rec.autos.simulators

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

Milhous

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Milhous » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:19:18

If MS didn't feel like overcharging for anything and everything they sell -
you could spend more on the software you're putting on your computer than
the computer itself with Microsoft products alone - I highly doubt piracy
would be any problem.

And I'll take my friends over some 100% anti-MS *** whining in a newsgroup
any day.

Milhouse




> > Matter of fact, it's people like that, that is the reason for this type
of
> > nonsense to begin with.

> > Don Burnette

> Yea, thx to *your* buddies Millhouse we have to put up with this crap.
Some
> nice friends you have there.

Mitch Alatorr

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Mitch Alatorr » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:35:40

Uhhhh Larry wake up man.  I didn't call you a spammer I simply quoted from
the previous post in which the post-er did actually call Chris a spammer
(yeah incorrect but not my point).  I have no problems whatsoever in off
topic threads when OT is used in the subject line.  I do have fire shootin
outta my fingers right now but I'll refrain from flamin ya cause I believe
it's simply a reading comprehension issue <G>.  Follow a little closer next
time k.  Oh yeah, unfortunately I do know what the SPAM is.  *** tastin
stuff eh?

Mitch


line losing the Super

> Mitch,

> So I am a 'Spammer', because I posted an OT that someone else might find
> useful?

> You have NO idea what the term SPAM means, that's obvious.

> -Larry



> > Ed,

> > If you read the entire thread you will see that Chris is not the spammer
> > here.  The other larry began the thread as an OT and Chris did nothing
> more
> > than reply to the question and all of the replies.  Just because he is
> > standing up to the anti-MS crowd you decide he is the spammer and you
> reply
> > to him in a faux-polite tone asking him to leave.  Perhaps you should
> > re-read the thread and ask the *spammer* to leave instead of the person
> who
> > replies to the original post.  Just an observation not a war :)

> > Mitch



> > > Chris,

> > > Please be nice and take your spam elsewhere... this is a auto
simulation
> > > group.
> > > Thanks!



> > > > Jan is my Wife's name.  8-)
> > > > --
> > > > Chris H.
> > > > Microsoft MVP - Windows XP
> > > > Associate Expert
> > > > Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone

Milhous

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Milhous » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:03:59


*snicker* That reminds me of a kid in the same honors physics class I'm
taking, but earlier in the day...they paid him a few bucks in class to eat a
whole raw can of Lite Spam.

Being a slightly developmentally challenged football player, he did it, of
course.  Hehe.

I wonder if they set up the schedule so there's at least one football player
in each of his classes...the one in mine has this thing for hitting himself
in the face with whatever we're using - projectile launchers, rockets,
bicycle pumps, rulers, those planes that fly around on string - with the
prop at full speed, of course...idiotic, yet funny. ;)

Milhouse


> line losing the Super

> > Mitch,

> > So I am a 'Spammer', because I posted an OT that someone else might find
> > useful?

> > You have NO idea what the term SPAM means, that's obvious.

> > -Larry



> > > Ed,

> > > If you read the entire thread you will see that Chris is not the
spammer
> > > here.  The other larry began the thread as an OT and Chris did nothing
> > more
> > > than reply to the question and all of the replies.  Just because he is
> > > standing up to the anti-MS crowd you decide he is the spammer and you
> > reply
> > > to him in a faux-polite tone asking him to leave.  Perhaps you should
> > > re-read the thread and ask the *spammer* to leave instead of the
person
> > who
> > > replies to the original post.  Just an observation not a war :)

> > > Mitch



> > > > Chris,

> > > > Please be nice and take your spam elsewhere... this is a auto
> simulation
> > > > group.
> > > > Thanks!



> > > > > Jan is my Wife's name.  8-)
> > > > > --
> > > > > Chris H.
> > > > > Microsoft MVP - Windows XP
> > > > > Associate Expert
> > > > > Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone

Tim Wheatle

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Tim Wheatle » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:31:15

I'm not sure, infact, I've been feeling ill recently.. so I couldn't er...
read... I had my eyes closed... it was foggy, Look officer, I was on
holiday, it couldn't have been me.

Tim



> Tim,

> What are you talking about?

> -Larry



> > Well... why do you believe you needed to reinstall something which was
> > working?

> > Tim



> > > Well, it was bound to happen.  Windows XP's stupid product activation
> was
> > > _bound_ to***up eventually.

> > > Well, it did.

> > > This evening, I was troubleshooting network connectivity problems on
my
> XP
> > > Client Machine.  One of the steps I took was the time-honored
tradition
> of
> > > removing the Ethernet Card entry in the Device Manager, and letting
> > Windows
> > > re-detect it and reinstall the drivers during restart.

> > > Well, instead of Windows XP booting up and redetecting the NIC card
and
> > > reinstalling the drivers, I got the dreaded Windows XP Activation
> notice!

> > > It said something about not being able to validate my Hardware
> > > Configuration, and asked me if I wanted to re-activate.

> > > Sure, why not.

> > > However, because this stupid Product Activation would not let the
system
> > > boot up into Windows, the damned NIC card drivers were not allowed to
> > > reinstall and.  This means, of course, that product activation could
not
> > do
> > > it's thing over the Internet.

> > > Ok, fine.  I've got 10 minutes to waste (like I really had a choice).

> > > I called the toll-free number.

> > > Now, I went through the drawn-out automated re-activation process,
where
> > you
> > > punch in this ridiculously long number, and wait for it to read back
> your
> > > activation key.

> > > Except, it said it could not validate my hardware configuration.

> > > Now, I had to get passed to a 'human' to get it done.

> > > Ok, so now I get to plead my case for the continuing privilage of
using
> an
> > > operating system that I paid good money for to someone on the
telephone.
> > I
> > > didn't get the impression that this person really understood the
> technical
> > > issue behind this (which I consider a bug in activation), but I did
get
> > > re-activated.

> > > Windows finally booted, installed my NIC card drivers, and I was back
on
> > the
> > > Internet.

> > > So, my solution fixed my Network problem, but it was like travelling
> from
> > > ***ia to Maryland, by way of San Diego.

> > > Keep in mind that during this whole process MICROSOFT had all of my
data
> > > locked up and held hostage by this stupid activation system.

> > > If it weren't for the fact that I'd have to go back to Dual-Boot 98/2K
> (2K
> > > won't run all of my software), I would throw this XP disk in the
damned
> > > trash can.

> > > We don't need this crap.

> > > Larry

Aguirr

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Aguirr » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:25:14


Yes, but it won't remain that way for too much longer.

Yes, I've already done that and deleted MSN at the same time. But the files
for Messenger are still on my system even though it did stop it from loading
automatically. But, my point is that I shouldn't have to jump through hoops
to make XP behave as I want it to and MS shouldn't be hiding uninstall
features of programs like Messenger, a program I consider a security risk.
Remember how in Win98 you had the option to remove the online provider stuff
in the add/remove program? Well, it never did remove anything. When
installing Win98 you had the option to install this ***or not, if you
chose no it installed it anyway. Now what is up with that?

OK, thx.

Aguirr

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Aguirr » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:31:11


Chris said to me in another post that if this comes to be then they will
offer a download that will disable the activation process. He also said he
has heard rumours that MS plan to make their OS rentware but isnt' privvy to
that info himself, and so have I. Bye-bye Microsoft.

Aguirr

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Aguirr » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:36:51


I did send MS a comment that I think it sucks. :-)
Look at he bottom of this page. You too can send MS a comment on what you
think of WPA.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q305356&VOTE=1

Yes, I've already looked into it and do have the files to do it. But there
is more than one method around and some people seem to think  they can cause
problems in XP so I don't want to use it unless I really have to. I've
changed harware a number of times now and have not had a problem with
activation yet. Fingers crossed.

Aguirr

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Aguirr » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:40:50


I don't consider MS pricing overpriced at all. Considering that Norton Ghost
2002 costs $119.00 CAD and XP Home cost me $139.00 CAD I would say that XP
gives far more bng for the buck.

At least I don't steal from Microsoft! You think your friends are some
modern day Robin Hood's or what?

Richard Walke

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Richard Walke » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:41:34





> > If you don't like it, then don't run the software.  It's perfectly
> > simple.

> What, people aren't allowed to voice their opinion's about bad technology
> any more, Richard?

Of course they are, but it is silly to moan about Microsoft's products but
keep buying them!!!

That's almost as daft as people who complain about EA, then buy all their F1
titles... ;-)

--
Richard.

"It's been a hard day's night, and I been working like a dog."

:: Blank :

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by :: Blank : » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:56:32

Do you really think we can make or break MS...too late I think. I'd like to
hear your plan however :)




> > As I said, no one forces anyone to purchase and install Windows XP.
> That's
> > a user choice, and by doing homework first like checking the hardware
> > compatibility list (http://www.microsoft.com/hcl/) and doing things like
> > reading this newsgroup, the install is fine.

> Yes, but if one buys new hardware after they have XP up and running nicely
> and this new hardware causes a problem with some other device then they
may
> be required to pull out old hardware and try other hardware until they
track
> the problem down. The activation scheme can cause a big pain in the arse
> because of this. People have already reported that they have been getting
> the heavy hand from MS when they have needed to reactivate over the phone
> because they couldn't online. This is bullshit Chris, most computer users
> here are power users and are continually upgrading hardware.

> Just answer me this one question though, does MS have plans to make their
OS
> rentware in the near future? If yes, then I can stop worrying about all
this
> and vow never to buy another piece of MS software again. Maybe I'll even
buy
> a Mac one of these days. Me, and  millions of others that think like I do
> can make or break MS, tell your buddy Bill that too.

Aguirr

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Aguirr » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:47:25


P.S. How can I possibly be 100% anti-MS when I actually paid MS for using
WinXP?
You need a core logic upgrade dude.

Aguirr

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Aguirr » Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:59:35



Sure, just stop buying their products, make a noise about your opinion of
WPA etc. Maybe we can't break them but we can certainly make them think
twice about their policies. Just look at  Intel as an example of a company
who has been humbled in the last year throught the *** of AMD and many
consumers choice of cpu. Now they are making DDR mb's availalbe and RDRAM is
just about as cheap as DDR. At one time they were trying to railroad us into
expensive RDRAM. Any company can be king one day and a pauper the next if
they***off the consumer enough.

Steve Levet

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Steve Levet » Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:07:54

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,18423,00.html Is this the real
reason MS want all our info. I'm think it is and the passport system just
proves it to me. Maybe they are collecting info for a rent system in the
future.

--

Steve Levett



> Chris,

> I'm afraid that doesn't jive with what happened to me.

> I didn't even remove the card.  I didn't evem MOVE the card.  I simply
> removed it's entry from the device manager so that Windows would reinstall
> the driver at the next restart.

> That suggests that alterations in SOFTWARE can also trigger WPA, and that
> sucks.

> Though I appreciate your input, there is NO excuse for Microsoft's digital
> leash known as WPA.

> What if I had been working on a time-sensitive deliverable?  Would
Microsoft
> have refunded me the money lost due to this defect in their product?  Of
> course, the answer is no...

> -Larry



> > Eldred:  As long as you're shifting the same items around, you really
> should
> > have no problem.  Adding new things, perceived by Windows XP as
"changes,"
> > to the mix results in a different "hash" being created.  Once the
> threshold
> > as described at http://www.aumha.org/a/wpa.htm is exceeded, this would
> force
> > a free telephone call.

> > There's a pretty good 10-item list on that site which describes what is
> > tracked and the method used.  There are also a few suggestions for those
> who
> > do change hardware quite often.  People have even changed out the
> > motherboard, for instance, without triggering a new activation.

> > Jens:  I do care, otherwise I wouldn't be putting up with stuff you're
> > stating.  I haven't seen you jump in here with helpful suggestions, yet
I
> > voluntarily try to assist people and all that is coming from you is an
> > unwarranted attack.

> > Since you don't know me, your accusations and telling the world what
> version
> > I own or anything else about what I think or do is not only inaccurate,
> but
> > untruthful.  I own Windows XP Pro, retail final version, available off
the
> > shelf at your local computer store.  I also have a copy which I received
> for
> > beta testing the product for nearly a year.  I installed clean on this
> > desktop using XP to format to NTFS, and added my normal programs
> afterward.
> > --
> > Chris H.
> > Microsoft MVP - Windows XP
> > Associate Expert
> > Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone

Ed Solhei

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Ed Solhei » Wed, 30 Jan 2002 01:13:52

Touch!  :-)

--
ed_


> GPL, then F1 Championship Season 2000 (not really what I'd call a sim,
> though).  I really, really prefer GPL.  And the only Microsoft game I have
> on my system is a role playing game I'm beta testing.

> - Chris H.

Aguirr

OT - My first problem with Windows XP Product Activation

by Aguirr » Wed, 30 Jan 2002 01:35:20



Well, after reading this article below I have made up my mind. I'm going
back to Win98, I'm going to install Win98Lite by Shane Brooks to gut out IE,
I'm going to use Opera as my web browser and I'm going to use Agent for news
and email. This is as far as I'm ever going with Microsft softare for the
forseeable future.

http://www.racesimcentral.net/#demandslist

"Second, we do not recommend consumers use any Microsoft products, for a
variety of reasons including its history on privacy and security. Creating
something called an "import privacy rule" for IE6 constitutes an implied
endor***t very remote from our estimation of the company and its products.
Regrettably, the products we recommend for people to protect their privacy
online are not made by Microsoft. Other web browsers have consistently
provided better cookie management features and less privacy-invasive
defaults. It is very sad that the largest software manufacturer has done so
little for privacy, and is willfully continuing that trailership position."


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.