rec.autos.simulators

GPL graphics cards

Huw Morr

GPL graphics cards

by Huw Morr » Tue, 05 Jun 2001 18:42:04

I've just bought GPL, and I need some advice about graphics cards.

Currently, I have a 450 AMD with 64 megs and I'm running it in software mode.
In the***pit view, I'm getting about 8fps, and in the chase view 11fps.
Obviously, I'm going to have to bite the bullet and get a graphics card[1]. So
the question is, what should I get?

I need to check here because the game is now three years old, and the graphics
card scene has moved on a bit in that time! The game supports Rendition and 3dfx,
but I notice there is a patch for D3D (whatever that is..)

I don't want to spend a huge amount of money. 100 or so. Less if possible.
Something that is supported by GP3 as well. I'm not looking to end up with a
state-of-the-art megacard. Just something that will give me 20-30 fps at
800x600 or better. Suggestions?

Bear in mind I know very little about graphics cards. I assume these days they
are all 2D/3D combined, so I can throw away my current 2D card? I've heard
good things about the TNT2 - does that work will with GPL and GP3?

Thanks in advance.

Huw

[1] Hey it's an old machine, and Age of Empires and Rollercoaster Tycoon don't
need a 3D card, OK? :-)

Ric Dange

GPL graphics cards

by Ric Dange » Tue, 05 Jun 2001 19:25:28

The thing with GPL is that it needs 3DFX. This is a proprietary format that
is not the same as Direct3D (another proprietary format - this time from
Microsnot).

Basically you'll need to get hold of a card that supports 3dfx. You'll see
from the documentation that came with GPL that there's a very limited set of
cards. At it's most basic you'll need a Voodoo2 card. I think. I have a
Voodoo 3500 TV and it's oarsome.

Be aware, most salesman at computer shops will say "yes this is 3dfx
compatible" but unless you see the 3dfx compatible logo on the side don't
buy it.

In the meantime, you may want to look into 3dfx emulators which are said to
be able to pretend to be a 3dfx card (Glide I think is the term). They
were'nt available for my Matrox G400 so now I've got two cards!

Ric


Ian Riche

GPL graphics cards

by Ian Riche » Tue, 05 Jun 2001 19:27:22


Huw,

A few points:

1) What graphics card do you have at present?  It may well offer you some
improvement when used in conjunction with the D3D patch you mention

2) The D3D patch allows GPL to make use of the 3D accelerated functions on
cards that support the D3D API.

<simplified mode>

There are a  number of different "languages" that programs can use to "talk"
to 3D cards - and most graphics cards understand at least one of these.  The
most used include D3D, OpenGL and Glide (3dfx)

Out-of-the-box, GPL only "talks" Glide and Rendition.  That means that only
a card with 3dfx or rendition chips on it will "understand" the 3d graphics.

The most popular two graphics "languages" are now OpenGl and D3D.  The
unsupported OpenGL and D3D patches released for GPL allow it to speak these
"languages", thus allowing accelerated 3D graphics on most graphics cards.

Because Glide and the Rendition language were closely linked with particular
hardware - they generally offered better performance (fps) on the same
hardware than the same game running under D3D or Glide, which brings us on
to 3)

3) An AMD K6-450 is not exactly cutting edge - and GPL can be very
demanding.  You will probably be best trying to find a card based on a 3dfx
chipset (a Voodoo card), as this will help maximise framerate.

If you want to keep your current card, try and find a "Voodoo 2" card.  This
is a standalone 3D card that fits in a full length PCI slot and works in
conjunction with your current card.  You'll only be able to get them
second-hand, and it should cost you somewhere around 25.

You could also replace your current card with a Voodoo 3, 4 or 5.  These
offer increasing performance and resolution, with the voodoo5 in particular
offering excellent image quality thanks to its Full-Screen-Anti-Aliasing
features (FSAA) that smooth out the "jaggy" lines where one colour meets
another on the computer screen.  These cards all come in PCI or AGP formats.
Again , due to the demsise of 3dfx, you'll probably have to look for these
second-hand.

4) All the above advice in 3) is relevant only for GPL.  3dfx cards are now
a technology dead-end, and will get no more support.  There are already
games being released that do not - and will not - run on Voodoo 2 and Voodoo
3 cards.  However - your AMD 450 is not exactly cutting edge either - and
spending a lot of money on a graphics card for this machine is not
particularly sensible - IMHO.  Another downside of the Voodoo 2/3 cards is
that they will not run some of the latest community-developed add-on tracks
as well as other cards - but again - your processor will probably be as much
of a limit here.

5) If you do want a new graphics card that you can later transfer to a more
powerful machine, for your budget consider the GeForce2 MX range of cards.
These will work with the D3D patch on GPL, but will not offer as good a
framerate as a Voodoo card.
You'll be able to buy these new for less than 100.

Hope this helps......

Ian

rik anthra

GPL graphics cards

by rik anthra » Tue, 05 Jun 2001 21:11:19

you need a voodoo3 2000, i have a p2 400 and i get 36fps

Simon Brow

GPL graphics cards

by Simon Brow » Tue, 05 Jun 2001 22:56:54

Er...GPL runs in Direct3D and OpenGL and with Rendition cards as well.


Simon Brow

GPL graphics cards

by Simon Brow » Tue, 05 Jun 2001 23:07:21

For the best results with your CPU I would get a V3 3000 AGP or V3 3500 AGP,
or maybe a V4 or V5 if you can afford one.

There is a D3D patch for GPL on Papyrus website, which makes GPL work with
cards like nVidia GeForce / GeForce 2 / GeForce 3, and ATI Radeon cards, but
the D3D patch is a little slower than running GPL on a Voodoo (3dfx) card,
and with your CPU being a little out-of-date you may well need that extra
speed.  If you had a P3-1000, a P4 or an Athlon-1000, or something of that
speed, and you were running with the D3D patch, then the performance of the
D3D patch wouldn't matter, because GPL would easily max-out at 36 fps, even
with a full field.  In that case it would be fine to buy something like a
GF2 GTS/Pro or a Radeon, but since your CPU is only 450 MHz, I think a
Voodoo card would be better for GPL.


John Zumste

GPL graphics cards

by John Zumste » Tue, 05 Jun 2001 23:44:51

Well....
I recently went from a Voodoo 3000 AGP to an Asus nVidia card (on a P2
450mhz) and found no measurable decrease in frame rates. The other
factor to consider: 3dfx is a dead technology essentially, while nVidia
continues to gain strength. You'll be lucky to get another driver
upgrade for any 3dfx card, especially given that nVidia purchased most
of the assets of 3dfx. Why buy yourself into a dead-end? If you can buy
an nVidia card for PCI, I'd say that's your best bet.

> For the best results with your CPU I would get a V3 3000 AGP or V3 3500 AGP,
> or maybe a V4 or V5 if you can afford one.

> There is a D3D patch for GPL on Papyrus website, which makes GPL work with
> cards like nVidia GeForce / GeForce 2 / GeForce 3, and ATI Radeon cards, but
> the D3D patch is a little slower than running GPL on a Voodoo (3dfx) card,
> and with your CPU being a little out-of-date you may well need that extra
> speed.  If you had a P3-1000, a P4 or an Athlon-1000, or something of that
> speed, and you were running with the D3D patch, then the performance of the
> D3D patch wouldn't matter, because GPL would easily max-out at 36 fps, even
> with a full field.  In that case it would be fine to buy something like a
> GF2 GTS/Pro or a Radeon, but since your CPU is only 450 MHz, I think a
> Voodoo card would be better for GPL.



> > I've just bought GPL, and I need some advice about graphics cards.

> > Currently, I have a 450 AMD with 64 megs and I'm running it in software
> mode.
> > In the***pit view, I'm getting about 8fps, and in the chase view 11fps.
> > Obviously, I'm going to have to bite the bullet and get a graphics
> card[1]. So
> > the question is, what should I get?

> > I need to check here because the game is now three years old, and the
> graphics
> > card scene has moved on a bit in that time! The game supports Rendition
> and 3dfx,
> > but I notice there is a patch for D3D (whatever that is..)

> > I don't want to spend a huge amount of money. 100 or so. Less if
> possible.
> > Something that is supported by GP3 as well. I'm not looking to end up with
> a
> > state-of-the-art megacard. Just something that will give me 20-30 fps at
> > 800x600 or better. Suggestions?

> > Bear in mind I know very little about graphics cards. I assume these days
> they
> > are all 2D/3D combined, so I can throw away my current 2D card? I've heard
> > good things about the TNT2 - does that work will with GPL and GP3?

> > Thanks in advance.

> > Huw

> > [1] Hey it's an old machine, and Age of Empires and Rollercoaster Tycoon
> don't
> > need a 3D card, OK? :-)

Ian Riche

GPL graphics cards

by Ian Riche » Tue, 05 Jun 2001 23:50:14


<stuff snipped>

The original poster has an AMD 450 - which has considerably less FPU power
than a P2 450 - more akin to a P2 300 to 250.

I can testify that my K6-III 400 ran GPL *much* better on a Voodoo2 under
Glide than a TNT2 with the D3D patch - especially in the***pit view at
race starts.

Ian

Huw Morr

GPL graphics cards

by Huw Morr » Wed, 06 Jun 2001 00:40:02


> 3) An AMD K6-450 is not exactly cutting edge - and GPL can be very
> demanding.  You will probably be best trying to find a card based on a 3dfx
> chipset (a Voodoo card), as this will help maximise framerate.

> If you want to keep your current card, try and find a "Voodoo 2" card.  This
> is a standalone 3D card that fits in a full length PCI slot and works in
> conjunction with your current card.  You'll only be able to get them
> second-hand, and it should cost you somewhere around 25.

> You could also replace your current card with a Voodoo 3, 4 or 5.

Thanks for the help. I've ordered a Voodoo 3 3000 from Watford Electronics.

Incidently, does anybody have any recomendations for online computer hardware
stuff in the UK other than Watford? (Nothing against WE, I've always found them
reliable.)

Huw

Laurence Wilme

GPL graphics cards

by Laurence Wilme » Wed, 06 Jun 2001 02:16:44



<snip>

Without hesitation, first choice is DABS http://www.dabs.com/
mainly because their MD is regularly present on uk.comp.vendors
answering questions/comments etc.

--
Laurence Wilmer

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.256 / Virus Database: 129 - Release Date: 31/05/01

Simon Brow

GPL graphics cards

by Simon Brow » Wed, 06 Jun 2001 03:05:22

Just trying to give impartial advice.  I upgraded from a V3 3000 AGP to a
GF2 GTS (32MB) and GPL performance went down (p3-650).

You say "no measurable decrease in frame rates", I presume you mean the game
was still running 36 fps most of the time.  This is not a valid test of
performance.  To see if GPL runs faster on a Voodoo card you'd have to run
GPL under demanding conditions, like full-grid (19 opponents) race starts
with the detail slider bar on full form***pit view.  Under these
conditions I used to get 27 fps on my V3, I now get 24 fps on the GF2.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the GF2, it's a fantastic card.
It's the card I run GPL with, and I'm delighted with it overall.  It's just
that the D3D renderer for GPL didn't get the testing and optimizing that the
Glide renderer had, afterall the D3D renderer was written in Grant Reeve's
spare time.

It's true the V3/V5 are dead-end cards, but so is a TNT2, GeForce 1 or GF2
MX because of it's performance.  If you were looking for a quick fix to give
a real improvement to GPL (vs software renderer) for very little money, I
still say a V3 is unbeatable.


David Butte

GPL graphics cards

by David Butte » Wed, 06 Jun 2001 05:50:04


<snip>

[miles OT] My BBC Model B+ has a Watford 1770 dual floppy drive from
Watford. Fif*** years old, weighs about as much as a BRM and has
never, EVER broken down. That's why I still buy stuff from WE.

[less OT] and of course the BBC Micro is where it all began - Revs!

--
David. (GPLRank handicap -5.92; Monsters of GPLRank h/cap +272.44)
The GPL Scrapyard: http://www.racesimcentral.net/
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really" - Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh.

ed

GPL graphics cards

by ed » Wed, 06 Jun 2001 07:11:05

Huw Morris

I think you're good to go with the V3, given your specs.
But I would suggest this if your motherboard supports it:
Replacing your K6-2 with a K6-2+ chip, that features 128kb of on chip cache.

substantial performance increase in GPL with a Voodoo3 2000.

The K6-2 450 (which will clock to 550 without trouble) can be had in the
states for 35.00 from tigerdirect.com.  If you can get one cheaply it's well
worth it.


> Just trying to give impartial advice.  I upgraded from a V3 3000 AGP to a
> GF2 GTS (32MB) and GPL performance went down (p3-650).

> You say "no measurable decrease in frame rates", I presume you mean the
game
> was still running 36 fps most of the time.  This is not a valid test of
> performance.  To see if GPL runs faster on a Voodoo card you'd have to run
> GPL under demanding conditions, like full-grid (19 opponents) race starts
> with the detail slider bar on full form***pit view.  Under these
> conditions I used to get 27 fps on my V3, I now get 24 fps on the GF2.

> I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the GF2, it's a fantastic card.
> It's the card I run GPL with, and I'm delighted with it overall.  It's
just
> that the D3D renderer for GPL didn't get the testing and optimizing that
the
> Glide renderer had, afterall the D3D renderer was written in Grant Reeve's
> spare time.

> It's true the V3/V5 are dead-end cards, but so is a TNT2, GeForce 1 or GF2
> MX because of it's performance.  If you were looking for a quick fix to
give
> a real improvement to GPL (vs software renderer) for very little money, I
> still say a V3 is unbeatable.



> > Well....
> > I recently went from a Voodoo 3000 AGP to an Asus nVidia card (on a P2
> > 450mhz) and found no measurable decrease in frame rates. The other
> > factor to consider: 3dfx is a dead technology essentially, while nVidia
> > continues to gain strength. You'll be lucky to get another driver
> > upgrade for any 3dfx card, especially given that nVidia purchased most
> > of the assets of 3dfx. Why buy yourself into a dead-end? If you can buy
> > an nVidia card for PCI, I'd say that's your best bet.

Don Burnett

GPL graphics cards

by Don Burnett » Wed, 06 Jun 2001 08:03:00

The D3D patch from Papy is great, and a 3dfx or rendition card is no longer
a necessaty to get decent graphics in GPL.
I run GPL with a GeForce2 MX card - Hercules Prophet - and it looks
fantastic. I would not hesitate to recommend the MX card.

Don Burnette


> The thing with GPL is that it needs 3DFX. This is a proprietary format
that
> is not the same as Direct3D (another proprietary format - this time from
> Microsnot).

> Basically you'll need to get hold of a card that supports 3dfx. You'll see
> from the documentation that came with GPL that there's a very limited set
of
> cards. At it's most basic you'll need a Voodoo2 card. I think. I have a
> Voodoo 3500 TV and it's oarsome.

> Be aware, most salesman at computer shops will say "yes this is 3dfx
> compatible" but unless you see the 3dfx compatible logo on the side don't
> buy it.

> In the meantime, you may want to look into 3dfx emulators which are said
to
> be able to pretend to be a 3dfx card (Glide I think is the term). They
> were'nt available for my Matrox G400 so now I've got two cards!

> Ric



> > I've just bought GPL, and I need some advice about graphics cards.

> > Currently, I have a 450 AMD with 64 megs and I'm running it in software
> mode.
> > In the***pit view, I'm getting about 8fps, and in the chase view
11fps.
> > Obviously, I'm going to have to bite the bullet and get a graphics
> card[1]. So
> > the question is, what should I get?

> > I need to check here because the game is now three years old, and the
> graphics
> > card scene has moved on a bit in that time! The game supports Rendition
> and 3dfx,
> > but I notice there is a patch for D3D (whatever that is..)

> > I don't want to spend a huge amount of money. 100 or so. Less if
> possible.
> > Something that is supported by GP3 as well. I'm not looking to end up
with
> a
> > state-of-the-art megacard. Just something that will give me 20-30 fps at
> > 800x600 or better. Suggestions?

> > Bear in mind I know very little about graphics cards. I assume these
days
> they
> > are all 2D/3D combined, so I can throw away my current 2D card? I've
heard
> > good things about the TNT2 - does that work will with GPL and GP3?

> > Thanks in advance.

> > Huw

> > [1] Hey it's an old machine, and Age of Empires and Rollercoaster Tycoon
> don't
> > need a 3D card, OK? :-)

Gary Stephenso

GPL graphics cards

by Gary Stephenso » Wed, 06 Jun 2001 14:35:24


> Thanks for the help. I've ordered a Voodoo 3 3000 from Watford Electronics.

Good choice. I had a K6-500 with the Voodoo 3 card and it worked quite
nicely with GPL. I still had to turn off some of the graphics to get
good frame rates for races though. That was a CPU shortcoming however.
When I put the Voodoo3 into my 1.3gig Thunderbird machine, I turned
everything ON and got 36fps. Even at the start of a race with a 20 car
grid, it would only drop to 30fps.

Gary


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.