That sounds great, but as someone living in the back of beyond and who will
probably never be able to play online I'm rather hoping that some other
non-online tweaks will be in the offing. Like the ability to save the game
in the middle of a GP. There is nothing more annoying than being an hour
into a race and having to leave the game and loose all you have done because
you know the job you have been called out to will probably last all night
and then some...please :)
Matthew
> > I have seen references to some of the things in GPL 1.1, but no
> comprehensive
> > list. Does anyone have one? (email would be great!)
> > I'm particularly interested in the ability to run a dedicated server
> (command
> > line startup, automatic progression to next race) on NT (heard NT
> support
> > would be in there.)
> The GPL 1.1 patch is not out yet, but I'm hoping it won't be long now.
> It will include the ability to launch GPL as either a multiplayer
> client or server with command line parameters. The VROC folks already
> have a version that takes advantage of this, and I believe the GPL
> SpyBoy folks do as well.
> You will be able to run a dedicated GPL server; i.e. a server that
> repeatedly and automatically cycles through a list of races (which you
> specify in a new server.ini file). It is _not_ a daemon in the Un*x
> sense of things. That is, it still brings up the GPL window and
> displays stuff, though it does not use sound or 3D graphics, thus
> reducing CPU load.
> You will also (by connecting with the proper password) be able to
> control a GPL server remotely. You just connect as if you were a
> client, but all the widgets that would normally be grayed out for a
> client are accessible. More than one client can be the "boss" for a
> server, so they'll need to cooperate.
> We have run GPL 1.1 on systems running NT5 Beta 2 without problems. I
> believe we've also run it on NT4 systems with SP3, but don't quote me
> on that. We've also run it on dual-CPU NT systems, and it uses both
> CPU's. Because of GPL's architecture, I don't believe it would use
> more than two, but should run OK if there are more.
> Randy