rec.autos.simulators

slow mo in gpl 1.1....

pez

slow mo in gpl 1.1....

by pez » Mon, 12 Jul 1999 04:00:00

i get slow mo every now and again with the new patch.  The level of
graphical complexity doesnt make any difference.  I can run it full graphics
and get slow mo, and i can run it min graphics and get slow mo.  without ff,
voodoo1 p200 (i know its slow, but i can get 35fps min graphics 1.0, but
with 1.1 it goes slow mo every now and again.....and ive reloaded the old
ras3dfx from the cd....).  maybe i should just junk the patch and reinstall
1.0????

pez

Roger La

slow mo in gpl 1.1....

by Roger La » Mon, 12 Jul 1999 04:00:00

Definitely getting the same problem.

p450 64mb ram, MSFF wheel.

Roger


>i get slow mo every now and again with the new patch.  The level of
>graphical complexity doesnt make any difference.  I can run it full
graphics
>and get slow mo, and i can run it min graphics and get slow mo.  without
ff,
>voodoo1 p200 (i know its slow, but i can get 35fps min graphics 1.0, but
>with 1.1 it goes slow mo every now and again.....and ive reloaded the old
>ras3dfx from the cd....).  maybe i should just junk the patch and reinstall
>1.0????

>pez

Ren

slow mo in gpl 1.1....

by Ren » Tue, 13 Jul 1999 04:00:00

Downloading latest drivers from www.nvdia.com gained me
about 6 frames per second

Rene

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999 23:16:39 +0800, "Roger Lai"


>Definitely getting the same problem.

>p450 64mb ram, MSFF wheel.

>Roger


>>i get slow mo every now and again with the new patch.  The level of
>>graphical complexity doesnt make any difference.  I can run it full
>graphics
>>and get slow mo, and i can run it min graphics and get slow mo.  without
>ff,
>>voodoo1 p200 (i know its slow, but i can get 35fps min graphics 1.0, but
>>with 1.1 it goes slow mo every now and again.....and ive reloaded the old
>>ras3dfx from the cd....).  maybe i should just junk the patch and reinstall
>>1.0????

>>pez


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.