Sam Altersitz wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:55:10 -0700, Charles Doane
> <gdo...@mindspring.com> attempted to sound witty, but instead came out
> sounding like this... :
>
>
>>You have to consider this...
>>Does anybody do that at home?
> Yes, many people do do all these things at home.
I seriously doubt that. Nobody is buying $300 video cards for word
processing and spread sheets.
>>>Does your console run Office programs?
>>
>>Silly me, I run those at the office. That's why they're Office programs.
>
>
> Silly me, I suppose that's why millions of people also use them at
> home for things like finishing up work (my mother makes spreadsheets
> for scheduling shifts at her job on her PC, for example), or even
> *gasp* just to write stuff for fun!
Most people actually finish up work AT work. That's what the place is
for. I'm sure employers just LOVE having employees finish up the job
off the clock using their own resources, but it's a very bad idea and
it opens a window of potential liability. For example, if the employer
*did* pay her for her time making those spreadsheets, then those belong
to the employer, and they're on HER computer. What happens if they
part ways (she quits, gets fired, laid off, etc.) and the employer
wants his property back (or destroyed)? Think that could get ugly?
There's an old saying about mixing business and pleasure. I don't.
> While most Office programs don't have a real need at the normal home,
> Word or another word processor is something that every computer should
> have. Hell, half the kids in college couldn't survive without a word
> processing application on their PCs/laptops. I truly doubt the
> libraries would let them stay in them all night to write term papers
> and such, especially with thousands of other students waiting to use
> those same PCs..
>
> And yes, simple word processing programs are part of office suites.
If the kids couldn't survive in college without a word processor then
they shouldn't BE in college until they can. That's the reason there
are so many nearly illiterate people coming out of colleges with a
diploma that should rightfully be awarded to their laptop PC.
It's like handing a calculator to a kid before they learn to do math
on paper or in their head. It turns them into useless slugs unless
a machine is around to help them.
>>>Does your console run drawing programs?
>>
>>If it weren't for taking screenshots of error messages at work, I could
>>honestly say that I've never run Paint in the last five years.
> Consoles have had their drawing programs as well. Mario Paint is an
> example of one. It's older, but it was on the SNES and used *gasp* a
> mouse!
Yeah, I remember that one. It was the Nintendo Bargain Bin speed king
until Hey You Pikachu dethroned it for the title of quickest clearance
Nintendo title ever made. Nobody liked it.
>>>Does your console run music programs?
>>
>>Silly me, I have a stereo system to play music the old-fashioned way.
>>I even play 8-tracks on it. Music programs can't do that.
>
>
> But music programs can make lives easier. Setting up personalized
> playlists without the hassle of having to remove and insert the data
> medium the music is stored on is something I use extensively while I
> am on my PC.
Oh. My. GAWD.
You would probably just fall over dead if you were actually faced with
a record player then. How lazy can you be? And wasn't it you just
one post ago saying that you wanted to run Linux because opening a
bunch of apps bogs down the machine?
I never set up personalized playlists. I like music arranged by
people who know what they're doing. I'm not a music arranger.
A CD is not so much work that it's going to break my arm changing one
every 40 minutes or so. I don't even need to do that. I've got a
6-CD cartridge changer, so that's good for 4 hours and then I just
plug in another cartridge for another 4 hours. I've got three of
them so I could run 12 solid hours of music changing cartridges a
total of twice. And that's without bogging down any PC.
> Add in the editing programs you can get, and practically anyone can
> start mixing their own music. And for a hell of a lot less than going
> and buying DAT players, tapes, and mixing boards and such.
>
>
>>>Does your console run wordprocessers?
>>
>>I see that your spell check is running fabulously. I don't WANT a
>>word processor for a toy.
>
>
> Didn't the Saturn have a word processing program for it? I know you
> could also set up the DC to run Word as well. And both consoles had
> keyboard peripherals, as well as mice.
That does nothing to change the fact that I don't want a word
processor as a toy. If the Saturn DID have a word processor, I sure
wouldn't buy it, and as for the DC, running Word on a box that has
no printer port is pretty much an exercise in futility.
>>>Does your console run database programs?
>>
>>Actually, yeah, they do. That's how they manage game saves.
>
>
> No, that's not how they manage game saves. They use flash RAM (for
> memory cards) or a hard drive (in the Xbox's case). Database programs
> are what you use when you are setting up servers, and they are what
> you access each time you go to a web page. Programs like SQL, ISS,
> etc. Moron.
Dummy, the flash RAM does NOTHING to manage itself and neither does a
hard drive. They use FILE ALLOCATION TABLES. Read the word TABLES
again. TABLES TABLES TABLES. Get it? Got it? Now WHAT ELSE uses
tables? HELLO DATABASE PROGRAM!!!
Before you go calling someone else a moron, you'd best have your ducks
in a row or you're gonna look the part of the fool yourself.
>>>Does your console run mail programs?
>>
>>No, there's a mailbox on my porch which handles my mail needs.
>>There's a whole bunch of nice people in the Post Office to do
>>that. The PC is just a source of spam.
>
>
> Both the Sega Saturn and the Sega Dreamcast could and did run email
> programs, as well as web applications. Try not to let it destroy you
> that consoles are able to handle these simple things as well, Eugene.
So what? Do you realize that the two consoles you named CRASHED AND
BURNED? Both of them died early deaths. Looks like their 'net ability
did about jack-point-squat to help their sales. Nobody WANTS a console
to do those things. The Xbox won't. It's going closed network, so you
can forget E-mail on that. The GC probably won't get any browser or
e-mail app ever. The only one left is PS2, and that thing doesn't have
any HDD yet to even be remotely useful for that. Besides, a PS2 ($199)
plus the HDD ($130) and the Network adapter ($40) brings you up to a
total of $369. You could buy a PC that would kick it's butt for doing
e-mail and web for about that much.
>>>Does your console run video editing programs?
>>
>>Oh, there's something I do every day <sarcasm>. Who in the
>>heck runs video editing programs for home use? Other than
>>kiddie porn there's no real purpose for it.
>
>
> Maybe for making home movies to send to grandma and grampa? Perhaps
> for just fun? There's loads of cheap editing tools out there. Next
> you'll say that home video cameras are also something that no one
> uses.
Yeah, like there are a whole lot of old geezers with PC's capable of
watching home movies on. That's why home video cameras tend to use
videotape. Gramps might actually HAVE a VCR. Maybe.
Besides, home movies aren't supposed to look like Spielberg made it.
>>>Nope, it doesn't, that's why it's a console.
>>
>>Which is exactly what I want. The RIGHT tool for the RIGHT
>>job. That's what consoles are.
>
>
> They're the right tools for their specific purposes. You can't have
> an Xbox, however, and expect to run PS2 or GC software on it. As
> closed source as Windows may be, consoles are even more closed source.
That's one of the best things about consoles. With them being so
closed, the software is made by invitation only. That's why there's
such a better signal to noise ratio on console games as opposed to
PC ones.
> At least on the PC they can make the same game run no matter what sort
> of hardware you have under the hood, and in many cases now the OS is
> mattering less and less as well.
No, on the PC *you* can make the same game run. They expect the end
user to do a lot of work. Tons of work tracking down patches, doing
the installation, answering configuration questions and making sure
that the drivers are all up to date.
>>If it was just hooking them up, I wouldn't be bothered. It's the
>>seemingly endless patches, registrations, and configurations that
>>rip the fun right out of anything associated with a PC.
>
>
> No one said PCs always had to be fun, Eugene.
Way to miss the point. PC's are NEVER fun. They're frustration
personified, they drive users into mad rages, they cause mental
anguish and distress, and they're the reason that IT professionals
have the most illegal drug abuse of any profession.
> Gaming PCs should be fun.
No, they should be shot.
> Dedicated servers shouldn't be fun, they should be reliable and
> able to run mission critical applications at all times. Hardly any
> fun involved in running mission critical applications, however.
>
>
>>I don't deny that this is a PC. I'm about to shoot the damned thing
>>with my classic 1962 J.C. Higgins Model 20 12-Gauge shotgun if it comes
>>up with one more error message or another stupid question trying to PISS
>>ME OFF. This is NOT a "little effort". I had my Xbox playing games
>>inside of 10 minutes of opening the console's package. You can't get a
>>PC to do that on a bet to save your life.
>
>
> I can get games up and running on my PC in under 5 minutes of opening
> the game's CD. Maybe if you got some better hardware, or maybe a
> little actual knowledge of how you should install things, you wouldn't
> have these problems.
5
...
read more »