rec.autos.simulators

GP3 vs F1 2000

Chris Bloo

GP3 vs F1 2000

by Chris Bloo » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Though there are high expectations of F1 2000 I seriously believe it is not
going to live up to the hype for a number of reasons;

1) We have been hearing about GP3 since GP2 came out and we know Geoff
Crammond has  been busy working on it since then.  First we heard about F1
2000 was a couple of months ago, so surely it is going to lack the
development time a Crammond (or papyrus for that matter) sim has.

2) The ridiculous size of the heads in the***pits, such a easy thing to
get right!  If they can't get that simple thing correct then can we
honestly expect realisitic physics?

3) The ability of EA to turn everything into an arcade game.  It looks like
they had a good go with SCGT, but fortunatly they didn't completly destroy
it.

4) So far no F1 sim has really matched GP2 even four years after its
release, even if GP3 is just GP2 with 3d and weather effects I think it
will be worth it.

Chris

James+Kare

GP3 vs F1 2000

by James+Kare » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

I just want to get my hands on it... I don't care how long it takes, I'm
still playing GP2.
DjFI

GP3 vs F1 2000

by DjFI » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

If your gonna pay $40 for 3d and weather effects... and don't forget it
probably won't have internet play either... your crazy.  I'd stay with GP2 if
it was like that.

> Though there are high expectations of F1 2000 I seriously believe it is not
> going to live up to the hype for a number of reasons;

> 1) We have been hearing about GP3 since GP2 came out and we know Geoff
> Crammond has  been busy working on it since then.  First we heard about F1
> 2000 was a couple of months ago, so surely it is going to lack the
> development time a Crammond (or papyrus for that matter) sim has.

> 2) The ridiculous size of the heads in the***pits, such a easy thing to
> get right!  If they can't get that simple thing correct then can we
> honestly expect realisitic physics?

> 3) The ability of EA to turn everything into an arcade game.  It looks like
> they had a good go with SCGT, but fortunatly they didn't completly destroy
> it.

> 4) So far no F1 sim has really matched GP2 even four years after its
> release, even if GP3 is just GP2 with 3d and weather effects I think it
> will be worth it.

> Chris

Pat Dotso

GP3 vs F1 2000

by Pat Dotso » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00


> Though there are high expectations of F1 2000 I seriously believe it is not
> going to live up to the hype for a number of reasons;

Well, I've driven it, and it's a big improvment
over GP2, both in terms of graphics and physics.
I actually haven't seen a lot of hype.  I think
people will be happy with it.

The haven't been working on it for 5 years, but
it is an extension of SCGT, so it has a good
background.

I'm not sure what the final heads will look like,
but I drive in***pit view, so I don't spend a
lot of time looking at them :)

--
Pat Dotson
IMPACT Motorsports
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

GraDe

GP3 vs F1 2000

by GraDe » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Yes it would but it still won't be like that,

for all non-believers, look at this!!!!!
http://www.3dracing.net/f1/pics/gp3/gp2_gp3_compare.jpg

GraDe

GP3 vs F1 2000

by GraDe » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Like I said, look here:
http://www.3dracing.net/f1/pics/gp3/gp2_gp3_compare.jpg

DjFI

GP3 vs F1 2000

by DjFI » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Been there seen that.  Personaly just it's smoothed over.  After 4-5 years of
development I'd expect a whole new engine.  Not these updates.

> > If your gonna pay $40 for 3d and weather effects... and don't forget it
> > probably won't have internet play either... your crazy.  I'd stay with GP2
> if
> > it was like that.

> Like I said, look here:
> http://www.3dracing.net/f1/pics/gp3/gp2_gp3_compare.jpg

Ronald Stoeh

GP3 vs F1 2000

by Ronald Stoeh » Sun, 13 Feb 2000 04:00:00


> Been there seen that.  Personaly just it's smoothed over.  After 4-5 years of
> development I'd expect a whole new engine.  Not these updates.

So, I guess, you didn't buy N2, N99 and N3, right? ;^)

At least, GP3 will have improved physics (well, at least according to
GC's
interview). I would give an arm and a leg (damn, how would I drive?) for
an updated CART2 version (just Glide/D3D and better sound, maybe FF).

--
l8er
ronny

Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?
          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!

GraDe

GP3 vs F1 2000

by GraDe » Sun, 13 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Well as aformer GP2 track editor I must say that you couldn't be further
from the truth.

Firstly, why in teh heel would you want a whole new engine?
GP2 was the pinacle of "Modern" (I said modern so no GPL is better comments)
F1 sims! GP is teh follow up, it is suppsoed to add in all things GP2 didn't
ahve time to squeeze in. A whle new engine would be won right stupid and a
waste of time and effort on GP1 and 2.

Next after ediing lots of tracksand understanding how they work, i ust say
my good man that the Monaco tracks is both retextures AND remoddelled!!!
Oh its all Monaco, it can't change drasticly but its still new, its still
different and to do what they have done on Paul Hoads editors would be one
tough job!!!


> Been there seen that.  Personaly just it's smoothed over.  After 4-5 years
of
> development I'd expect a whole new engine.  Not these updates.


> > > If your gonna pay $40 for 3d and weather effects... and don't forget
it
> > > probably won't have internet play either... your crazy.  I'd stay with
GP2
> > if
> > > it was like that.

> > Like I said, look here:
> > http://www.3dracing.net/f1/pics/gp3/gp2_gp3_compare.jpg

Neo

GP3 vs F1 2000

by Neo » Sun, 13 Feb 2000 04:00:00

On Fri, 11 Feb 2000 12:33:33 -0600, Pat Dotson


>I'm not sure what the final heads will look like,
>but I drive in***pit view, so I don't spend a
>lot of time looking at them :)

Don't you ever watch your own replays to see where you could improve
your lap times, which you can't always see from inside the car?

Neo

Andrew

GP3 vs F1 2000

by Andrew » Sun, 13 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Spell check and punctuation would be nice.


> Well as aformer GP2 track editor I must say that you couldn't be further
> from the truth.

> Firstly, why in teh heel would you want a whole new engine?
> GP2 was the pinacle of "Modern" (I said modern so no GPL is better
comments)
> F1 sims! GP is teh follow up, it is suppsoed to add in all things GP2
didn't
> ahve time to squeeze in. A whle new engine would be won right stupid and a
> waste of time and effort on GP1 and 2.

> Next after ediing lots of tracksand understanding how they work, i ust say
> my good man that the Monaco tracks is both retextures AND remoddelled!!!
> Oh its all Monaco, it can't change drasticly but its still new, its still
> different and to do what they have done on Paul Hoads editors would be one
> tough job!!!


> > Been there seen that.  Personaly just it's smoothed over.  After 4-5
years
> of
> > development I'd expect a whole new engine.  Not these updates.


> > > > If your gonna pay $40 for 3d and weather effects... and don't forget
> it
> > > > probably won't have internet play either... your crazy.  I'd stay
with
> GP2
> > > if
> > > > it was like that.

> > > Like I said, look here:
> > > http://www.3dracing.net/f1/pics/gp3/gp2_gp3_compare.jpg

GraDe

GP3 vs F1 2000

by GraDe » Mon, 14 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Sory bu me cant speel god enuf four yu,
I wil go bery me hed in de sand un sham.


> Spell check and punctuation would be nice.



> > Well as aformer GP2 track editor I must say that you couldn't be further
> > from the truth.

> > Firstly, why in teh heel would you want a whole new engine?
> > GP2 was the pinacle of "Modern" (I said modern so no GPL is better
> comments)
> > F1 sims! GP is teh follow up, it is suppsoed to add in all things GP2
> didn't
> > ahve time to squeeze in. A whle new engine would be won right stupid and
a
> > waste of time and effort on GP1 and 2.

> > Next after ediing lots of tracksand understanding how they work, i ust
say
> > my good man that the Monaco tracks is both retextures AND remoddelled!!!
> > Oh its all Monaco, it can't change drasticly but its still new, its
still
> > different and to do what they have done on Paul Hoads editors would be
one
> > tough job!!!




- Show quoted text -

> > > Been there seen that.  Personaly just it's smoothed over.  After 4-5
> years
> > of
> > > development I'd expect a whole new engine.  Not these updates.


> > > > > If your gonna pay $40 for 3d and weather effects... and don't
forget
> > it
> > > > > probably won't have internet play either... your crazy.  I'd stay
> with
> > GP2
> > > > if
> > > > > it was like that.

> > > > Like I said, look here:
> > > > http://www.3dracing.net/f1/pics/gp3/gp2_gp3_compare.jpg

Andrew

GP3 vs F1 2000

by Andrew » Mon, 14 Feb 2000 04:00:00

It's not necessarily the spelling, but you couldn't make a ***ing point if
your life depended on it.


> Sory bu me cant speel god enuf four yu,
> I wil go bery me hed in de sand un sham.



> > Spell check and punctuation would be nice.



> > > Well as aformer GP2 track editor I must say that you couldn't be
further
> > > from the truth.

> > > Firstly, why in teh heel would you want a whole new engine?
> > > GP2 was the pinacle of "Modern" (I said modern so no GPL is better
> > comments)
> > > F1 sims! GP is teh follow up, it is suppsoed to add in all things GP2
> > didn't
> > > ahve time to squeeze in. A whle new engine would be won right stupid
and
> a
> > > waste of time and effort on GP1 and 2.

> > > Next after ediing lots of tracksand understanding how they work, i ust
> say
> > > my good man that the Monaco tracks is both retextures AND
remoddelled!!!
> > > Oh its all Monaco, it can't change drasticly but its still new, its
> still
> > > different and to do what they have done on Paul Hoads editors would be
> one
> > > tough job!!!



> > > > Been there seen that.  Personaly just it's smoothed over.  After 4-5
> > years
> > > of
> > > > development I'd expect a whole new engine.  Not these updates.


> > > > > > If your gonna pay $40 for 3d and weather effects... and don't
> forget
> > > it
> > > > > > probably won't have internet play either... your crazy.  I'd
stay
> > with
> > > GP2
> > > > > if
> > > > > > it was like that.

> > > > > Like I said, look here:
> > > > > http://www.racesimcentral.net/

David Kar

GP3 vs F1 2000

by David Kar » Mon, 14 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Mom:
"Youboysgitouttathishousen'don'tcomebackinsidetilyoucanbehaveyerseff!!!"


> It's not necessarily the spelling, but you couldn't make a ***ing point
if
> your life depended on it.



> > Sory bu me cant speel god enuf four yu,
> > I wil go bery me hed in de sand un sham.



> > > Spell check and punctuation would be nice.



> > > > Well as aformer GP2 track editor I must say that you couldn't be
> further
> > > > from the truth.

> > > > Firstly, why in teh heel would you want a whole new engine?
> > > > GP2 was the pinacle of "Modern" (I said modern so no GPL is better
> > > comments)
> > > > F1 sims! GP is teh follow up, it is suppsoed to add in all things
GP2
> > > didn't
> > > > ahve time to squeeze in. A whle new engine would be won right stupid
> and
> > a
> > > > waste of time and effort on GP1 and 2.

> > > > Next after ediing lots of tracksand understanding how they work, i
ust
> > say
> > > > my good man that the Monaco tracks is both retextures AND
> remoddelled!!!
> > > > Oh its all Monaco, it can't change drasticly but its still new, its
> > still
> > > > different and to do what they have done on Paul Hoads editors would
be
> > one
> > > > tough job!!!



> > > > > Been there seen that.  Personaly just it's smoothed over.  After
4-5
> > > years
> > > > of
> > > > > development I'd expect a whole new engine.  Not these updates.


> > > > > > > If your gonna pay $40 for 3d and weather effects... and don't
> > forget
> > > > it
> > > > > > > probably won't have internet play either... your crazy.  I'd
> stay
> > > with
> > > > GP2
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > it was like that.

> > > > > > Like I said, look here:
> > > > > > http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Gregor Vebl

GP3 vs F1 2000

by Gregor Vebl » Tue, 15 Feb 2000 04:00:00


> > 2) The ridiculous size of the heads in the***pits, such a easy thing to
> > get right!  If they can't get that simple thing correct then can we
> > honestly expect realisitic physics?

> I'm not sure what the final heads will look like,
> but I drive in***pit view, so I don't spend a
> lot of time looking at them :)

> --
> Pat Dotson
> IMPACT Motorsports
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Judging from your site, that's because ou are always ahead of everyone
else! What about us lowly midfielders ;)?

Gregor Veble


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.