>Has anyone run this combination? If so what were your results? It's a
>rendition based card with the new 2200(?) rendition chip. I have an
>Intergraph Intense 3d that's also rendition based(older chip) and runs
>N2 great, but GP2 performance with the card stinks.
I tried it. First, the Stealth2 is based on the cheaper 2100 version of the
new Rendition chip. Though I don't think you'll see any improvement with one
of the 2200's (ex: Hercules Thriller).
Back to your query: The Stealth2 did fine in SVGA. Same as other cards I have
had in the system (Stealth64 univbe/enabled, Millenium, ET6000-based STB
LS128). Yes, they all give essentially the same performance in SVGA, based
on the in-game "processor occupancy". Don't believe all the hype you hear
about differences in performance in 2D games, at least DOS-based! The Stealth
*might* have given a lower recommended framerate in the video options screen,
but maybe I just misremember. No matter, in the game it was the same as all
those other cards.
However, in VGA (320x200), it is a poor performer. About 20% higher
occupancy readings. This is a known problem with both the earlier V1000 chips
and the new v2x00 chips. If you want to play DOS based games in VGA, this is
not the chip to use. It is much slower in Quake at 320x200 ('course, you can
use VQuake and get better framerate at 640x480!). Surprisingly, it wasn't any
slower in 320x200 ICR2.
Again, in SVGA, it performed pretty much the same as all the other cards I
tried (hey, I like to get first hand experience :-)), in most every SVGA
DOS-based game.