>> And Ferrari were not involved in the discussion, as Williams have
>> confirmed.
> However, it HAS been reported that 9 of the 10 teams(or 10 of 11, I'm too
> rushed to look it up) had supported a chicane. Since ALL teams votes were
> needed to make the chane, the fact no chicane went up can 'partially' be
> attributed to Ferrari. Remember, they also did not want to allow Paul
> Stoddard to run his 2004 spec machinery at Australia. One could argue
> they
> are being consistant. Or one could argue they are supporting their
> sponsors. Or one could argue they are fighting for every point.
> dh
Yes well Ferrari spent 430 million dollars last year to win F1 - sounds like
they may be serious about the competition. They spent more than some
nations' GDP to win the world championship.
As for Minardi and Jordan - why they decided to boycott the race is bizarre.
They had no problems running - which makes their decision purely one of
politics. Disgusting stuff indeed.
Ferrari came to race. Ferrari raced.
Michelin and its partner teams came to sabotage the FIA. And did so. They
did it in the US because it was not in europe, basically, and as far removed
from their core fans as possible. Anyone who thinks this was not the break
away teams seizing an opportunity of sticking it to the FIA don't understand
F1 at all. Michelin teams could easily have raced - only one team had a blow
out, and only one other team reported any problems with the tyres. Slowing
down was an option, as was driving through the pits - changing the entire
configuration of the track in 20 minutes before the start of the race is a
little unrealistic. Does anyone really think changing a track in 20 minutes
is possible? And then send out 1000bhp machines onto a track that they have
never seen before? Come on - you're just playing into the Michelin teams'
hands.