rec.autos.simulators

> >Come on, if anyone things that Crammond can beat this there on ***.

> Let's try that again Shaun.  "thinks" and "they're" might help the
> above sentence.  Crack kills.

> Surely this is a troll.

> Surely this is a troll.

> <yawn>

> Is this newsgroup turning into a troll fest of people who think the name of
> this NG is : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.arcade.racing ???

> Shaun, graphics don't mean a GOOD quality title.  Graphics don't create
> intense and immerse gameplay options like GP2 had and GP3 will have.
> Graphics don't create the sensation of really racing a F1 car to it's limit,
> it only increase it a little IF and the IF is important here... IF you have
> a quality game engine that models accurately a F1 car.

> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> -- May the Downforce be with you...

> "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."

> DjFIL

> > > Come on, if anyone things that Crammond can beat this there on ***.

> > <yawn>

> > Is this newsgroup turning into a troll fest of people who think the name of
> > this NG is : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.arcade.racing ???

> > Shaun, graphics don't mean a GOOD quality title.  Graphics don't create
> > intense and immerse gameplay options like GP2 had and GP3 will have.
> > Graphics don't create the sensation of really racing a F1 car to it's limit,
> > it only increase it a little IF and the IF is important here... IF you have
> > a quality game engine that models accurately a F1 car.

> > --
> > -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> > -- May the Downforce be with you...

> > "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
> > how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."

> A company won't go out and buy some expensive rights, like F1, and than
waste it on
> an arcadish game.  (note: OF1R doesn't count, it was a total flop in my
opinion.).

> hope that clear's up future questions.
> DjFIL

> > Actualy.. some times graphics does mean alot.  Lots of people out there
do
> > little research on games and since they only got the box to look at, and
the
> > game info (as provided by the makers) games can easily sell casuse of
graphics.
> > And I've never seen an arcade game with tyre temp indicators and driving
aids
> > available.  There are alot of features, told and seen in the pics, that
give it
> > the show that it isn't arcadeish.  You never know what It'll turn out to
be in
> > the end, but of what I've seen and heard, it doesn't seam Arcade to me.
This
> > could possiably be released like SBK was, with Action (arcade) and
Simulation
> > options.  And if that happened I'd pick it up with little fuss.  Someone
doesn't
> > just go for a game with expensive rights (FIA) and put out an arcade
game.  I've
> > never heard of it.

> > DjFIL

> > > > Come on, if anyone things that Crammond can beat this there on
***.

> > > <yawn>

> > > Is this newsgroup turning into a troll fest of people who think the
name of
> > > this NG is : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.arcade.racing ???

> > > Shaun, graphics don't mean a GOOD quality title.  Graphics don't
create
> > > intense and immerse gameplay options like GP2 had and GP3 will have.
> > > Graphics don't create the sensation of really racing a F1 car to it's
limit,
> > > it only increase it a little IF and the IF is important here... IF you
have
> > > a quality game engine that models accurately a F1 car.

> > > --
> > > -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> > > -- May the Downforce be with you...

> > > "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't
realise
> > > how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."

> > A company won't go out and buy some expensive rights, like F1, and than
> waste it on
> > an arcadish game.  (note: OF1R doesn't count, it was a total flop in my
> opinion.).

> > hope that clear's up future questions.
> > DjFIL

> > > Actualy.. some times graphics does mean alot.  Lots of people out there
> do
> > > little research on games and since they only got the box to look at, and
> the
> > > game info (as provided by the makers) games can easily sell casuse of
> graphics.
> > > And I've never seen an arcade game with tyre temp indicators and driving
> aids
> > > available.  There are alot of features, told and seen in the pics, that
> give it
> > > the show that it isn't arcadeish.  You never know what It'll turn out to
> be in
> > > the end, but of what I've seen and heard, it doesn't seam Arcade to me.
> This
> > > could possiably be released like SBK was, with Action (arcade) and
> Simulation
> > > options.  And if that happened I'd pick it up with little fuss.  Someone
> doesn't
> > > just go for a game with expensive rights (FIA) and put out an arcade
> game.  I've
> > > never heard of it.

> > > DjFIL

> > > > > Come on, if anyone things that Crammond can beat this there on
> ***.

> > > > <yawn>

> > > > Is this newsgroup turning into a troll fest of people who think the
> name of
> > > > this NG is : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.arcade.racing ???

> > > > Shaun, graphics don't mean a GOOD quality title.  Graphics don't
> create
> > > > intense and immerse gameplay options like GP2 had and GP3 will have.
> > > > Graphics don't create the sensation of really racing a F1 car to it's
> limit,
> > > > it only increase it a little IF and the IF is important here... IF you
> have
> > > > a quality game engine that models accurately a F1 car.

> > > > --
> > > > -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> > > > -- May the Downforce be with you...

> > > > "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't
> realise
> > > > how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."

> If were gonna use Nascar Revolution against EA F1, why not use SOS aginst
> Microprose's GP3?  Thing is we can't do that.  EA is a huge crew, not just
1 guy
> programing every single game.  Same with Microprose, Crammond didn't make
SOS,
> so why use that aginst him?  You see where this is going.

> DjFIL

> > Two words "Nascar Revolution"........................