For Graphics F1RS
For realism and gameplay GP2
When they combine the two we will all be happy but until then .............
.......let the arcade players use F1RS and the sim fans use GP2
Just my thoughts
SteveG
Correct.
Bull.
This is absolute bullshit.
--
Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.
Keith.
Tech escreveu:
Thanks for your well balanced and thought provoking arguement.
Maybe you would like to give us all some clue as to why you feel like this???
SteveG
> Some other guy said:
> >>For Graphics F1RS
> >Correct.
> >>For realism and gameplay GP2
> >Bull.
> >>When they combine the two we will all be happy but until then .............
> >>.......let the arcade players use F1RS and the sim fans use GP2
> >This is absolute bullshit.
> Thanks for your well balanced and thought provoking arguement.
> Maybe you would like to give us all some clue as to why you feel like this???
l8er
ronny
--
Toys'R'Us '99: "So, would you like a hand gun with that action figure,
kiddo?"
|\ _,,,---,,_ I want to die like my Grandfather,
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ in his sleep.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Not like the people in his car,
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) screaming their heads off!
Cheers Phil
The look of the cars are better in GP2.
The pitstop is better in GP2.
The AI is better in GP2.
The mirrors are better in GP2.
The AutoLoadLastSetup is better in GP2.
The sound is better in GP2.
In Holland GP2 was in the top 10 until last December, that more than 1
year! F1RS only was 2 months in the top 10.
F1RS is a great game, no doubt about that. But there are some things
that could be improved.
Remco
> As I am probably going to get a brand new computer sometime in the near
> future that
> can flawlessly handle either, I am wondering which simulation is better.
Personally I haven't played F1RS much. I love
the sound effects in GP2, beats F1RS hands down
IMHO. You will need a mighty CPU to handle GP2
with all details on as it doesn't make use of a
3D card.
--
Andrew Fielden.
UK.
>> As I am probably going to get a brand new computer sometime in the near
>> future that
>> can flawlessly handle either, I am wondering which simulation is better.
>Great question to start a decent sim war <g>
>Personally I haven't played F1RS much. I love
>the sound effects in GP2, beats F1RS hands down
>IMHO. You will need a mighty CPU to handle GP2
>with all details on as it doesn't make use of a
>3D card.
>--
>Andrew Fielden.
>UK.
> As I am probably going to get a brand new computer sometime in the near
> future that
> can flawlessly handle either, I am wondering which simulation is better.
---
Some people like F1RS, some don't.
For me, F1RS is the first racing sim I can drive like a car.
I love that delicious feeling of*** the car on the edge
of adhesion.
I think that in GP2, the cars are either on rails, or
backward on the track. Some feel that this is the way it would
be. Drivers are quoted as saying that the transition between
traction and loss of control is very fast. GP2 models a faster
transition than F1RS, but there are many things that go into a
physics model, and I'm not sure, on balance, that GP2 has them
better than F1RS. I haven't heard Michael Schumacher post his
opinion.
So I'm enjoying F1RS, which feels VERY right, based on my
experience with sports and sporty cars I drive on roads, I
loved GP2, which is as much like my car as a Starwars Tie
Fighter. It has been retired.
---
Good luck.
Larry
> >F1RS is far superior to GP2 in every respect.
> >In fact it makes GP2 look like it was designed for the Atari.
> EVERY respect? Sorry, I disagree.
> The look of the cars are better in GP2.
Agreed
They drive perfectly, don't they?
Unrealisticly BIG?
Agreed
Equally unsatisfying
Which sim is perfect?
l8er
ronny
--
Toys'R'Us '99: "So, would you like a hand gun with that action figure,
kiddo?"
|\ _,,,---,,_ I want to die like my Grandfather,
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ in his sleep.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Not like the people in his car,
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) screaming their heads off!