Ok so he's unapologetic about the incident, which is not really
professional. He's not been in F1 long, he'll learn. However, from the quote
in David's post I read "I was not going to give away 1st position just
because it was Schumacher behind me!" into Juan's slightly broken English.
Not: "Us touching was Michael's fault."
He braked too late for the surface conditions, sure. But he didn't "keep
going" as he didn't hit the gravel at 185mph. IMO he made a credible effort
to get it stopped, but nearly lost the car and blew the corner.
I'm sure Michael didn't feel he was ahead sufficiently to squeeze the
Columbian out to the inside otherwise he would have done so.
Yes, but not slow enough to miss JPM as he lost control. Surely someone of
Schumacher's experience saw that coming a mile away. JPM is aiming to
replace Michael as the alpha male of F1, he was always going to risk going
deep on the inside in defense of that position.
True, I have no trouble with their reasoning, but I thought the way they did
it was actually illegal according to FIA rules, i.e. they should have been
more covert about it.
Yes, as Asbjorn pointed out, if Barichello had managed to push Coulthard
into a mistake, even if he was the only one to benifit from it, Coulthard
would have maximally gained 2 points. Didn't think of that.
Jan.
=---