rec.autos.simulators

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

Eric T. Busc

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Eric T. Busc » Mon, 27 May 1996 04:00:00


> What is better? A Pentium 200 or a Pentium PRO 200 for indycar 2 or
> nascar ? I would be greatful if anybody could give me some answers.

If you plan on running Win95, the Pentium Pro will not offer much
of a performance increase over a regular Pentium.  Under WinNT however
it will be significantly faster, perhaps as much as double.  So, unless
you plan on switching to WinNT 4.0 when it is released this fall, it
really makes no sense to spend the extra money to upgrade to the Pro.  

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
Nascar Setups Page: http://www.racesimcentral.net/~ebusch/
Hawaii Network UserName: Buschwick

Arie van Holt

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Arie van Holt » Tue, 28 May 1996 04:00:00

What is better? A Pentium 200 or a Pentium PRO 200 for indycar 2 or
nascar ? I would be greatful if anybody could give me some answers.

Thanks
Joost

Clark Arch

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Clark Arch » Tue, 28 May 1996 04:00:00


 >
 >What is better? A Pentium 200 or a Pentium PRO 200 for indycar 2 or
 >nascar ? I would be greatful if anybody could give me some answers.
 >
 >Thanks
 >Joost
 >

I believe that Rick Genter has pointed out that ICR2 is a 32-bit program, so
you should see about 2x performance when running ICR2.  Don't know about
NCR, but I would imagine it is similar.

Clark

Eric T. Busc

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Eric T. Busc » Tue, 28 May 1996 04:00:00


> I believe that Rick Genter has pointed out that ICR2 is a 32-bit program, so
> you should see about 2x performance when running ICR2.  Don't know about
> NCR, but I would imagine it is similar.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that be true only if you were
running the upcoming Windows versions through WinNT 4.0, a true 32-bit operating
system?  

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/
Hawaii Network UserName: Buschwick

Jo

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Jo » Tue, 28 May 1996 04:00:00



>> I believe that Rick Genter has pointed out that ICR2 is a 32-bit program, so
>> you should see about 2x performance when running ICR2.  Don't know about
>> NCR, but I would imagine it is similar.
>Please correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that be true only if you were
>running the upcoming Windows versions through WinNT 4.0, a true 32-bit operating
>system?  

That depends on which parts of Win95 are 16-bit. I know a lot of the
GDI (Graphics Device Kernal) still is, but that's not used for games.
A game would use the Direct Draw APIs and not much else.

Joe

Clark Arch

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Clark Arch » Tue, 28 May 1996 04:00:00


 >
 >> I believe that Rick Genter has pointed out that ICR2 is a 32-bit program, so
 >> you should see about 2x performance when running ICR2.  Don't know about
 >> NCR, but I would imagine it is similar.
 >
 >Please correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that be true only if you were
 >running the upcoming Windows versions through WinNT 4.0, a true 32-bit
 > operating
 >system?  
 >

Well, I don't think the processor cares what OS is running, just which
instructions are used.  I run ICR2 from a DOS prompt which starts up DOS4GW,
which is as I understand, a 32-bit protected mode OS in and of itself. So as
long as ICR2 is using 32-bit instructions, you will get the full P6
performance.

Check out some of the benchmarks such as Chris' 3D Bench when running on a P6
as compared to a P5 with the same clock speed and graphics adapter.

For example, even though I run NT4.0b1, if I choose to run a 16-bit program,
it will still be slower on a P6 than on a P5 of equal clock speed.

One thing to remember is that when the P5 w/MMX arrives (along with software
to take advantage of the new instructions), that the issue will be further
clouded.

Clark

Adam

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Adam » Tue, 28 May 1996 04:00:00

 Would you mind explaning why that is (only faster in NT 4)? I have never
heard that before. My understanding is that the interger portion of the
ppro is quite a bit faster than it's pentuim brother. You will pay a price
for running 16 bit apps on a ppro but so what.....how many 16 bit apps do
you still have that depend on state of the art performance? Also at least
some of the ppros come with L2 cache on the CPU that runs at CPU speed as
oppsed to external speed.

 The price of the pentium and ppro 200 CPU are pretty close actually. The
motherboards however are not $175 vs. $900. So it's really a price thing.
If I was gonna dump close to 2K on a motherboard I'd wait for Intel to
start putting that MMV on their CPU's, might come in handy for gamers. But
if money is not really an issue I'd go for the ppro. I'm waitng for the
ppro 300 and for the price to drop big time =].

Adam

Eric T. Busc

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Eric T. Busc » Tue, 28 May 1996 04:00:00


> One thing to remember is that when the P5 w/MMX arrives (along with software
> to take advantage of the new instructions), that the issue will be further
> clouded.

Yes, but that will not be occuring in high volume until early 97.  Even so, the MMX
instructions are also being ported over to the P6 CPUs as well.

Right now I don't think the upgrade to a P6 is worth it just to play ICR2 and Nascar,
as the origional poster inquired about.  Unless he was planing on going to switch to
WinNT, which by thw way will not be getting all of DirectX making Win95 the ***
platform of choice (the only reason I haven't switched to WinNT 4.0).  Without taking
full advantage of the chip with the OS as well as applications, the performance just
doesn't justify the cost.

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
Nascar Setups Page: http://www.racesimcentral.net/~ebusch/
Hawaii Network UserName: Buschwick

Jo

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Jo » Tue, 28 May 1996 04:00:00


>> If you plan on running Win95, the Pentium Pro will not offer much
>> of a performance increase over a regular Pentium.  Under WinNT however
>> it will be significantly faster, perhaps as much as double.  So, unless
>> you plan on switching to WinNT 4.0 when it is released this fall, it
>> really makes no sense to spend the extra money to upgrade to the Pro.  

> Would you mind explaning why that is (only faster in NT 4)? I have never
>heard that before. My understanding is that the interger portion of the
>ppro is quite a bit faster than it's pentuim brother. You will pay a price
>for running 16 bit apps on a ppro but so what.....how many 16 bit apps do
>you still have that depend on state of the art performance?

The problem is that so much of Win95 itself (not your apps) is still
16-bit that it does not benefit from the PPro (but this probably
doesn't apply to games, that spend very little time in the Windows
API, and a lot of time executing 32-bit instructions).

Joe

Eric T. Busc

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Eric T. Busc » Tue, 28 May 1996 04:00:00


>  Would you mind explaning why that is (only faster in NT 4)? I have never
> heard that before. My understanding is that the interger portion of the
> ppro is quite a bit faster than it's pentuim brother. You will pay a price
> for running 16 bit apps on a ppro but so what.....how many 16 bit apps do
> you still have that depend on state of the art performance? Also at least
> some of the ppros come with L2 cache on the CPU that runs at CPU speed as
> oppsed to external speed.

Well if you don't know already, Win95 still has 16-bit code.  Its not totally
32-bit, that's why old Win3.1 apps still run on it.  WinNT however, is a true
32-bit operating system with no underlying 16-bit code.  Even some Win95 native
software will not run on NT because of this.

Many computer magazines have run tests showing that a Pentium Pro running Win95 is
only slightly (and I mean very slightly) faster than a regular Pentium.  However
when the OS is switched to NT the speed in some cases doubles.

It's MMX by the way, but you're right.  I really can't justify spending the that
much money on an upgrade knowing full well that within a year it will need to be
replaced.  What I would do (and incidently it's what I'm probably going to do), is
just wait until spring and upgrade to an MMX P6, switch over to WinNT 4.0, and add
a 3D video card.  With the MMX, you basically get 24-bit color at 8-bit speeds as
well as numerous other advantages.  MMX will become the new standard for Windows
games and multimedia.  Come companies (like EPIC with their upcoming title UNREAL)
are already coding for MMX for the added color depth alone.

If someone really can't wait that long, the best option would be to just upgrade
to the P5-200 for now.  Then in the spring upgrade again to the P6.  If you've got
the money to burn, you might as well have the fastest computer avaliable at all
times right? =)

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/
Hawaii Network UserName: Buschwick

RickGent

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by RickGent » Wed, 29 May 1996 04:00:00


writes:

We do no operating system calls during driving in the DOS version, and
very little in the Windows 95 version. For the Windows 95 version,
however, you'll need to make sure that you have the latest DirectDraw
drivers for your video card.

Rick Genter
Technical Lead, IndyCar Racing II
Sierra On-Line, Inc.

Eric T. Busc

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Eric T. Busc » Wed, 29 May 1996 04:00:00


> We do no operating system calls during driving in the DOS version, and
> very little in the Windows 95 version. For the Windows 95 version,
> however, you'll need to make sure that you have the latest DirectDraw
> drivers for your video card.

Although I know you really can't comment on unreleased products, I would
appreciate an answer to one question.  Will the upcoming Windows
versions of Indycar2 and Nascar2 run through WinNT 4.0?  I ask this only
because some Win95 software will not run in the WinNT environment.

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/
Hawaii Network UserName: Buschwick

C Sh

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by C Sh » Wed, 29 May 1996 04:00:00

=> If someone really can't wait that long, the best option would be to just
=>  upgrade
=> to the P5-200 for now.  Then in the spring upgrade again to the P6.  If
=>  you've got
=> the money to burn, you might as well have the fastest computer avaliable at
=>  all
=> times right? =)

No, I will buy either a P5 200 or Cyrix's P200+, then upgrade to Cyrix's M2
next year. This will cost me a lot of Ks

Chris

RickGent

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by RickGent » Wed, 29 May 1996 04:00:00


writes:

Windows NT is not one of the target platforms for IndyCar Racing II.

Rick Genter
Technical Lead, IndyCar Racing II
Sierra On-Line, Inc.

Eric T. Busc

Pentium 200 / Pentium PRO 200 ?

by Eric T. Busc » Thu, 30 May 1996 04:00:00


> Windows NT is not one of the target platforms for IndyCar Racing II.

I realize this Rick, but I would just like to know if the Win95 version will
be able to run under NT.  

You had said earlier that you used few operating system calls in 95 and that you
will need DirectDraw drivers.  WinNT 4.0 will be shipping with DirectDraw and
DirectSound.  Because of this, I had just assumed that the Win95 versions would
indeed run in the NT environment.  

I would really appreciate if you could find this out for me.

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/
Hawaii Network UserName: Buschwick


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.