rec.autos.simulators

N2....3dfx vs rendition

UNC879wi

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by UNC879wi » Thu, 19 Mar 1998 04:00:00

Ok, judgement day.  Everyone that has both 3dfx "and" rendition cards....lets
here the comparisons.   I have a 8mb Thriller PCI card.  Should I be getting a
3dfx card now or stick with the rendition V2200?

Thanks,

Andrew

PHendrix

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by PHendrix » Thu, 19 Mar 1998 04:00:00

Since the 3DFX patch is only a "beta" at the moment, I'd say its too soon to
make comparisons

Ken

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Ken » Thu, 19 Mar 1998 04:00:00

The N23dfx patch is only a beta,  but I have the Thriller 3d and CL Voodoo 2 to
compare it with.  Rendition wins hands down, so far. I'd post screenshots but
hypersnap doesn't want to take Rendition screenshots and I don't know of any other
utilities that will...oh well.
                                                          Ken

The Game Pad
http://gamepad.org/


> Ok, judgement day.  Everyone that has both 3dfx "and" rendition cards....lets
> here the comparisons.   I have a 8mb Thriller PCI card.  Should I be getting a
> 3dfx card now or stick with the rendition V2200?

> Thanks,

> Andrew

Nosfera

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Nosfera » Thu, 19 Mar 1998 04:00:00


>I've got a P166 equipped with a Diamond Monster 3D and a CL 3DBlaster PCI
>Rendition, and the Rendition version beats the 3DFX version on ALL fronts.
>The graphics are much more beautiful, the game plays much more fluidly and
>the framerate is way higher on the Rendition.

It must be a *** by Sierra to try and gain market share for the
Rendition chipset. :-)

--
Nos
send all flames to:

http://www.racesimcentral.net/~nosfer/index.html
ICQ:#8844008                

Stev

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Stev » Thu, 19 Mar 1998 04:00:00

Of course Rendition is going to be a bit better (I would think) cause N2 was
made for Rendition in the first place.

SS



>>I've got a P166 equipped with a Diamond Monster 3D and a CL 3DBlaster PCI
>>Rendition, and the Rendition version beats the 3DFX version on ALL fronts.
>>The graphics are much more beautiful, the game plays much more fluidly and
>>the framerate is way higher on the Rendition.

>It must be a *** by Sierra to try and gain market share for the
>Rendition chipset. :-)

>--
>Nos
>send all flames to:

>http://www.racesimcentral.net/~nosfer/index.html
>ICQ:#8844008

Greg Cisk

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Greg Cisk » Thu, 19 Mar 1998 04:00:00



>>I've got a P166 equipped with a Diamond Monster 3D and a CL 3DBlaster PCI
>>Rendition, and the Rendition version beats the 3DFX version on ALL fronts.
>>The graphics are much more beautiful, the game plays much more fluidly and
>>the framerate is way higher on the Rendition.

>It must be a *** by Sierra to try and gain market share for the
>Rendition chipset. :-)

This is about the only thing that would make sense.

--
Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.


Eric T. Busc

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Eric T. Busc » Thu, 19 Mar 1998 04:00:00

Sierra's latest Interaction magazine has an article on 3D accelerators
where 3Dfx, Riva, Rendition, and ATI all are discussed.  In fact the
section on the Rendition cards is the smallest, and ATI is even given
it's own little side-bar article.  I've said it numerous times before...
Sierra is by no means focused solely on Rendition.

--
Eric T. Busch


>>It must be a *** by Sierra to try and gain market share for the
>>Rendition chipset. :-)

>This is about the only thing that would make sense.

Honey..

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Honey.. » Fri, 20 Mar 1998 04:00:00

Sorry, but how do you run it from Dos 6.22?
Booting in Dos 6.22 and with the two Glide files copied to the Nascar 2 directory,  it doesn't start
for me with a Monster 3d.
Ideas? Thanks.

Greg Cisk

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Greg Cisk » Fri, 20 Mar 1998 04:00:00

There are more than just 2 files that must be copied. I believe you need
the batch and executable files. And you can put the SET variables
to change fog & anti-alaising in those bat files instead of your
Autoexec.bat.

See I can be helpful :-)

--
Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.



>Sorry, but how do you run it from Dos 6.22?
>Booting in Dos 6.22 and with the two Glide files copied to the Nascar 2

directory,  it doesn't start
Rich Edg

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Rich Edg » Fri, 20 Mar 1998 04:00:00


>Ken,
>which version of HyperSnap did you try, that did not work with Rendition
>card? Current one is HyperSnap-DX ver. 3.10, could you load it from my
>web site (if you have an older version), enable "DirectX and Glide Capture"
>on Capture menu, then start the game and use ScrollLock key for captures,
>then tell me if that worked or not?

For some reason, I cant take screenshots at all, with Hypersnap or
anything else. the PrintScreen, keypad * dont do anything, when I load
hypersnap DX and press scrollLock, n2 locks the system.....

I was gunna blame it on win98 beta 3, but i get the same results in
DOS mode ( minus the hypersnap obviously) Anybody got any ideas? Im
running a monster 3d 4mb card.

Nosfera

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Nosfera » Fri, 20 Mar 1998 04:00:00


>Sorry, but how do you run it from Dos 6.22?
>Booting in Dos 6.22 and with the two Glide files copied to the Nascar 2 directory,  it doesn't start
>for me with a Monster 3d.
>Ideas? Thanks.

I have the same card and I never put the dll's in the N2 directory. I
put the glide2x.ovl file in there and it ran fine using my own bat
file to run it. Here's a copy of the bat file I use to run N2. You
also need to add this line to your config.sys so that you don't run
out of environment space. shell=c:\dos\command.com /p /e:1024

g:
cd\nascar2
SET N2FXAA=0
SET N2FXFOG=0.10
SET N2FXFOGCOLOR=0xa8a8a8
SET N2FXLOAD=0x100000
SET SST_FASTMEM=1
SET SST_FASTPCIRD=1
SET FX_GLIDE_SWAPINTERVAL=0
SET SST_SCREENREFRESH=75
SET SST_RGAMMA=1.10
SET SST_GGAMMA=1.10
SET SST_BGAMMA=1.10
SET SST_GRXCLK=57
NAS3DFX.EXE -3DFX

--
Nos
send all flames to:

http://www.cris.com/~nosfer/index.html
ICQ:#8844008                

Robert Forema

N2....3dfx vs rendition

by Robert Forema » Fri, 20 Mar 1998 04:00:00

Eric, don't pay any mind to all the DUMB ASSES who think Sierra has it
out for 3DFX these people have nothing better to do. Just keep putting
out a great product and make us proud with NASCAR 3. I CAN'T WAIT.


> Sierra's latest Interaction magazine has an article on 3D accelerators
> where 3Dfx, Riva, Rendition, and ATI all are discussed.  In fact the
> section on the Rendition cards is the smallest, and ATI is even given
> it's own little side-bar article.  I've said it numerous times before...
> Sierra is by no means focused solely on Rendition.

> --
> Eric T. Busch


> >>It must be a *** by Sierra to try and gain market share for the
> >>Rendition chipset. :-)

> >This is about the only thing that would make sense.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.