> Remember, one cannot compare pure asphalt-breed racecars with silly
> power-to-weight ratios to 60's and 70's rallycars. If it felt like GPL, it
> wouldn't be right because it isn't GPL.
> If you got to drive a real old F1 and a real old rallycar, you'd have much
> easier life behind the rallycar's wheel :)
> We definitely won't make the physics overcritical for GPL fans, as we want
> it to suit everyone. From my experience with FWD and RWD cars (not F1's,
> mind you ;), RT feels pretty real. It's still really easy to find your car
> from an entirely different spot than you aimed at if you're not careful with
> the throttle.
Ok, but can you answer one thing then, the press copy that you guys ship
out, is it in fact locked in "novice" model ?
Or has the driving model moved on a bit from the build .52 we got
perhaps ?
Because being one of the persons who did the Preview for "The Pits", I
still think the physics are a bit simplified, not arcadeish or anything
like that, but it most certainly flatters the driver, if not, I'm going
to apply for a position as driver with the ProDrive Subaru Team :-),
Richard Burns, move over, there's another Norwegian coming :-)
Don't get me wrong, I most certainly like it, and will buy it and I
happen to believe it has tons of potential and will more than likely be
the best Rally Sim released to date, but my previous road car was
something akin to the Escort Mk1 in the preview, namely an Opel Manta
with about the same HP, which we used both for track days and "forest
stages", all unofficial of course :-), and there's no way I could have
driven that car in the same way I could drive the Escort
All FORD fans shut up, the Escort might be a better Rally car than my
Manta was, but it was good enough for comparison at least :-)
Yeah, and Mark Blundell liked CPR :-)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com