>And vice versa. Most leagues run their own forums for a reason, to keep it
>in the league not public. It would be nice if RASCAR could do the same.
Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
LOL, Sorry. I was really not trying to be a smartass, nor start a new line
of posts against you. In RASN there are many off topic posts, some of which
I join, others I ignore. I also agree that the RASCAR threads get very long
here. I have even mentioned it. There were several threads in our forum
and they were going on a good bit. Mitch posted over here and it seems the
whole conversation moved, then the regular readers joined, then it got out
of hand. Yes, I think so too. Tried to settle things a little but didn't
work, what can ya do???
I do think RASCAR belongs here though. I bought NR2K3, liked it and found I
could drive it pretty well so I subscribed to this NG, found RASCAR here
(woohoo ! ) and joined, were it not discussed on here who knows where I
would have ended up?
Why don't more guys/gals(?) post on the other threads? Maybe discussions of
hardware don't touch a nerve, perhaps discussions of particular sims just
doesn't get the *** boiling. There is definetly some personality
conflicts that keep our threads active and that is not really on the
shoulders of the group RASCAR.
Just MHO
Sean
Is this true ? What's the problem with letting 30-40(max) vote on a web
site ? A quick majority rule and no "whining" afterwards.
> Commendable, Jan. Well done.
> No doubt those who were subject to your governance were (and are) most
> grateful.
> (Why you would even mention making excuses I have no idea and what golf has
> to do with it leaves me bemused as well.)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"
http://www.theuspits.com
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--
oh forget it. I'll go back to sleep...
Steve
> >So put that on your cracker
> >and chew on it for a while.
> What the...? Redneck speak...? :-)
> Eldred
One of them might even be funny.
Marc
> > Wow, now that's representative of "all the ex-military". I served in
> > the Gulf of Tonkin on the USS Turner Joy. I was getting shot at
> > before many of you were even born. I guess your "all the ex-
> > military" assumption just got pretty much blown out of the water...
> Yeah..Ok...
> The only people shooting at you were your fellow village people.
> (damn, I wish he hadn't killfiled me..this could have been top laughs)
He's a vet, alright. A veteran bullshitter.
If I raced in RASCAR (I don't, because of various reasons including some
paint car thingy problem), I would for sure chat under caution. I don't
want to ***ing bore me to death while waiting for the next stupid wreck.
I've waiting too long in my "sim" racing career to not allow myself to chat
under caution. Screw those 1% idiots who wreck while chatting under
caution.
There's that tool, just mute the guy who chats. Papy made the tool for
that.
--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
David G Fisher
> What if someone watched a RASCAR race and then published herein their
> observations of said race in which they critiqued the performance and
> behaviour of the participants and the organisation?
> And what if the post wasn't made until, say, Tuesday?
> Is anyone going to tell me that such a post wouldn't receive a reaction
from
> those being referred to?
> Just a hypothetical, of course. :)
> Bruce
> > I sure as hell won't have one person telling
> > me that I can't talk about a race at r.a.s., with those from r.a.s.,
after
> > 9pm on the Tues. following a race. You've got to be f***ing kidding me.
> (Although I would classify cricket as a form of torture. I think that the
> Spanish Inquisition invented cricket.)
> Bruce.
>>Yep, just like football, cricket, rugby...
Gerry
>>>Well I guess Im the only one that has the balls to stand up to John (and
>>>Eldred though hes a silent partner). This is getting ridiculous.
>>Penalties
>>>for nearly anything and everything. <snip>
>>Don't you guy's have a forum/web page or something ? Just put up a vote
> for
>>any rules that you want implemented ..How hard can this be ?
> The dictator says we WILL NOT take polls!!
> >>>Well I guess Im the only one that has the balls to stand up to John (and
> >>>Eldred though hes a silent partner). This is getting ridiculous.
> >>Penalties
> >>>for nearly anything and everything. <snip>
> >>Don't you guy's have a forum/web page or something ? Just put up a vote
> > for
> >>any rules that you want implemented ..How hard can this be ?
> > The dictator says we WILL NOT take polls!!
> This a worrying. If there is no mechanism for a vote of confidence in
> the admin. then it is indeed a dictatorship.
Considering that Dave and Mitch are really the only ones really
complaining out of the 50+ members, I'd say that speaks volumes. I'm
be willing to lose two or even 20 people over rules changes than even
ONE person because of crappy racing.
In fact, more people have stated that they'd be willing to see what
happens with the penalty thing, or don't care because all they really
want to do is race. Besides that, I have already stated and RE-
stated that if it didn't work or didn't appear to be needed, that
we'd try something else.
Short of allowing everyone to come up with their own personal set of
rules that only they have to obey, I don't see how I could be more
accomodating.
