rec.autos.simulators

A GPaL Question?

chippe

A GPaL Question?

by chippe » Tue, 18 May 1999 04:00:00

Well, with the screen shot of GPaL looking like the***pit of a 737, I see
nothing about how this is going to interface with Spyboy or VROC. I mean, I
would give up neither of these applications to run GPal. Looks to me like
you can do eveything thing you need to do now, without this. I mean, load
spyboy, chat with everyone and run a quick race or 2 like pretty quick. How
long does it take to change from F! to F3 and load your setup? 2 seconds?
The 1.1 patch will have all these GPal parameters included, and lets face
it, how often are you going to be utilizing all this? Is irc chat included ?

Is this GPal essential? VROC and Spyboy are.

Just questions...ok?

C

Michael Barlo

A GPaL Question?

by Michael Barlo » Tue, 18 May 1999 04:00:00

    I wanted to ask the same questions But didn't because of the way GPal has
been advertised.  Seems like he is giving away everything that's already in GPL
and just slapping his name on it.  He did forget some important things though..
Chat! Chat! and Chat!.

    But, then again,  If he can make this GPal work and make him look like a GOD
at the same time.. I say, go for it.


> Well, with the screen shot of GPaL looking like the***pit of a 737, I see
> nothing about how this is going to interface with Spyboy or VROC. I mean, I
> would give up neither of these applications to run GPal. Looks to me like
> you can do eveything thing you need to do now, without this. I mean, load
> spyboy, chat with everyone and run a quick race or 2 like pretty quick. How
> long does it take to change from F! to F3 and load your setup? 2 seconds?
> The 1.1 patch will have all these GPal parameters included, and lets face
> it, how often are you going to be utilizing all this? Is irc chat included ?

> Is this GPal essential? VROC and Spyboy are.

> Just questions...ok?

> C

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
=========================================
Member of R.O.R. 1999
http://www.racesimcentral.net/~marknjess/ror.html
=========================================
Racing online with the help of......

Race Communications Association
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Holodyne Engineering

Mystic Music

  mikeba.vcf
< 1K Download
Jack Ramb

A GPaL Question?

by Jack Ramb » Tue, 18 May 1999 04:00:00

Looking through a mountain of positive response, I haven't found anyone
that has a problem with having all the frequently modified GPL settings
available in a single screen.

With regard to use of VROC/Spy Boy, GPaL will certainly not prevent you from
enjoying either. In fact, if you're hosting a VROC race, GPaL will make that
process a lot easier and much more flexible.

*Many* of the options that GPaL provides will not be in the GPL 1.1
interface. Several of the great new GPL 1.1 features, in the absence of
GPaL, will be accessible only through initialization file or command line
modifications. GPaL tries to bridge the gap by providing a friendly, fast,
familiar Windows interface to all this great functionality and adds some new
twists of its own. And you've only seen the tip of the proverbial iceberg.

But, of course, everybody is certainly entitled to an opinion. Personally, I
find it a little strange that you choose to complain about a product that:
1) represents a considerable amount of work, 2) is being offered for free,
and 3) you won't be compelled to use.

In the interest of equal time for GPaL, I'll close by sharing a piece from a
very nice unsolicited e-mail that I received from Tom Pabst just today. If
you are unfamiliar with Tom, he's a two-time SCCA National Champion, former
BMW factory team driver, a SCCA competition license instructor, sim racing
instructor, sim racing league organizer, and self-confessed GPL ***.
Here's what Tom had to say...

"let me say this about GPaL.  Including all of my experience and years in
real racing....with my sim racing of the past two years....I've not
previously run into a 'racing accessory' that is as 'innovative, completely
useful and utterly needed' as your GPaL creation."

Thanks, Tom! Exceptionally kind.

Believe me, I'm uncomfortable sharing this kind of feedback, but I guess I
feel a little compelled to offset the potential damage done by a few
reckless comments made by individuals who haven't really gained a sufficient
understanding of a product but nonetheless choose to publicly lambaste it.
Makes me understand why companies like Papyrus are reluctant to talk about
product details prior to release. My goal was, and is, to make the GPL
community part of the design process.

Jack Rambo

www.RaceLive.com/GPaL

Adam

A GPaL Question?

by Adam » Tue, 18 May 1999 04:00:00

I was wondering the same thing myself.  Seems useless.


Jack Ramb

A GPaL Question?

by Jack Ramb » Tue, 18 May 1999 04:00:00

Hey, Ron.

Little curious how you're certain that "VROC 1.2 and the new SpyBoy also
have all the added features of your GPal [sic GPaL] program" since all the
features of GPaL haven't been revealed yet. To date, I've revealed the
contents of one of eight tabs in the GPaL interface. And one of those tab is
marked "TBA!"

Can you clarify?

Jack Rambo

www.RaceLive.com/GPaL

Mike Rodrigue

A GPaL Question?

by Mike Rodrigue » Tue, 18 May 1999 04:00:00

Yaaa!!

Flame! Flame!

Slam! Slam! Slam!

Yuck! Yuck!

Pooh! Pooh!

..er..

Now exactly WHAT were we talking about?

Mikey (I thought it was NRev...) the Slowpoke

|Looking through a mountain of positive response, I haven't found anyone
|that has a problem with having all the frequently modified GPL settings
|available in a single screen.
|
|With regard to use of VROC/Spy Boy, GPaL will certainly not prevent you
from
|enjoying either. In fact, if you're hosting a VROC race, GPaL will make
that
|process a lot easier and much more flexible.
|
|*Many* of the options that GPaL provides will not be in the GPL 1.1
|interface. Several of the great new GPL 1.1 features, in the absence of
|GPaL, will be accessible only through initialization file or command line
|modifications. GPaL tries to bridge the gap by providing a friendly, fast,
|familiar Windows interface to all this great functionality and adds some
new
|twists of its own. And you've only seen the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
|
|But, of course, everybody is certainly entitled to an opinion. Personally,
I
|find it a little strange that you choose to complain about a product that:
|1) represents a considerable amount of work, 2) is being offered for free,
|and 3) you won't be compelled to use.
|
|In the interest of equal time for GPaL, I'll close by sharing a piece from
a
|very nice unsolicited e-mail that I received from Tom Pabst just today. If
|you are unfamiliar with Tom, he's a two-time SCCA National Champion, former
|BMW factory team driver, a SCCA competition license instructor, sim racing
|instructor, sim racing league organizer, and self-confessed GPL ***.
|Here's what Tom had to say...
|
|"let me say this about GPaL.  Including all of my experience and years in
|real racing....with my sim racing of the past two years....I've not
|previously run into a 'racing accessory' that is as 'innovative, completely
|useful and utterly needed' as your GPaL creation."
|
|Thanks, Tom! Exceptionally kind.
|
|Believe me, I'm uncomfortable sharing this kind of feedback, but I guess I
|feel a little compelled to offset the potential damage done by a few
|reckless comments made by individuals who haven't really gained a
sufficient
|understanding of a product but nonetheless choose to publicly lambaste it.
|Makes me understand why companies like Papyrus are reluctant to talk about
|product details prior to release. My goal was, and is, to make the GPL
|community part of the design process.
|
|
|Jack Rambo

|www.RaceLive.com/GPaL
|
|
|
|

Jack Ramb

A GPaL Question?

by Jack Ramb » Tue, 18 May 1999 04:00:00

And, of course, if he *does* race online, at VROC or anywhere else, GPaL
will suit his needs perfectly. GPaL is designed to address the needs of both
segments of the GPL community!

Jack Rambo

www.RaceLive.com/GPaL

Joe Dawso

A GPaL Question?

by Joe Dawso » Tue, 18 May 1999 04:00:00


No, No Adam, it's not useless......because it's not. The question I asked,
and received no answer to, was "is it essential" Adam, it is essential if
you are setting up your own servers and need an interface..........ok.

Question #2 was....."how this is going to interface with Spyboy or VROC. "
answer:

"With regard to use of VROC/Spy Boy, GPaL will certainly not prevent you
from
enjoying either. In fact, if you're hosting a VROC race, GPaL will make that
process a lot easier and much more flexible."

Now, do you think this answered that question?

Question #3: Is irc chat included ?
Answer:
......................................................................

I was not complaining as Mr. Rambo implied. I only said i didnt need a space
shuttle cabin approach to switch to f3 and a setup, and since i don't host
most is usless to ME.

Now the other 90% of Mr. Rambo's reply really had nothing to do with
answering the questions in my post, only served to draw attention away from
them. Im not sure im as enthusiastic about it the way Mr. Pabst is, but it
does look great.

Mr. Rambo encourages responses to his new toy and he encourages questions. I
only asked three.

Mr. Aytons reply was classic and very well thought out and did not deviate
from the subject and sooooooooo with that

Can you clarify?...........................Jack?

C

.

Chris Schlette

A GPaL Question?

by Chris Schlette » Tue, 18 May 1999 04:00:00

And it even has TABS!  How can you say no now?


Magnus

A GPaL Question?

by Magnus » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00


>I was wondering the same thing myself.  Seems useless.

Well, if it is useless. DON'T USE IT. That is very simple. No one is forcing
this on you.

/Magnus

Jack Ramb

A GPaL Question?

by Jack Ramb » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

Mike...

I have to say I'm stunned and disappointed. This "I'm God" thing is
unbelievable. I, personally, have no idea of what you're talking about and
invite you to reply by posting quotes from "adverti***ts" wherein I
suggest, seek, or imply any god-like status.

I apologize if I have offended you or anyone else. I have simply tried to
promote a product, GPaL, for which I have a great deal of enthusiasm. If I
convey my genuine passion for GPaL's features, I see that as marketing,
not personal chest-beating.

You see, I'm just one guy who has spent a lot of time in front of the screen
writing code for an application (GPL) that I think hung the moon. I don't
have a big, nameless marketing department in the adjacent wing to promote my
product in anonymity. So when you see an "adverti***t" (generally in the
form of an RAS post or a news item on a sim racing news site) announcing
something I'm doing, you normally see my name at the bottom.

To give you an even better feel for my sensitivity on this issue, I'll also
share a couple more things with you. First, I generally attempt to avoid the
use of "I" as much as possible in ever piece I write (e.g. "GPaL will do
xyz" wins out every time over "I've given you the ability to do xyz").
Secondly, though I feel bad in that I sometimes have not acknowledged the
many kind words that people have bestowed upon me, GPaL, or the NTT series,
I have frequently chosen not to respond to many of their posts specifically
to minimize the amount of attention that is focused on me personally. (To
all those kind souls: Please don't think for a minute that your generous
words aren't appreciated! Thank you for each and every one!) So it seems, as
the expression goes, "Sometimes you just can't win for losing."

The really sad thing here is that there are probably many talented people
out there that see these kinds of attacks and simply decide not to
contribute because they know they don't have the constitution for it. It's a
needless loss and as long as it continues the sim racing community will be
the poorer for it.

Hope this clears up any misperceptions.

Jack Rambo

www.RaceLive.com/GPaL

Michael Barlo

A GPaL Question?

by Michael Barlo » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00


> Mike...

> I have to say I'm stunned and disappointed. This "I'm God" thing is
> unbelievable. I, personally, have no idea of what you're talking about and
> invite you to reply by posting quotes from "adverti***ts" wherein I
> suggest, seek, or imply any god-like status.

> I apologize if I have offended you or anyone else. I have simply tried to
> promote a product, GPaL, for which I have a great deal of enthusiasm. If I
> convey my genuine passion for GPaL's features, I see that as marketing,
> not personal chest-beating.

    Read the post..  I was all for you building a program like this!  Next, I
did say that "maybe I read the adds wrong"!

    I have no problem with that!  Most everybody here has there name at the
bottom of a post!  Or at the very least, in there return address.

> To give you an even better feel for my sensitivity on this issue, I'll also
> share a couple more things with you. First, I generally attempt to avoid the
> use of "I" as much as possible in ever piece I write (e.g. "GPaL will do
> xyz" wins out every time over "I've given you the ability to do xyz").
> Secondly, though I feel bad in that I sometimes have not acknowledged the
> many kind words that people have bestowed upon me, GPaL, or the NTT series,
> I have frequently chosen not to respond to many of their posts specifically
> to minimize the amount of attention that is focused on me personally. (To
> all those kind souls: Please don't think for a minute that your generous
> words aren't appreciated! Thank you for each and every one!) So it seems, as
> the expression goes, "Sometimes you just can't win for losing."

> The really sad thing here is that there are probably many talented people
> out there that see these kinds of attacks and simply decide not to
> contribute because they know they don't have the constitution for it. It's a
> needless loss and as long as it continues the sim racing community will be
> the poorer for it.

> Hope this clears up any misperceptions.

> Jack Rambo

> www.RaceLive.com/GPaL

    What the hell is with this?  You're jumping into an argument when there is
no argument.  Read my other posts and you'll see that I was NEVER against you.
The only post that was against GPal was not against GPal, but against all those
arguing that other  people are arguing about GPal, when the fact is that some
people simply asked a question and wanted some information.  As far as this GOD
thing... I did say that I might have read the adds wrong.
--
=========================================
Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
=========================================
Member of R.O.R. 1999
http://www.racesimcentral.net/~marknjess/ror.html
=========================================
Racing online with the help of......

Race Communications Association
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Holodyne Engineering

Mystic Music

  mikeba.vcf
< 1K Download
Michael Barlo

A GPaL Question?

by Michael Barlo » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

    Again, Maybe I read your re-post to me wrong.  I apologies for this, I'm having
a very bad day and it's apparently showing in my posts.

Mike Barlow

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
=========================================
Member of R.O.R. 1999
http://www.pivot.net/~marknjess/ror.html
=========================================
Racing online with the help of......

Race Communications Association
http://members.xoom.com/RCA/toc.html

Holodyne Engineering

Mystic Music

  mikeba.vcf
< 1K Download
Jo

A GPaL Question?

by Jo » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00


>    What the hell is with this?  You're jumping into an argument when there is
>no argument.  Read my other posts and you'll see that I was NEVER against you.

You said his words seemed to be marketing himself "as a God". If
that's not an insult I don't know what is. It was way over the line to
a guy who is volunteering is time and donating what appears to be a
very useful program to the sim racing community. You owe him an
apology.

As for the "I might have read it wrong" part, well what good is that?
How would you feel if someone said "Hey, you seem like an *** to
me. But hey, maybe it's just me reading you wrong!"? Is that not an
insult? It sure as hell is where I come from.

Joe

SteveBla

A GPaL Question?

by SteveBla » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00


>>I guess I feel a little compelled to offset the potential damage done by a

few reckless comments made by individuals who haven't really gained a
sufficient understanding of a product but nonetheless choose to publicly
lambaste it.<<

No kidding.  Jeeez, this is a tough crowd.  You can't even GIVE stuff away!
Guess everyone's just in a funk over N3...........

Hang in there JR,

Steve B.

remove "edy" from address for email


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.