rec.autos.simulators

> >Come on, if anyone things that Crammond can beat this there on ***.

> Let's try that again Shaun.  "thinks" and "they're" might help the
> above sentence.  Crack kills.

> Surely this is a troll.

> Cheers,

> Shumi

> > Come on, if anyone things that Crammond can beat this there on ***.
> > The graphics shot GP3 to shit, and if the physics are as good or better
> > than CPR I'm sold. GP3; all cars use the same model; what the hell is a
> > virtual***pit? if that's CPR's its crap.
> > EA F1 2000; look at the screen shots (car models); -appear- to be a GPL
> > equivalent 3D***pit.
> > Initially i was considering buying GP3 just for the 'current' wait wait,
> > its old...
> > I'm an antiEAist, i hate revoltion, SBK was ***(well semicrap, it
> > wasn't really made by EA though), and NforS is nothing, SCGT is mega-

> <yawn>

> Is this newsgroup turning into a troll fest of people who think the name
of
> this NG is : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.arcade.racing ???

> Shaun, graphics don't mean a GOOD quality title.  Graphics don't create
> intense and immerse gameplay options like GP2 had and GP3 will have.
> Graphics don't create the sensation of really racing a F1 car to it's
limit,
> it only increase it a little IF and the IF is important here... IF you
have
> a quality game engine that models accurately a F1 car.

> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> -- May the Downforce be with you...

> "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."