For the ump***th time, there have been four driver deaths in NASCAR in the
past nine months. No driver deaths in F1 since 1994. It's a badly run sport
because these deaths could have been prevented ( the HANS device certainly
would helped).
How can you discount the past nine months? F1 evolved after the death of
Senna (no deaths since), if it hadn't and drivers continued to die due to
poor management, then I'd criticize it the same way I've criticized NASCAR.
NASCAR does not evolve. It just continues to deny that anything can be done
to make it safer. The past nine months prove that. It's a badly run sport if
for no other reason then their continued failure to make a device such as
the HANS mandatory.
I used to race a motocross bike. 100mph on unfamiliar terrain, with trees 10
feet to either side of me. No rollcage. I guess my skin was my rollcage.
Launched myself high in the air, etc. People used to tell me how brave I was
to do that. I told them there was no bravery involved at all. I was simply
having foolish fun. Bravery is forcing yourself to do something for the
greater good, even when you're afraid to do so. I wanted to ride the cycle.
Race car drivers want to race. They aren't forced to. I realized what I was
doing was foolish because IMO, all a person is doing when they die while
"playing" is avoiding a lifetime of responsibilities, and giving up the
opportunity to counter all the bad there is in this world with their own
good.
<snip long list>
The point is, there have been none since 1994. F1 changed. NASCAR hasn't and
won't. More drivers will die soon. Bet on it. Could a F1 driver die soon
too? Absolutely. I doubt though that four will die in the space of nine
months, and still no significant changes will be made.
That's funny. A NASCAR fan is on Jeopardy right now, and the comment she
made was, "We don't all go to see the crashes." That she even felt compelled
to say that.......
So I'm wrong for saying NASCAR is poorly run motor sport for not making
changes in the past, but then you say it needs to get it's act together and
make changes now?
I have news for you Don, most sensible people outside of the NASCAR fans
feel the same way I do. Every person I've spoken to thinks NASCAR is a joke
right now. I live in the fourth largest market in the U.S. One of the most
listened to sports talk radio stations in the country is here (never
discusses NASCAR though, wonder why?). Since Earnhardt's death, I've been
listening to NASCAR fans call in and desperately trying to convince the
hosts and the public that their sport isn't badly run and basically the WWF
on wheels. They failed miserably. I am in the vast majority with my opinions
on this subject. Maybe not on a newsgroup with NASCAR sim fans, but
definitely within the general public. Others in this thread agree with me as
well. The last thing I'll do is apologize for criticizing a sport which has
had four deaths in nine months.
David G Fisher
> > I find it really ridiculous that people are acting as if the death of a
> > NASCAR driver is a tragedy.
> > You knew it was going to happen, and so did I. It happens almost every
> year.
> > Three times last year alone. When you support an activity that you know
> will
> > result in the death of someone, then it's not a tragedy. It's simply
> > disgusting.
> > I keep hearing the phrase, "Death is a part of auto racing, and these
> > drivers understand that but want to do it anyway." Bullshit. It isn't a
> part
> > of all types of auto racing. Just NASCAR. Formula 1 hasn't had a driver
> die
> > since 1994. Before that it was 1982. NASCAR is about beer and crashes.
> > Safety is a science in F1, and their record proves it. They have the top
> > experts in the world in charge of the safety of it's drivers. NASCAR is
a
> > joke and the modern equivalent of the galdiator races.
> > If you support NASCAR, then you support the INEVITABLE death of it's
> > drivers. How the hell are you then sad when one dies? Turns my stomach
> when
> > I read or see the melodramatic tributes to a fan favorite. I LOVE F1,
but
> if
> > the drivers were dying I'd say close it down right now. I have said on
> this
> > newsgroup before that I didn't think the F1 drivers of the '60's as
> modeled
> > in GPL were brave, heroic or "real" drivers because they raced knowing
> death
> > was a real possibility. I think they were simply foolish people who
didn't
> > value their lives very much.
> > There is NO reason why drivers have to die in NASCAR. It's simply a
POORLY
> > run, bush league type of auto racing with fans that apparently don't
TRULY
> > care about the safety of it's drivers. It's an embarrassment. Drivers
> still
> > have the choice of wearing open-faced helmets? Drivers have the choice
to
> > wear a neck brace that obviously could have saved the lives of previous
> dead
> > drivers?
> > If F1 can have such a tremendous safety record, then there is NO excuse
> for
> > NASCAR's terrible one. It's THAT simple.
> > Shut it down or just count the races until the next dead driver is
pulled
> > from his car. Then the people who are in charge of NASCAR, and it's fans
> can
> > once again pay tribute to them.
> > Pathetic.
> > David G Fisher