>>Hmm, so by implication drivers like John, Randy & myself are obviously
>>just incompetent then? <g>
>You said it not me :-)
No, you said it, just in an underhanded manner. Richard just wanted
to get you on the record as calling both he and Richard (and myself
for that matter) incompetent drivers. You can wiggle on the hook if
you like, but that's what you've implied pretty clearly. There are a
lot of sim racers that know these guys from fierce F1SA hotlap charts
who are laughing at YOUR ignorance if you want to cut these two guys
down.
--
F1RS, the ONLY choice??? Gee, you really are a devoted little puppy
aren't you. Only ONE 3D board, only ONE racing sim. I guess there's
"the one" and then there's crap, right?
Is *this* the best you could come up with? Well, Greg. Lets see.
Jacques Villeneuve used GP2 to prepare for his first trip to Spa and
won pole, whereas he could only qualify 18th in the game. Jordan
drivers actually were using the Psygnosis model of Jerez to prepare
their drivers for it, and spent a great deal of time helping Psygnosis
tweak THEIR driving model, and that's for the Playstation. Then you
have guys like Mark Blundell and Mauricio Gugelmin (who won CART races
last year) testifying for the CPR physics model, oh and a bunch of
guys from the Indy Racing League provided a great deal of feedback on
the IRL sim. We obviously all have different opinions about those
games REGARDLESS of what big names spent time critiquing them, so why
should F1RS be any different? Oh yes. I forgot. It's "THE ONE".
Well, if you're that easy, then there's a lot of other games out there
that you should look into, because almost every one has had driver
input into the driving model.
Wow. Leaving room for two opinions? This is a big step forward for
you, Greg!
Try it in GP2 and ensure that your occupancy is <=100% in the process
and tell me you don't think GP2 feels faster.
There's a first for everything.
Randy
Randy Magruder
Contributing Reviewer
Digital Sportspage
http://www.digitalsports.com