rec.autos.simulators

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

Lake

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Lake » Thu, 28 Jan 1999 04:00:00

Pentium II 700Mhz performance from the AMD K6-2 3D 350... is that possible?
Source is respectable but not reliable... not even very respectable
actually. I have checked PCWorld and they say AMD are offering the
equivalent cheaper.

Would it be significantly faster than a PII 266 with  GPL anyhow?

I did not know where to post this so I attempted to mask my CPU question by
reference to the game I need the upgrade for - fair?

Tony

Arthur Axelra

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Arthur Axelra » Thu, 28 Jan 1999 04:00:00

hahahaha an AMD K6-2 350 doesn't perform as a PII 700, and is even slower
then a PII 350. I would probably say its around a PII 300 speed, so it might
be slightly faster then a PII 266. Wait til the K7, now that might be much
faster then any PII or PIII.

Arthur
Stealth Racing
http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html


>Pentium II 700Mhz performance from the AMD K6-2 3D 350... is that possible?
>Source is respectable but not reliable... not even very respectable
>actually. I have checked PCWorld and they say AMD are offering the
>equivalent cheaper.

>Would it be significantly faster than a PII 266 with  GPL anyhow?

>I did not know where to post this so I attempted to mask my CPU question by
>reference to the game I need the upgrade for - fair?

>Tony

Daxe Rexfor

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Daxe Rexfor » Thu, 28 Jan 1999 04:00:00


Uhh..I like to keep current with hardware, so could you please let me know
where I can buy a PII 700?  Then I can post my opinion on how the
performance compares to an AMD K6-2 350.  Maybe I shouldn't jump at the 700
and i should just go ahead and wait for the PII 900 or PII 1000.  Since the
PII 700 is out already, they can't be far behind.

:-)

daxe

-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
 http://www.newsfeeds.com/       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
-----------== Over 66,000 Groups, Plus  a  Dedicated  Binaries Server ==----------

Phil

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Phil » Fri, 29 Jan 1999 04:00:00

PII 700MHz !!? you gotta be kidding - where did you see that ? The 500MHz
isn't due 'til March.

I'd appreciate a link to where you saw that one...

Ed Medli

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Ed Medli » Fri, 29 Jan 1999 04:00:00

Nope.....not possible. Always remember.......you get what you pay for. If it
sounds too good to be true, it usually isn't true. We are about a year away
from 600mhz performance, 700mhz is farther away than that. Check Tom's
Hardware web site for benchmarks, or some other site that compares
processors. 3D-Now is not supported by many software companies yet, and with
the Intel Katmai coming, many are taking a second look.

Cowen Wilso

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Cowen Wilso » Fri, 29 Jan 1999 04:00:00

Actually there is not PII 700.  The highest the PII goes is 450MHz.  The
PIII will start at 500MHz and go up from there..   PIII was released today..
Thursday the 28th of January.

Cowen Wilson

rob

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by rob » Fri, 29 Jan 1999 04:00:00

Don't worry Daxe _almost_ all of us got your point.

rob.


>Actually there is not PII 700.  The highest the PII goes is 450MHz.  The
>PIII will start at 500MHz and go up from there..   PIII was released
today..
>Thursday the 28th of January.

>Cowen Wilson

Tilu

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Tilu » Sat, 30 Jan 1999 04:00:00

Yea, it isn`t !

 We are about a year away

Well, you CAN buy a C366A today, and run it at 5.5x 100Mhz, or ( whit some
luck, and good cooling ) at 112Mhz, and that thing is CHEAP !
Intel is slowing the bussiness down, so they can keep selling a *little*
faster (and more expensive)  CPU`s from mouth to mouth !
So, 600Mhz isnt far away at all, I was running my system at 504Mhz (2.0V !!,
no extra cooling, no overheating, and it was a P2-300 ! ) for half a year,
now i run my C366A at 616 Mhz (2.2V, and an extra fun inside the case) and
it IS rock stable !

Whit celerons coming over 400Mhz factory settings, and P3`s over 500Mhz, we
are very close to be able to see that kind of perf in most of the serius
simracers PC, and we DO need that power to run GPL 100%, do we ? yea we do
! )

Back to the original question....no way, that AMD K6-2 3D 350 will never get
close to the perf of an Intel celeron of the same clock speed, not for GPL
anyway, maybe if the actual game DO uses 3Dnow! it is possible to gain some
speed, but the lack of 3dnow! support isnt looking good at all !

cya,
Tilus

sorry for the real bad english !

Arthur Axelra

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Arthur Axelra » Sat, 30 Jan 1999 04:00:00

You miss understood me, I never said there were PII 700Mhz CPUs, just that
the AMD 350 doesn't perform as a PII 700 as the post before me stated
"Pentium II 700Mhz performance from the AMD K6-2 3D 350," nothing about PII
700 CPU anywhere, just that the AMD 350 gets PII 700 type performance, which
is just laughable considering the PII 450 crushes the AMD 350.

Arthur
Stealth Racing
http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html




>>hahahaha an AMD K6-2 350 doesn't perform as a PII 700, and is even slower
>>then a PII 350. I would probably say its around a PII 300 speed, so it
>might
>>be slightly faster then a PII 266. Wait til the K7, now that might be much
>>faster then any PII or PIII.

>Uhh..I like to keep current with hardware, so could you please let me know
>where I can buy a PII 700?  Then I can post my opinion on how the
>performance compares to an AMD K6-2 350.  Maybe I shouldn't jump at the 700
>and i should just go ahead and wait for the PII 900 or PII 1000.  Since the
>PII 700 is out already, they can't be far behind.

>:-)

>daxe

>-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/;     The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
>-----------== Over 66,000 Groups, Plus  a  Dedicated  Binaries Server

==----------
Tilu

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Tilu » Sat, 30 Jan 1999 04:00:00

Bad URL Dave !

I don`t care if someone else had to use extra cooling, i know that this
first series of C366A are capoble of reaching 550+, and some 600+, and they
aren`t even mulipleyer locked (!), so you are do not have to use 5.5 multi,
if you wanna go higher/lower you are wellcome ! I bet it is going to change
real soon, but i don`t care until my CPU runs fine !

If you remember i posted the first rewiev of those Celeron 266`s running at
450, and those P2-300 running over 500 to this newsgroup a long, long time
ago, when noone ever know what a SL2W8 is, and no1 belived me eighter !

Thats it, it isnt fake !

Tell me what benchmars you wanna see !

Tilus

sorry for the bad english

Lake

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Lake » Sat, 30 Jan 1999 04:00:00

That's what I meant. Thanks for clearing it up. There is no P II available
from Intel.

Thanks for the feedback - but what's the K7 story. It sounds too perfect.
Tony


>You miss understood me, I never said there were PII 700Mhz CPUs, just that
>the AMD 350 doesn't perform as a PII 700 as the post before me stated
>"Pentium II 700Mhz performance from the AMD K6-2 3D 350," nothing about PII
>700 CPU anywhere, just that the AMD 350 gets PII 700 type performance,
which
>is just laughable considering the PII 450 crushes the AMD 350.

>Arthur
>Stealth Racing
>http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html




>>>hahahaha an AMD K6-2 350 doesn't perform as a PII 700, and is even slower
>>>then a PII 350. I would probably say its around a PII 300 speed, so it
>>might
>>>be slightly faster then a PII 266. Wait til the K7, now that might be
much
>>>faster then any PII or PIII.

>>Uhh..I like to keep current with hardware, so could you please let me know
>>where I can buy a PII 700?  Then I can post my opinion on how the
>>performance compares to an AMD K6-2 350.  Maybe I shouldn't jump at the
700
>>and i should just go ahead and wait for the PII 900 or PII 1000.  Since
the
>>PII 700 is out already, they can't be far behind.

>>:-)

>>daxe

>>-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
==----------
>> http://www.racesimcentral.net/;     The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
>>-----------== Over 66,000 Groups, Plus  a  Dedicated  Binaries Server
>==----------

jalo

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by jalo » Sun, 31 Jan 1999 04:00:00

I've got a C366, it will not run at 550 Mhz, even with 2.3 volts. I have not
checked mine, but I think they are multipiler locked. You must have a
pre-release version.

Richard G Cleg

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Richard G Cleg » Tue, 02 Feb 1999 04:00:00

: I've got a C366, it will not run at 550 Mhz, even with 2.3 volts. I have not
: checked mine, but I think they are multipiler locked. You must have a
: pre-release version.

  They are multiplier locked (as are most celerons) but not clock-speed
locked.  Thus you can, switch from running at 66MHz x5.5 to running at
100Mhz x 5.5.  Of course the chip won't run that hot so it'll be totally
unstable.  (Unlike the C300 which was often stable when switched from 66 to
100 and thus often would run as a C450).  

--
Richard G. Clegg     Only the mind is waving
Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York.

www: http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html

Larr

Pentium II 700Mhz performance

by Larr » Thu, 25 Feb 1999 04:00:00

Like the stories I've read saying the new Celeron 400A runs like a PII
400.  Even Tom's hardware said this.

I bought one, and it SUCKED.  Comparatively, it ran about like a PII
266.

I dusted off the Credit Card and bought a Pentium II 450.  Hell, almost
had to take out a 3rd mortgage!

-Larry


> Nope.....not possible. Always remember.......you get what you pay for. If it
> sounds too good to be true, it usually isn't true.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.