rec.autos.simulators

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

Remco Moe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by Remco Moe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


> an unfinished piece of shit

Hmmmm....I wonder what that is?

Remco

John Walla

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by John Walla » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00

On Wed, 19 Aug 1998 23:50:29 +1000, Bruce Kennewell


>The reader/listener "infers", John.  The writer/speaker "implies".:o)

Correct. David was the listener (and "inferrer"), hence infer.

Cheers!
John

Randy Magrud

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by Randy Magrud » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


Wrong.  CART and GPL cars are night and day different.  If CPR drives
more like a GPL car, its because they took off loads of rear
downforce, making the car incredibly loose, even at high speeds.
CPR's driving model can be poor or good compared to Champ cars.  Even
if CPR's model is great assuming you are driving a Legends car, then
its not great, because that's not what the game seeks to model.  Its
true that CPR cars in the advanced physics mode are often ***ly
difficult to drive well, but again, I think that's due to messed up
grip/downforce models and poor control, and NOT a great physics model.
If that difficultly makes driving a more realistic sim easier, then
fine.  Some people would feel the effort in CPR is not worth the
reward though.

Again, challenging does not necessarily carry in realism with it.

That's a reach.  First of all, car geometry and handling can be
simulated mathematically, as can the effects of downforce on braking,
grip, accleration, etc.  We could go through item by item each of the
problems with CPR's physics model, but ultimately what I want you to
consider is this:  When the game first came out, Microsoft posted
quotes from Mauricio Gugelmin saying the grip model was perfect.  Then
they patched it, removing a ton of downforce.  So, is it STILL
perfect?  And if the patched version is perfect, what was the FIRST
version?

I don't know about that, Dave.  When I went to Skip Barber and got my
first run in a real Formula car, I felt like the sims had helped me
tremendously, in getting a good sense of the driving line, balancing
the throttle in the middle of the corner, and making the right
corrections to recover from oversteer (which I experienced in Turn 4
at Laguna Seca...eek!).  I am pretty sure that without the tons of
hours I spent on sims, I would have spun the car more than once.

Randy
Randy Magruder
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Randy Magrud

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by Randy Magrud » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


>>1.  The lack of an appropriate amount of rear download at high speeds

>That's not true for someone who has given one more day to learning how to
>set up the game.

Nice try, Mark.  I spent a ton of hours setting up the car.  In the
first version, the setups were what I'd call "centered".  I.e. you
could take a neutral setup and go either way with it.  With the
physics model changes in the patch, the garage settings are no longer
centered.  You have to have a heckuva lot more rear wing to even
approach the level of rear download you had in the first version.  The
other setup changes 'moved' similarly off center.  I happen to know
what happened during the time the game was patched, and I can tell you
that the physics model changes were quite drastic and sudden, with
very little 'bake time' before the patch was released.  There was no
time for any of the changes to be verified against real cars, nor for
the garage settings to be re-calibrated to the new physics model.  If
you think you can defeat my arguments with that lame comment above,
you picked the wrong guy.  NO ONE wanted CPR to rule more than I did.

Once again, another weak response written by someone who obviously
knows NOTHING about me.

Once again, a very weak counter.  Let me give you a hint for future
debates.  Try something other than personal shots, unless you are
utterly incapable of debating intelligently.

Randy
Randy Magruder
http://members.home.com/rmagruder

David G Fishe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by David G Fishe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

>David, I really don't give a hoot whether you like it or not.  Neither
>do I care whether you will "kick ass" or "rip me up" (such colourful
>terms!), mainly because I won't be playing it on-line between here and
>the Land of the Canaanites and also because I consider it to be
>"entertainment", not a means of proving my manhood!
>Regards,
>Bruce.
>----------

Exactly, these sims are entertainment. Unlike many otheres here at r.a.s., I
keep my opinions either technical, or to hopefully encourage others to join
in the fun. I don't try to prove my manhood by putting others down, or
stating that a piece of entertainment software that others put a lot of time
into, work on setups for, create tracks for, and enjoy immensely, "sucks" or
is "a piece of shit". You know who makes comments like that, don't you? The
real MEN of R.A.S.

Dave
DmndDave

David G Fishe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by David G Fishe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00



>but ultimately what I want you to
>consider is this:  When the game first came out, Microsoft posted
>quotes from Mauricio Gugelmin saying the grip model was perfect.  Then
>they patched it, removing a ton of downforce.  So, is it STILL
>perfect?  And if the patched version is perfect, what was the FIRST
>version?

If he was using a low wing setting with the first version  a higher wing
setting with the patched version would give similiar grip. Who knows what
setups he was using.

Dave
DmndDave

David G Fishe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by David G Fishe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


>I could go on with more, but there is little point. Every sim has it's
>flaws (heck real life racing has it's flaws so what chance for a
>perfect sim?!), and it all depends whether those flaws are important
>to you, can be overlooked or are even seen as flaws - some may like
>the above aspects. What is being argued is not whether or not CPR is a
>good sim, the argument tends to be whether one person's idea of a good
>sim matches another person's. It should be enough to enjoy it without
>trying to persuade people they are wrong for not enjoying it (and vice
>versa of course). Who am I to tell someone else what they enjoy?

At least one person understands. The extreme and insulting comments that are
so prevalent here at r.a.s. are useless.

That's the problem. People here at r.a.s. think they know what these cars
should be like, but they don't. Car physics really aren't that difficult to
understand. It's not brain surgery. Driving a car isn't very difficult
either. Everybody, including the incredibly stupid, very young, very old,
the scared, and the clumsy, seems to be able to drive a car. Again, not
brain surgery. It's easy to have an idea of how those cars SHOULD handle,
but they are much different than anything anyone here at r.a.s. has ever
come close to experiencing. It's like a high school QB thinking he knows
what it's like to play pro QB. World's apart.

Dave
DmndDave

Ronald Stoe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by Ronald Stoe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


> Oh, alright, if you insist that we say it.....

> "You suck at driving sims".

> There now....feel better?

Now, come on, don't spell it out!! You'll hurt his feelings... ;^)

l8er
ronny


> > If someone says CPR sucks, then they absolutely are saying I
> > suck at driving sims

--
How to get rid of censorship in German game releases
<http://www.gamesmania.com/german/maniac/freedom/freedom.htm>

          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!

David G Fishe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by David G Fishe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00

My original posting was about your "sucks" comment. It was not soapboxing.
It was a comment on your choice of adjectives. CPR has it's pros and cons.
Like any sim. I have stated both many, many, times.

You, on the other hand, have been praising Papyrus and GPL as if it's your
religion. According to you, NOTHING is wrong with GPL apparently. Based on a
demo.


>> Lots of reasons why CPR is great and anybody who doesn't think so > needs

attending to.

When did I write this combination of lines? I'm curious because it wasn't in
this thread.

Dave
DmndDave


>David, what you are doing is "soapboxing".

David G Fishe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by David G Fishe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


>People who've tried and commented on GPL have driven '67 F1 >cars.

Yes, and maybe the current best driver in the world (Zanardi) commented on
CPR. Along with a few other awesome drivers and they all had very positive
things to say. Maybe they just lied, or should of talked to Bruce first.

Dave
DmndDave

David G Fishe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by David G Fishe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


>Hey Dave, how many words is that today? Do MS pay you by the word or
something? MS
>obviously hope newbies will read your dribble to try to empty those bargain

bins aye?

I wish they'd pay me NOT to read your tired old posturing. I'd like to have
those minutes of my life back. I would of been better off using them to pick
my nose. Same results from both.

Dave
DmndDave

David G Fishe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by David G Fishe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00

It may be what's left on his plate when he's full.

Dave
DmndDave



>> an unfinished piece of shit

>Hmmmm....I wonder what that is?

>Remco

David G Fishe

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by David G Fishe » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


>   BTW, for those that don't know, Dave's a beta tester for MS. This should
help many to
>understand why he's like a captain going down with his ship! CPR is an
unfinished piece of
>shit and an insult to the intelligence of the intelligent! So guess what
this means to
>those of you not feeling insulted by MS over CPR!

My beta testing has absolutely nothing to do with any comments I make. I
happen to like F1RS a lot, though it has flaws, and GPL, which will have
flaws, and MTM2 with it's faults, and I used to race POD, and many others. I
didn't test for the developers of those sims/games.

Dave
DmndDave

Marc J. Nelso

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by Marc J. Nelso » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00

Perhaps they were compensated for their endor***t?

Cheers!

Marc


> Yes, and maybe the current best driver in the world (Zanardi) commented on
> CPR. Along with a few other awesome drivers and they all had very positive
> things to say.

--
Marc J. Nelson
The Sim Project - http://www.racesimcentral.net/

* No animals were harmed in the making of this e-mail *

Tim -fusio

So you think CPR sucks? Read on...

by Tim -fusio » Thu, 20 Aug 1998 04:00:00


I don't care about CPR anymore, but this comment is way out there.
Just because it was a new release doesn't give it a right to be
screwed up more than another game.
It doesn't matter weather a game/engine is in it's first or tenth
revision. You rate them on what they are, not what came before them.

--

 http://www.users.fast.net/~fusion1
 (dirt bikes, rat bikes, rental car abuse...)


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.