Even if we didnt do that(we did though), they still had a devasted Hiroshima
to look at to know how serious we were. And we did that to the Japanese for
killing "only" 2100 of our people. Imagine what we'll do to someone that
took out more than 10,000? Could get interesting.
Skye
> I am almost positive I remember that we detonated a much smaller device on
> some island and somehow tried to tell the Japanese that we would do this.
I
> will have to read up on that....
> > > Ah, no. I think we cheered when they surrendered. And also, the
> bombing
> > of
> > > Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved a ton of lives on both sides if we had to
> > > invade Japan. Don't forget, the US showed Japan on a remote island
the
> > Nuke
> > > before this happened, and they would not surrender.
> > That's news to me. As far as I know, we only detonated a test bomb in
New
> > Mexico. I was unaware that the Japanese ever had any kind of first hand
> > demonstration, before Hiroshima. Of course after Hiroshima they didn't
> > surrender. After Nagasaki, there was an attempted palace coup by those
> who
> > did not want to surrender. So I don't agree with your details, but it's
> > clear the Japanese didn't want to surrender.
> > > This is a whole different thing, apples and oranges.
> > It's about as unprovoked an attack as you're going to get when a
> superpower
> > regularly interferes in the affairs of other nations. In world affairs
we
> > don't sit around peacefully harvesting flowers, but we also don't
inflict
> > (likely) 10,000 civilian deaths in an urban center. I don't remember
even
> > the Kosovo bombings, which I was opposed to, having anywhere near that
> kind
> > of body count.
> > --
> > Cheers, www.3DProgrammer.com
> > Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
> > People who make personal attacks are useless.
> > I killfile them no matter who they are insulting.