>On Mon, 17 May 1999 10:10:35 -0500,
>>Just remember folks.... In the bigger scheme of things... 5, 10, 15 years
>>down the road the Indy 500 will be 100 years+ old as a race and will still
>>be the greatest spectacle in racing.
>It will never again be the 'greatest spectacle in racing', unless it has
>the greatest drivers and cars in racing.
This is all asinine, and I can't believe you bozos sucked me into this
old, tired "IRL vs. CART" argument again. Even worse, I can't believe
I let myself get sucked into it. There's NOTHING left to discuss on
this issue. Your argument about the "greatest drivers and cars in
racing" doesn't hold water by ANYBODY's standards. A fan of American
dirt tracks will have a different opinion of who the best drivers are,
just as an F1 race fan's opinion will be equally different. Fans of
NHRA drag racing will have an even different view, for that matter.
There is NO definitive answer to the question of who the "greatest
drivers and cars in racing" are, so it's a moot point to even banter
around such irrelevant cliches. This line of reasoning only takes us
down to the elementary school level, and next thing you know, one of
us will be saying, "Oh yeah, well my driver's better than your
driver." Then, inevitably, the issue of whose father can beat up the
other guy's father comes up, and, frankly, that just doesn't seem like
a worthy course for me to pursue intellectually, so I'm just not going
there.
The Indianapolis 500 has a long and rich history -- those who study
the history of Indy will tell you that virtually EVERY year, there has
been some form of controversy. The rear-drive British invasion was
controversial; the turbine cars were controversial; big wings and
ground effects were controversial at one time; Ray Harroun's decision
to race without a driving mechanic was controversial; baloons and
outhouses have caused controversy (if you don't know about this
reference, you've missed out on a very good story); front-wheel drive
Novis caused controversy; popoff valves were controversial;
equivalency formulas have always been controversial; the Marmon Wasp
itself was controverial (if you don't know what the Marmon Wasp is,
please don't waste my time with a rubuttal to ANY of this); the 100,
150, and 200 mph barriers were controverial; I could go on and on and
on and on, and even then, Donald Davidson could STILL come up with
even MORE controversy surrounding the Indianapolis 500.
The whole CART/IRL issue is just another bit of controversy that will
someday become another footnote in the Indy 500's long and glorious
history, and the Indy 500 WILL go on long after BOTH the IRL and CART
are just the answers to trivia questions known only to diehard lovers
of obscure race trivia.
You can have whatever opinion you want about the IRL and CART --
there's some great racing and some great talent in both series, and
they both have a lot of merit. There are records being set at the
fabled Brickyard this May, though, which tells me that the
Indianapolis 500 is alive and well, thank you very much, so if it
doesn't rain tomorrow, I'll probably be spending some time at the
track watching pointy-nosed cars do what I love to see them do.
The Indy 500 is dead -- long live the Indy 500!
-- JB