rec.autos.simulators

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

Ken Nicols

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by Ken Nicols » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00

On Tue, 27 Apr 1999 13:28:26 -0400, "Keith Meyer"


>Okay, let me make this perfectly clear: I do NOT advocate the banning of
>video games. I am pretty much a first amendment absolutist when it comes to
>these kinds of things. Neither do I think that video games (or movies, or
>music, or skywriting for that matter) can CAUSE a person to do the kind of
>thing that happened in Colorado.

>That being said, 60 Minutes had a very intteresting story on this issue last
>weekend, featuring an ex-military man who now does seminars for the military
>on the 'psychology of killing'. He had enough points that I am at least
>disturbed by this issue.

I'm sure if you looked hard enough you could find a psychologist to
blame anything from gun availability to eating too many hamburgers.

>To elaborate:


>>Second, where can I purchase a gun that has a mouse interface, and a
>>remote-control active-suspension powered skateboard, controlled via
>>the same mouse, that allows me to slide sideways without any gun
>>shake.

>Again, agreed to some extent. I think the argument is maybe more against the
>arcade type games where you get a plastic gun to shoot with.

I don't go into arcades much, but most of them are based around you
playing a cop or soldier shooting the bad guys with rather
unrealisting pistols or machine guns. Correct me if I'm wrong, but
there's no sawn-off shotgun-equipped Postal look-alike or
Carmageddon-style driving game. I loved Carmageddon, BTW, the OTT
physics and grannie pedestrians were such fun!

I believe they have a very heavily modified version. Apparently you've
just a few HPs, one or two shots and you're dead, no Stim-Packs and
certainly no SPACE BAR respawn. Apparently it's to teach the basics of
squad-level tactics in a cost-effective manner.

You can get lots of kit to enhance your flying experience, yokes, big
monitors, pilot seats, etc, at much less than the $5M or so a
full-blown hydraulic surround vision system would cost. Flying is a
very technical business, and the sims simulate all this business.
FPSes don't require you to reload your weapon correctly - Quake
doesn't have controls to move your two arms, open breech over knee,
get ammo out of belt, move into position, close weapon, etc, etc.

Yes, that's why I play racing sims. However, in my experience, they
don't translate very well. First, I am pretty bad at Quake, but we had
an office away-day at an activity centre, and I beat everyone, game
players and non-players, at both real live shotgun clay pigeon
shooting (this was the very first time I, and most others, had ever
used a real firearm - we were in the UK) and archery, again, the first
time with a bow. Second, at the same day out, we had Honda Pilot
racing - off-road buggy things - I was second fastest there as I think
my knowledge of car handling and racing enabled me to slide the thing
about a bit more. Finally, I went on a weekend away to Germany with a
bunch of F1GP fans: I was about the worst at F1GP, yet at one of the
go-kart tracks we visited I was just a whisker behind beating an
Austrian champion karter. I only ride karts about once a year, if even
that.

Tabloid hype over facts. Technically, yes, it simulates killing, just
as films (or even TV News shows) contain
how-to-actually-kill-in-real-life reenactments, or for TV News, from
what I hear about US TV, probably real life real deaths.

No I'm not. The point you, or the Talking Head on 60 Minutes, are
trying to make is that Quake somehow models real-life. Where's the
SPACE BAR in coffins?

I think I read somewhere that the guys involved made a video for a
school drama class or something about a year ago that involved them
killing people in the school.

Quake does not simulate recoil, hand shake, etc, and real life guns do
not have the benefit of big white crosses (OK, maybe a laser sight
does) that shows you where you are going to hit.

Did he also have any real-life firearms range training? Just as I be
more likely to trust a pilot who'd had 10 hours in a real plane versus
100 hours in MSFS. Of course, if she'd had both experiences, I'd
probably trust her more.

Are you going to extend the same level of supervision to TV and video?

No, because I can clearly see that Quake is just a diversion. My
chances of being confused for a mutant space cadet are rather small.
If Quake III comes out with slo-mo arty and***replays every time
you get a fraq, then yes, I will be uneasy.

I think they are now trying to sue games companies too. Video games,
however, don't have the high degree of realism that movies do.

Ken

Trey Beh

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by Trey Beh » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00


>I have an even beter suggession lets blame the comms. or how about the
>democrats; republicans, liberals. do you like placing the blame? this is
>completely rediculus the blame if any is on the american society

Sounds as though you're disagreeing with me, and then agreeing with me. Either
way, we have a serious situation on our hands. I wasn't "placing blame;" I was
establishing RESPONSIBILITY for this tragic nonsense.

I happen to be around quite a few parents and their children every day. I've
wondered for the past few years how these parents can idly stand by and let
their children run riot without any correction or supervision whatsoever. The
mystery was cleared up when I heard a parent utter the most ridiculous
philosophy imaginable: "They're little spirits, and shouldn't be inhibited in
any way." Well, spirits come in all stripes, and some are downright evil unless
taught to respect the "spirits" with whom they share the world. Hell, even
puppies are trained not to pee on the carpet.

To nudge this thread back on topic, we stand to lose our rights to uncensored
media and video games (and to own firearms, if that's your thing) if idiots are
going to use them as re-enforcement of their unchecked ***s on society.

It all starts with parents' obligation to RAISE their kids---not just allow
them to reach ***hood  with the mentality of children.

Back to my Lotus,
Trey Behan

Keith Meye

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by Keith Meye » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00


>On Tue, 27 Apr 1999 10:00:28 -0400, "Keith Meyer"

>>Agreed, but computer games have an interactive element that movies and
music
>>don't. They also allow people to practice the skills that make them more
>>effective killers.

>I race GPL and I don't drive like a madman on the highways, I play
>Zelda and I've yet to slash anyone with a sword - I've played Quake
>for days on end and never felt the compulsion to blow anyone away with
>a shotgun.

>The compunction to behave in that manner comes from elsewhere, and to
>conveniently pin it onto computer games is to miss the point entirely.

Agreed, the compuction comes from elsewhere. I've played these games, too,
and have never experienced the urge to go on a killing spree.

Also true, and I don't advocate the banning of ANYTHING because of a few nut
cases (with the possible exception of guns themselves - why give these
idiots the means to carry out their sick fantasies?) What I am uncomfortable
with is giving these people access to their own personal 'training ground',
and the ability to feed their urges. What's the answer if we don't ban the
games (and I don't think we should...)? I don't know. I CAN say that I won't
let my kids have a computer in their own room where I can't tell what
they're doing with it. (And no, not just because of games, and no, not a TV
either...)

Absolutely!!! The argument is always 'guns don't kill people, people do'.
Bullsh*t... why give these idiots the means to do it more quickly and
efficiently...

Keith (trying to get off my soapbox now...)

George R Barto

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by George R Barto » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00

Hi All,

I know this doesn't really belong here, But......
I was on a jury a few years back for a drug and gun peddling *** and I was
amazed that ANYBODY could walk into a Bait and Tackle shop in Ohio sign a form
saying they are not a criminal and purchase 21 hand guns with cash and walk out !
No waiting, no background check or anything. Yeah, I think something is wrong
here !!!
George


> On Tue, 27 Apr 1999 10:00:28 -0400, "Keith Meyer"

> >Agreed, but computer games have an interactive element that movies and music
> >don't. They also allow people to practice the skills that make them more
> >effective killers.

> I race GPL and I don't drive like a madman on the highways, I play
> Zelda and I've yet to slash anyone with a sword - I've played Quake
> for days on end and never felt the compulsion to blow anyone away with
> a shotgun.

> The compunction to behave in that manner comes from elsewhere, and to
> conveniently pin it onto computer games is to miss the point entirely.
> Ask yourself why it is that games like Quake and such *** are so
> popular and you're beginning to look in the right place - deal with
> the cause, not the effect.

> In any case, banning a computer game when anyone can wander into a
> shop and buy a gun seems, to me at least, to be missing the point a
> wee bit!

> Cheers!
> John

Jim Moor

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by Jim Moor » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00

I've lived in Indiana all of my life and have taken many walks in the forest
(us "harum-scarum manics" call them "the woods")  I've never once been poked
by an arrow nor do I know of a single person who has.  I watch my Pacers get
beat by the Orlando Magic last night.  At halftime, all 16,500 of us broke out
our *** rifles and titanium-tipped arrows and had a rippin' up, kick-ass,
good ol' Hoosier hillbilly time!!!  Not really, although an older gentleman
did take a *** tumble down the stairs during a timeout.

It sounds as though that if I ever ventured to Scotland that I would probably
be depicted as the "ugly Hoosier."  I may fall back on my sterotyping
instincts and tell my friends back in Indiana that everyone in Scotland is a
"kilt wearin' fag."  Coming from the outside, it may be quite shocking. No, I
doubt it.  I'll likely take my chances and just stay here, cruise the country
roads in my MG, daydreaming of Scotland while keeping an open mind it's locals
and avoiding such idiotic stereotypes and paranoia.

Have your friend email me, John.  I'll show him where it's safe to walk.
Unbelievable.

Cheers,

Jim


> A friend of mine moved from Scotland to Indiana a few years ago (it's
> a long story) and I remember him telling me how, to him at least,
> everyone seemed like a gun-totin', harum-scarum maniac - coming from
> outside it was quite shocking. He was describing to me how in
> "bow-hunting season" you basically couldn't go for a walk in the
> forest for fear of being turned into a walking pincushion. He also
> mentioned that most of the people used tungsten tipped arrows in their
> bows (it could have been titanium, I forget). The question is, WHY?
> When was the last time a deer had a kevlar skin?

> Bizarre....

> Cheers!
> John

DAVI

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by DAVI » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00

Both of my parents would wonder what it was.  Also I am not saying
snooping.  the barrel was in plain sight on a dresser.  If anyone walked
into room it would be seen, and probly was





> You advocate the snooping of kids 17 and 18 years old by their parents.
If,
> during my last year of school or first of Uni, I found my mother checking
> out my stuff I'd have gone ballistic. Who's to say that the parents would
> recognise a sawn off barrel? My father might, but my mother wouldn't.

> M

> >How bout the kids parents. Maybe the blame should be squarely put there.
> I
> >know I would know if any of my kids had a sawed off shotgun barrel on
his
> >dresser.  

> >Also, I saw maybe five minute of "Natural Born Killers", what a waste of
> >tape.

> >Dave

ymenar

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by ymenar » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00


I don't understand your point...

I've seen all those movies, most of them are masterpieces of art.  Kubrick
has done one of the best disturbing movie of all time with A Clockwork
Orange, Tarantino started the "new style/old style" cinema with Reservoir
Dogs, and NBK, even though it's not Stone's best movie, has some incredible
memorable scenes.

I've seen A.C.Orange multiple times, and haven't yet become a mass-***er.
99.999999999999999999999% of the people who saw those movies are all like
me.  So your telling we are more entitled to be *** after watching a
piece of art than playing a game where you interact and show emotions
towards ***? (because a movie is art, remember).

Just stop everybody pointing fingers. It's a complex macro-society problem
in America.  It's made of all those little micro-systems like movies, games,
gun laws, parents negligence, awareness, school, young ***agers social
skills, medias, etc...

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
-- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-- SimRacing Online http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-- Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
-- May the Downforce be with you...

"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."

John Walla

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by John Walla » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00



I'm sure if I ask him nowadays he would say much the same thing - such
a reaction can only come from the contrast of moving to somewhere for
the first time and the culture shock experienced. My first time ever
in the U.S. I flew into Portland, an impressionable ***ager. Shortly
after landing I took the underground rail link between the two
terminals and as it was late at night it was almost empty - just me
and a security guard with what looked like a cannon holstered around
his waist. A serious shock for me, since guns were only what you see
in the movies as far as I was concerned, and in the UK people working
in security jobs are generally not considered as the sharpest tool in
the box (horrible stereotype, I know). I was somewhat perturbed.

Other than people trying to get money from tourists you're unlikely to
see any kilts in Scotland. (Sorry to the Scottish Tourist Board if I'm
shattering any carefully crafted "Braveheart" style illusions!) :-)

I'm sure he knows. After his neighbours advised which guns to buy,
where he could and could not safely shoot intruders etc etc he decided
to ignore everything and do his own thing. As you say, "unbelievable".

Cheers!
John

Ronald Stoe

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by Ronald Stoe » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00




> >Yeah, I'm sure that those nutcases needed Doom to teach them how to use a
> >shotgun. The right to arm bears, where did I read that recently...

> :-) I like that

> A friend of mine moved from Scotland to Indiana a few years ago (it's
> a long story) and I remember him telling me how, to him at least,
> everyone seemed like a gun-totin', harum-scarum maniac - coming from

I lived in Florida for three years, and I remember very good how
uncomfortable I felt driving with a co-worker to a nightclub. After
parking the car he said: "Let me just put away the gun.", pulled out
a big handgun and threw it into the glove compartment.

You see it on TV, at the movies, but if you experience gun handling
comparable to owning a cellphone, it's quite scary...

l8er
ronny

--
How to get rid of censorship in German game releases
<http://www.gamesmania.com/german/maniac/freedom/freedom.htm>

          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!

David Ewin

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by David Ewin » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00


> there is absolutely nothing wrong with owning firearms. they problem is too
> many a$$holes have them with out any clue on how to handle the firearm.
> FIREARMS ARE NOT TOYS!!!

I have no problems with people owning certain firearms, but I see absolutely no
justification for the general public's ability to own a weapon like the TEC-9.
This gun, used in the Columbine High School massacre, is a semi-automatic
pistol with a huge ammo clip.  It is very inaccurate and its sole purpose is to
spray as many bullets in as short a period of time as possible.  It has no use
in hunting, target shooting or even self-protection.  The makers of this gun
even advertise it to the criminal element by claiming that it is finger print
resistant.  The TEC-9 is a favorite weapon with gangs and is used quite often
in drive-by shootings.

The fact that the National Rifle Association, and the ***s in the U.S.
Congress on their payroll, actively fight to keep weapons like this in public
circulation is abhorent to me and to most reasonable people.

Sorry for contributing to this off-topic thread, but I live 30 miles from
Columbine High School and know many people who live in Littleton.

Dave Ewing

Jay Wolf

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by Jay Wolf » Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:00:00


>I have no problems with people owning certain firearms, but I see
absolutely no
>justification for the general public's ability to own a weapon like the
TEC-9.
>This gun, used in the Columbine High School massacre, is a semi-automatic
>pistol with a huge ammo clip.  It is very inaccurate and its sole purpose
is to
>spray as many bullets in as short a period of time as possible.  It has no
use
>in hunting, target shooting or even self-protection.  The makers of this
gun
>even advertise it to the criminal element by claiming that it is finger
print
>resistant.  The TEC-9 is a favorite weapon with gangs and is used quite
often
>in drive-by shootings.

>The fact that the National Rifle Association, and the ***s in the U.S.
>Congress on their payroll, actively fight to keep weapons like this in
public
>circulation is abhorent to me and to most reasonable people.

>Sorry for contributing to this off-topic thread, but I live 30 miles from
>Columbine High School and know many people who live in Littleton.

dave-
if you ban any type of gun, what you do is prevent the "good guys" from
possessing them. the "bad guys" will still have them. they don't really give
a damn whether or not they are legal. the point is, they WILL have them, and
they WILL use them. probably even more so, considering they don't have to
worry about being outgunned by the law abiding public. my girlfriend just
bought a 9mm glock with infared sights. it's nice knowing that someone would
have to pay hell if they wanted to attack her. if guns were banned, she
would be defenseless while the baddies wouldn't have anything to worry about
since they would be the only one holding a gun.

j

p.s. - i don't own a gun, but i hope that you do.

John Walla

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by John Walla » Fri, 30 Apr 1999 04:00:00



Oh shit, I've watched all of those movies AND played months of Quake -
someone better lock me up before I do something mental and it is
conveniently blamed on the games.

Movies, games and indeed *** acts themselves are only the symptoms
or, if you like, the results. What has caused such movies to be
popular and *** to be common is where attention needs to be
directed. You could well find that games like Quake are in fact a
channeled outlet for pent-up urges and desires, and in banning such
products people may find rather more public ways to vent these.

Knee jerk reactions without understanding a problem are more likely to
be a quick fix to keep people happy rather than doing any actual good.
Unfortunately that's almost a dictionary definition of "politician".

Cheers!
John

Mark C Dod

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by Mark C Dod » Fri, 30 Apr 1999 04:00:00

What's an outsiders view of the USA.......all the cop shows, action flicks and TV
dramas that feed us an unrelenting view of ***, *** and depressing city
living. Bring back Little House On The Prarie!

How about a Little House On The Prarie sim? (Sorry, just trying to get a little
bit on topic for the group).


> I've lived in Indiana all of my life and have taken many walks in the forest
> (us "harum-scarum manics" call them "the woods")  I've never once been poked
> by an arrow nor do I know of a single person who has.  I watch my Pacers get
> beat by the Orlando Magic last night.  At halftime, all 16,500 of us broke out
> our *** rifles and titanium-tipped arrows and had a rippin' up, kick-ass,
> good ol' Hoosier hillbilly time!!!  Not really, although an older gentleman
> did take a *** tumble down the stairs during a timeout.

> It sounds as though that if I ever ventured to Scotland that I would probably
> be depicted as the "ugly Hoosier."  I may fall back on my sterotyping
> instincts and tell my friends back in Indiana that everyone in Scotland is a
> "kilt wearin' fag."  Coming from the outside, it may be quite shocking. No, I
> doubt it.  I'll likely take my chances and just stay here, cruise the country
> roads in my MG, daydreaming of Scotland while keeping an open mind it's locals
> and avoiding such idiotic stereotypes and paranoia.

> Have your friend email me, John.  I'll show him where it's safe to walk.
> Unbelievable.

> Cheers,

> Jim


> > A friend of mine moved from Scotland to Indiana a few years ago (it's
> > a long story) and I remember him telling me how, to him at least,
> > everyone seemed like a gun-totin', harum-scarum maniac - coming from
> > outside it was quite shocking. He was describing to me how in
> > "bow-hunting season" you basically couldn't go for a walk in the
> > forest for fear of being turned into a walking pincushion. He also
> > mentioned that most of the people used tungsten tipped arrows in their
> > bows (it could have been titanium, I forget). The question is, WHY?
> > When was the last time a deer had a kevlar skin?

> > Bizarre....

> > Cheers!
> > John

Mark C Dod

(really) *VERY* IMPORTANT: PC Games are 100% positive CAMPAIGN

by Mark C Dod » Fri, 30 Apr 1999 04:00:00

Let's look at the experience my wife and I have had with troubled kids. For
years we looked after "Wards Of The State". These were kids who were either
removed from their parents because they were being abused (physically, mentally
and ***ly) or because they were "delinquent" and heading for a life of
crime. (They used to mix both together!).

The kids could come in the front door with a plastic bag, a tube of glue and
announce they were going to get high. As soon as they entered their bedroom
there was nothing we could legally do to stop them. On occasions we knew there
were weopons and/or hard *** in the room but we couldn't confiscate them or
even report the matter to the police.

Why? Because kids have a right to privacy backed up by legislation and law. If
people are to be held resposible for the actions of "mature" ***agers then
allow us to excercise proper supervision wihtout the interference of social
workers and do gooders!

How about a delinquent sim? (lets get back on topic or move this to another
forum!)


> Both of my parents would wonder what it was.  Also I am not saying
> snooping.  the barrel was in plain sight on a dresser.  If anyone walked
> into room it would be seen, and probly was





> > You advocate the snooping of kids 17 and 18 years old by their parents.
> If,
> > during my last year of school or first of Uni, I found my mother checking

> > out my stuff I'd have gone ballistic. Who's to say that the parents would

> > recognise a sawn off barrel? My father might, but my mother wouldn't.

> > M

> > >How bout the kids parents. Maybe the blame should be squarely put there.

> > I
> > >know I would know if any of my kids had a sawed off shotgun barrel on
> his
> > >dresser.

> > >Also, I saw maybe five minute of "Natural Born Killers", what a waste of
> > >tape.

> > >Dave


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.