rec.autos.simulators

A GPaL Question?

Ron Ayto

A GPaL Question?

by Ron Ayto » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

Hi Jack,  i am not so sure they were actually complaining about
recieving GPal for free, or that the effort and time you have invested
in GPal was not appreciated, but they did voice their concerns about
how GPal would interact with SpyBoy and VROC, which i feel was a fair
question.
The ammount of work that has been invested into VROC 1.2 and the new
version of SpyBoy, was perhaps a measure of concern to some people as
well, considering that VROC 1.2 and the new SpyBoy also have all the
added features of your GPal program and are just waiting for the
release of GPL 1.1 to be able to take advantage of all the new
additions.
A few good people have invested a lot of time and effort into VROC and
SpyBoy, and obvious concerns about compatability issues are only
obvious.
Thank's Jack for letting us know that GPal will in no way upset the
workings of VROC and SpyBoy  and for sharing that information with the
readers on RAS.
I wish you all the best with your GPal launch.

Also, in response to the post by rrevved, everyone is intitled to
his/her opinion...    Some people just have a immature way of showing
it.  Your response to a legitimate question/concern about GPal
rrevved, shows it up well...
Regards,
Ron



Ron Ayto

A GPaL Question?

by Ron Ayto » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00


Hi rrevved, the immaturity level was asigned to you simply because of
your need to flame a couple of legitimate ***ies regarding the use of
GPal when interacted with VROC/SpyBoy, with an objective description of
the parentage of the guys in question...
If you don't race on-line through VROC, then by all means GPal should
suit your needs perfectly.
Cheers,
Ron

Ron Ayto

A GPaL Question?

by Ron Ayto » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

Hi Jack, i am sorry, but at this stage i can't clarify, as i am not
going to get into a who knows what debate on a public forum, suffice to
say that i am also under a non-dislosure agreement and some things
should not be discussed on a public forum untill all partys involved
have agreed to releasing the information on a general level, however
you are right in regards to your comments that i do not know all that
is in the release version GPal.  
I am simply going on what i know will be possible to implement through
the GPL 1.1 patch when it becomes available.
I did feel though that the ***ies regarding SpyBoy/VROC and the
compatability issues with GPal was a fair question.
It wasn't just the few posts here that made me decide to ***into this
thread, but i have also been asked numerous times on GPL Chat about the
ramifications of GPal interacting with SpyBoy, and as i didn't know the
answer to that question, i thought a response from you regarding
compatability issues would ease a few minds.
I can't answer questions i don't know the answer to, hence the reason i
replied to this post to start with.
Cheers,
Ron



> Hey, Ron.

> Little curious how you're certain that "VROC 1.2 and the new SpyBoy
also
> have all the added features of your GPal [sic GPaL] program" since
all the
> features of GPaL haven't been revealed yet. To date, I've revealed
the
> contents of one of eight tabs in the GPaL interface. And one of those
tab is
> marked "TBA!"

> Can you clarify?

> Jack Rambo

> www.RaceLive.com/GPaL

Ian Parke

A GPaL Question?

by Ian Parke » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

How can it be useless???

No more messing with INI files is singularly worth the download.
It's my understanding that GPaL isn't designed to replace VROC or GSB, it's
an interface for quickly and easily adjusting the game settings for whatever
you require, eg. graphics settings can be altered from a dropdown list to
suit either training, online or offline racing, Core.ini files can be
selected to suit different hosting purposes.

IMHO GPaL will be a bonus to the already great GPL and can only help people
to get more from the sim.
It may not be essential but will be a great advantage.

Keep up the good work Jack !!!!
--
Ian Parker

ICQ   21772592


> I was wondering the same thing myself.  Seems useless.



> > Well, with the screen shot of GPaL looking like the***pit of a 737, I
> see
> > nothing about how this is going to interface with Spyboy or VROC. I
mean,
> I
> > would give up neither of these applications to run GPal. Looks to me
like
> > you can do eveything thing you need to do now, without this. I mean,
load
> > spyboy, chat with everyone and run a quick race or 2 like pretty quick.
> How
> > long does it take to change from F! to F3 and load your setup? 2
seconds?
> > The 1.1 patch will have all these GPal parameters included, and lets
face
> > it, how often are you going to be utilizing all this? Is irc chat
included
> ?

> > Is this GPal essential? VROC and Spyboy are.

> > Just questions...ok?

> > C

Ian Parke

A GPaL Question?

by Ian Parke » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

How can it be useless???

No more messing with INI files is singularly worth the download.
It's my understanding that GPaL isn't designed to replace VROC or GSB, it's
an interface for quickly and easily adjusting the game settings for whatever
you require, eg. graphics settings can be altered from a dropdown list to
suit either training, online or offline racing, Core.ini files can be
selected to suit different hosting purposes.

IMHO GPaL will be a bonus to the already great GPL and can only help people
to get more from the sim.
It may not be essential but will be a great advantage.

Keep up the good work Jack !!!!
--
Ian Parker

ICQ   21772592


> I was wondering the same thing myself.  Seems useless.



> > Well, with the screen shot of GPaL looking like the***pit of a 737, I
> see
> > nothing about how this is going to interface with Spyboy or VROC. I
mean,
> I
> > would give up neither of these applications to run GPal. Looks to me
like
> > you can do eveything thing you need to do now, without this. I mean,
load
> > spyboy, chat with everyone and run a quick race or 2 like pretty quick.
> How
> > long does it take to change from F! to F3 and load your setup? 2
seconds?
> > The 1.1 patch will have all these GPal parameters included, and lets
face
> > it, how often are you going to be utilizing all this? Is irc chat
included
> ?

> > Is this GPal essential? VROC and Spyboy are.

> > Just questions...ok?

> > C

Jo

A GPaL Question?

by Jo » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00


>Looking through a mountain of positive response, I haven't found anyone
>that has a problem with having all the frequently modified GPL settings
>available in a single screen.

Jack, I'm sure I speak for many when I say your work on a project like
GPaL is very much appreciated by the sim racing community.

And just from the single screen shot I've seen, it looks incredibly
useful. As a user interface designer myself I know how much thought
and expertise goes into making an efficient, clean user interface.
There are many mamy ways to do it wrong, and a few ways to do it
right. GPal looks very, very well done. I hope you're proud of it, you
should be.

Joe

Jack Ramb

A GPaL Question?

by Jack Ramb » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

I think you're avoiding the point, Ron. The only problem that I had with
your post was your unqualified statement that "VROC 1.2 and the new SpyBoy
also have all the added features of your GPal [sic GPaL] program."

Some of GPaL's "added features" are tied to GPL 1.1 and some are not. Since
only a fraction of GPaL's feature set has been unveiled at this point, you
can't possibly suggest that the programs you mentioned include all of GPaL's
features. Simple. Your statement is entirely inaccurate and misleading to
RAS readers.

By making the details of the GPaL interface available as it's under
development, the GPL community has the opportunity to evaluate the design
themselves and to provide input. I'm disappointed when that process is
short-circuited by unsubstantiated statements.

Jack Rambo

www.RaceLive.com/GPaL

Jack Ramb

A GPaL Question?

by Jack Ramb » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

Oh, Mr. Schletter, your GPaL is served. Did you order that with tabs or
without? ;)

Jack

www.RaceLive.com/GPaL

Ron Ayto

A GPaL Question?

by Ron Ayto » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

You think i am avoiding the point Jack ??
This is what i stated:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The ammount of work that has been invested into VROC 1.2 and the
newversion of SpyBoy, was perhaps a measure of concern to some people
as well, considering that VROC 1.2 and the new SpyBoy also have all the
added features of your GPal program and are just waiting for the
release of GPL 1.1 to be able to take advantage of all the new
additions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

No where in that section did i state that new versions of VROC & SpyBoy
had ALL of the features, YET to be added OR revealed in your GPal
program..
I started that they have all the added features of GPal, and they do
have..  How can i know what you are going to add to GPal in the furure
?
What i do know is what you have made available for viewing, apart from
the adjustable Ai strength is also available in the new Versions of
VROC and SpyBoy..
Maybe i should have made myself clearer on that point, rather than let
you drag it all out of proportion.
I know you understood my post Jack, and why you have to try to turn
this post into a public relations promotional feature for Gpal is
anyone's guess.
I wasn't putting down you, or your program, but as i stated, i simply
entered this discussion about the compatability issues with the
programs in question.
I have never made any unsubstantiated statements, as you so  elequently
put it, but simply wanted to know, like a lot of others, what your
ultimate intentions regarding compatability issues were and how GPal
was going to interact with VROC and SpyBoy.
I am not giving you any more publicity on RAS, if you want to take this
further, feel free to email me with your complaints or ***ies.
Cheers,
Ron



> I think you're avoiding the point, Ron. The only problem that I had
with
> your post was your unqualified statement that "VROC 1.2 and the new
SpyBoy
> also have all the added features of your GPal [sic GPaL] program."

> Some of GPaL's "added features" are tied to GPL 1.1 and some are not.
Since
> only a fraction of GPaL's feature set has been unveiled at this
point, you
> can't possibly suggest that the programs you mentioned include all of
GPaL's
> features. Simple. Your statement is entirely inaccurate and
misleading to
> RAS readers.

> By making the details of the GPaL interface available as it's under
> development, the GPL community has the opportunity to evaluate the
design
> themselves and to provide input. I'm disappointed when that process
is
> short-circuited by unsubstantiated statements.

> Jack Rambo

> www.RaceLive.com/GPaL

Matthew Birger Knutse

A GPaL Question?

by Matthew Birger Knutse » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

 My goal was, and is, to make the GPL

And we thank you for it Jack! Shake it off, and keep up the brilliant
jobbing!
Just wait until after the first release, you'll have tons of thank you's
with even bigger exclamation marks!

All best,

Matt

--

Matthew Knutsen

"The Art of Legends" - GPL add-ons
http://www.cheekracing.electra.no/GPL/

Remco Moe

A GPaL Question?

by Remco Moe » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00


>    I wanted to ask the same questions But didn't because of the way GPal has
>been advertised.  Seems like he is giving away everything that's already in GPL
>and just slapping his name on it.  He did forget some important things though..
>Chat! Chat! and Chat!.
>    But, then again,  If he can make this GPal work and make him look like a GOD
>at the same time.. I say, go for it.

Well, it seems that Papyrus doesn't agree with you. (This if Jack's
comments are true, but then again, why should Jack lie?)

About the chat, I hope that if Jack  will include it, it will be
gamma.net based.

Remco

c0ldfusi0

A GPaL Question?

by c0ldfusi0 » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

After reading the posts in this thread, I just HAD to yell: "WHAT THE HELL
IS GOING ON HERE?!!??!".    I am a software developer and GPL *** and
know what it must have taken time-wise for Jack to take on such a project.
Mr. Rambo is offering it FOR FREE to anyone who wants it and it trying to
(a) take a part in fostering the GPL community (a good thing) and (b) make
GPL easier to use (also a good thing).

Why, oh why, does anyone on this newsgroup feel it is somehow necessary to
give him sh*t for it?  I have seen many newsgroups chase helpful people away
(like the developers of the games themselves (can you say c.s.i.p.g.f-s?)
because a vocal minority feels the need to bash instead of offer helpful
advice and comments.  If you don't feel that what Jack has created will be
of use to you, don't download it.  Thoughtless comments serve no purpose.  I
feel grateful that Jack has decided that there was value in the opinions of
this newsgroup that might help in the development of his tool.  He must have
been surprised when, instead of getting helpful comments, he got a raft of
sh*t.  Geez.  Some people...

Jack, if some of the nitwits on this group don't want the fruit of your many
hours of labor, send it to me.  It looks like an immensely helpful utility.
Please don't leave the group and, as someone else said here, "don't let the
bastards get you down".

-Jeff H.

Stephen Gree

A GPaL Question?

by Stephen Gree » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

Girl girls girls girls girl...!!! Let's take this outside, handbags at 10 paces maybe??

On a serious note, and I really should not get involved, but as an impartial outsider, there does seem to be some questions that still need addressing.

The question regarding how GPaL interacts with GSB & VROC still seems to remain unanswered. Dose GPal pop up automatically when we select a race from either GSB or VROC? or will we need to click on an Icon? Once we have made our GPaL selections, will GPL be launched automatically?, or will there be another key press involved? Am I even in the right ballpark with these questions?, until Jack give us a little more detail, no one knows.....!

As for what functions are in GSB 1.1/VROC 1.2 verses what will be in GPaL, and what if any "doubling-up" of features will exist, we will all just have to wait and see, (May 31st for GPaL and who-knows-when for GSB/VROC and GPL 1.1).

And Ron, if you are privy to some insider information regarding the content of GSB/VROC, then I respectfully suggest that you honour your non-disclosure agreement, and keep quiet, as your dropping of hints as to what will be included is only confusing things further.

As for the "Public Relations" exercise for GPaL, I'm sure that Jack is only tryin to see what interest exists in what will essentially be "freeware". Where I believe things have gone a little out of control is in the fact that if you ask 100 people what they want, they will always want 100 different things..!! Maybe less hype would equal less unwarranted criticism, (sorry Jack...!!)

I for one cannot wait for GPal, or GPL 1.1 / GSB 1.1, and I am in awe of those people that make these thing possible, especially considering it's all for free...... so I suggest that we all just sit back and wait for the release of these products, before making any judgements or jumping to any wrong conclusions......

PLEASE END THIS THREAD HERE.

SteveG


>On Tue, 18 May 1999 05:03:54 GMT,


>>I know you understood my post Jack, and why you have to try to turn
>>this post into a public relations promotional feature for Gpal is
>>anyone's guess.

>Well thats a pretty damned *** response, if you ask me.

>Ron, here is a very simple idea, which I hope won't be lost on you.
>If you don't want to run GPAL, don't click the little icon.

>See how easy that is?

>--
>// rrevved posts from mindspring dot com

Mike Newlan

A GPaL Question?

by Mike Newlan » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

I have to agree Jack.  Keep up the good work in spite of those that need to
treat others in a less than admirable way to enjoy life.  Those of us that
appreciate efforts like yours will be here, and looking forward to any help we
can give.

Keep me on you list
Mikey
Team Jesus Racing


> After reading the posts in this thread, I just HAD to yell: "WHAT THE HELL
> IS GOING ON HERE?!!??!".    I am a software developer and GPL *** and
> know what it must have taken time-wise for Jack to take on such a project.
> Mr. Rambo is offering it FOR FREE to anyone who wants it and it trying to
> (a) take a part in fostering the GPL community (a good thing) and (b) make
> GPL easier to use (also a good thing).

> Why, oh why, does anyone on this newsgroup feel it is somehow necessary to
> give him sh*t for it?  I have seen many newsgroups chase helpful people away
> (like the developers of the games themselves (can you say c.s.i.p.g.f-s?)
> because a vocal minority feels the need to bash instead of offer helpful
> advice and comments.  If you don't feel that what Jack has created will be
> of use to you, don't download it.  Thoughtless comments serve no purpose.  I
> feel grateful that Jack has decided that there was value in the opinions of
> this newsgroup that might help in the development of his tool.  He must have
> been surprised when, instead of getting helpful comments, he got a raft of
> sh*t.  Geez.  Some people...

> Jack, if some of the nitwits on this group don't want the fruit of your many
> hours of labor, send it to me.  It looks like an immensely helpful utility.
> Please don't leave the group and, as someone else said here, "don't let the
> bastards get you down".

> -Jeff H.

Michael Barlo

A GPaL Question?

by Michael Barlo » Wed, 19 May 1999 04:00:00

    Maybe I wrote that wrong..  I was trying to say... The way he has been wording
the adds for Gpal,  It seems as though he is trying to get a "I'm God" idea across.

    Maybe I've been reading the adds the wrong way. It just seemed to be trying to
get that idea across.  I meant no flame by my post.  I do wish him well with the
add-on.



> >    I wanted to ask the same questions But didn't because of the way GPal has
> >been advertised.  Seems like he is giving away everything that's already in GPL
> >and just slapping his name on it.  He did forget some important things though..
> >Chat! Chat! and Chat!.

> >    But, then again,  If he can make this GPal work and make him look like a GOD
> >at the same time.. I say, go for it.

> Well, it seems that Papyrus doesn't agree with you. (This if Jack's
> comments are true, but then again, why should Jack lie?)

> About the chat, I hope that if Jack  will include it, it will be
> gamma.net based.

> Remco

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
=========================================
Member of R.O.R. 1999
http://www.pivot.net/~marknjess/ror.html
=========================================
Racing online with the help of......

Race Communications Association
http://members.xoom.com/RCA/toc.html

Holodyne Engineering

Mystic Music

  mikeba.vcf
< 1K Download

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.