an Indy 2000 track for GP2 at: http://www.racesimcentral.net/

It seems to follow the diagrams I've seen of the track fairly well.  It's
looks to be a Micky Mouse little circuit better suited to karts or Formula
Fords.

don

[|]-(_)-[|]



>>or are they going to set red cones all over the infield like many
>tracks do for the GT cars and other Formula racers?

>Boy, that would really***off the golfers! I hope they do it for that
>reason alone! I thought I'd seen the proposed layout somewhere, but
>maybe that was just a hallucination based on a bad dream by Yogi Berra.
>IMS sure has enough real estate to cram a decent road course into the
>thing -- hope they do the right thing...

>Bart

david kar

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by david kar » Wed, 20 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Still, I would hate to see the last works team bow out.  (Yes, yes, I know:
"works" is ever a more problematical term, but still . . .)

Question for new subthread:  _Precisely when did Ferrari move from being an
Institution, to a Souless Pit of Corruption?  Seriously?

DK




> :>I disagree.
> :>Formula 1 without Ferrari would no longer be Formula 1.

> : For some - I could live without them, they're simply another team.
> : They were certainly an institution once, but that reputation has long
> : since faded. It is kept alive in the dreams of the Tifosi, but that is
> : all.

> Same for me.  Any team with a budget exceeding 200 million USD who can't
> afford to hire a few quality control personnel and use them properly is
> strictly amateur.  If you get a carbon fibre panel wrong by 10mm in the
> aerospace industry, you throw it in the bin.  With all the design work
> done on computers now, there is no way a proposed part should slip past a
> "virtual" template at the design stage, nor past a quality check after
> production.

> Stephen

Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Richard....please read what I wrote, would you?

I said when cheating became more freqent....NOT when it started.




> : Richard, pushing the rules to the nth. degree has always existed but
> : "cheating" really only became more frequent after the commercialisation
of
> : the sport, I'm afraid.  As the commercial interests became greater, so
the
> : elevl of good sportsmanship dropped.

>   Do you have _any_ evidence for this whatsoever?

> : So from around the beginning of the 1970s onwards F1 began to decompose
in
> : that respect.

>   The most blatant examples of cheating I can think of were from the 70s
> when the sport was much less commercial.  I suspect you're suffering
> a chronic case of "golden age syndrome" - the tendancy to say "Oh it
> was much better in the past" without actually remembering much of what
> went on in the past in detail.

> --
> Richard G. Clegg       Only the mind is waving
>     Networks and Non-Linear Dynamics Group
>       Dept. of Mathematics, Uni. of York
>     www:  http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

G'day Matthew.
There you go then.....you've got your "best time".
But it's not as good as the 1960s :o)
BK




> > HAHAHA!
> > Let's see what _YOU_ romanticise about in another 20 - 30 years, Mr.
Meiji!!
> > "The best years of F1 were the [insert decade at the beginning of which
you
> > were really grabbed by F1].........."

> > We all do it because it is invariably directly associated with our
mid-***s
> > through late twenties, early thirties....certainly before permanent
> > partnerships/families are formed.  They are always the times where our
> > recollections are always "good".

> > Every generation has done it and will do it and yours, my smug friend,
will
> > be _EXACTLY_ the same!

> > And you know what is the best thing about this?  Knowing that I'm 110%
> > right!!!  LOL! :o)

> Make that 109% Bruce :-)
> I think it was far better in the early 70s, and I was kinda small  those
days being
> born in '73...
> However, I did attend a number of GPs in 74,75 and 76 :-)

> Matt

> --
> ----------------------
> The GPL Preservation Society
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> **GPLEA Member**

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.racesimcentral.net/       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Joao Sil

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Joao Sil » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00



>Utter pants. Ferrari is a souless corporate. F1 without ferrari would be F1
>without Marlboro. Sure, they've been around a bit and they've got history, but
>all ferrari is in f1 is souless, pointless marketing.

>Z.

>Please remove my_pants when replying.

And what professional sport team nowadays isn't? Welcome to the disenchanted
souless corporate world of Blade Runner <G>

Call me simple if you will, but I still get e***d when I see the red
lights ready to go out on the grid, or when Michael Schumacher puts in a
qualifying lap like he did Saturday at Sepang or seeing Ralf Schumacher
wrestle his car in the rain at Nurburgring or many other great moments in
"modern" F1.

While I admit F1 is much more soul-less than it was a in the "good ole days",
I still quite enjoy it apart from screw-ups like what happened this weekend.

I think even if you had this discussion in the 70's or even 60's there probably
would have been some people at that time who would have said "those" days
compared sadly to the great days of F1 in the 50's <G>.

Of course here in the States I'm just glad to be able to *see* F1 coverage
these days, I spent a good few years while in college unable to afford cable
TV and so my only F1 coverage came from USENET rec.autos.sports and FIDONET F1
discussion group. This probably makes me more happy with what we have today
than most.

And yes I do also wish Lotus was part of F1, soul-less corporate organization
or not.

Seeyas on the track.

--John (Joao) Silva

GPL Ferrari driver.
Powerslide Racing Team  - GMSS  League F1 division.
Rossi Razzi Racing Team - IGPLC League F2 division.

Steve Ferguso

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Steve Ferguso » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

: Do not, I repeat, do NOT believe info provided by RTL television. ;)

Just once... once... I wish they would pull someone out of the audience
who knew how to drive F1RS.  It's painful to watch some moron in a Dekra
baseball cap sawing away at the wheel.  Last night's audience offering was
some myopic accountant who drove the first half of Suzuka in first gear,
then spun off into the gravel when the commentators suggested that the car
had 6 forward gears.  For those who don't know, RTL (German network) has a
show called Warm-Up where they get some experts (cough cough) together to
discuss the upcoming or preceding race, and one thing they do is show a
virtual lap of the race using a HyperSimulator and F1RS (or maybe MGPRS).
Marc Surer at least has managed to get the hang of sim racing enough to
come within 10 seconds of a good lap.

Speaking of Surer, I am reminded of a conversation I had with a German
poster on rasf1 when we were discussing alternatives to RTL, and I
suggested the Swiss network SF2 if he could get around the Swiss German.
His comment was that he had no problems understanding Marc Surer.  When I
finally tuned in RTL I had to laugh.  It may not seem like it, but Surer
is speaking high German on RTL.  If one tunes in the Swiss motor shows and
sees Surer, the difference is remarkable.  Sorry, waaaaaay off topic, but
maybe good for a smile from a select few on RAS.

Stephen

Steve Ferguso

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Steve Ferguso » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00



:> Well, obviously, it was that 10mm of board that allowed him to be so
: fast.
:>

: If you'd bother to read more about it, every team in F1 on record about
: the issue states it's NO ADVANTAGE.

: Are you ignorant?  Or just uninformed?

Or (c) possesses a better command of sarcasm than you do... :)

Stephen

Steve Ferguso

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Steve Ferguso » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

That's partly why I was sympathetic to Simtek.  I liked the gangly
engineer who headed it.  what was his name now... Wirth?  I forget.
Anyway, he seemed like a good "idea" man without the cash to do the things
he really wanted to do.

Stephen

:>Lotus & Ferrari are nothing but souless corporates both
:>
:>without Mr C & mr E.

: I was a big Lotus fan, but remember how quickly they went down hill with out
: Colin?  He was the "idea" man, the rest of the engineers just implemented
: his concepts.  His personality (and Enzo's) defined those teams.  Today, I
: agree, it's all corporate.  The technology is better, but the personality is
: gone.

mark jeangerar

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by mark jeangerar » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

I also liked:

Formula One.......a time when the pursuit of speed was all that mattered. A
time when the technology ignited the spirit of only the bravest and most
skilled pilots. A time when the daring of one man/machine combination fueled
his rivals to "one up" the performance - on a weekly basis. A time when the
whole sport spiraled upwards into the ultimate road racing series, even
beyond what we imagined it could be. A time when NASA hung around for
"tips".

Formula One.......a time when it was about speed in the purest sense of the
word.

--
Mark Jeangerard
www.soundchaserweb.com
New Mexico USA


mark jeangerar

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by mark jeangerar » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Just my way of agreeing with you. The Shoe was brilliant beyond words.

Unless that barge board was what did it. Yep, talked myself out of agreeing
with you... that board was responsible for every bit of technique that we
saw ooze from the Shoe's car. He was just a passenger.

:-)

--
Mark Jeangerard
www.soundchaserweb.com
New Mexico USA


Meij

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Meij » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

I don't romaticise about anything thus far in my life. All looking back
does is make me feel older than I feel normally and I'm reasonable enough
to remember the bad parts of the past as well as the good parts.

That members of a generation do this isn't under dispute, whether or not
I will is a different matter. My father is very much realist about the
past and I don't see me changing so much that I become different to the
way I am now.

So to summarise Mr Kennewell (I'm trying to be as patronising as you
here, does it work?): Just because you're incapable of looking back with
any kind of realism don't assume the rest of us are the same.

Regards

M



mark jeangerar

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by mark jeangerar » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Just my way of agreeing with you. The Shoe was brilliant beyond words.

Unless that barge board was what did it. Yep, talked myself out of agreeing
with you... that board was responsible for every bit of technique that we
saw ooze from the Shoe's car. He was just a passenger.

:-)

--
Mark Jeangerard
www.soundchaserweb.com
New Mexico USA




> > Well, obviously, it was that 10mm of board that allowed him to be so
> fast.

> > --

> > Mark Jeangerard

> If you'd bother to read more about it, every team in F1 on record about
> the issue states it's NO ADVANTAGE.

> Are you ignorant?  Or just uninformed?

> Hammer2k

> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

A statistic (of limited interest, I would imagine):

Of the (what is it....eleven? Twelve?) teams running in Grands Prix in 1999,
only one of them was entering events when Formula One commenced....over 40
years ago.



> > Utter pants. Ferrari is a souless corporate. F1 without ferrari would be
F1
> > without Marlboro. Sure, they've been around a bit and they've got
history, but
> > all ferrari is in f1 is souless, pointless marketing.

> F1 without Ferrari would be like F1 without Lotus...........

> --

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/
> "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

OT: Ferrari Disqualified!

by Bruce Kennewel » Thu, 21 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Now let's be fair and honest, Mr. Z.
ALL.....repeat, ALL the teams that are entered in F1 today are either
soulless corporations in their own right or are backed by same.

BK


  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.