> Would you mind explaning why that is (only faster in NT 4)? I have never
> heard that before. My understanding is that the interger portion of the
> ppro is quite a bit faster than it's pentuim brother. You will pay a price
> for running 16 bit apps on a ppro but so what.....how many 16 bit apps do
> you still have that depend on state of the art performance? Also at least
> some of the ppros come with L2 cache on the CPU that runs at CPU speed as
> oppsed to external speed.
Well if you don't know already, Win95 still has 16-bit code. Its not totally
32-bit, that's why old Win3.1 apps still run on it. WinNT however, is a true
32-bit operating system with no underlying 16-bit code. Even some Win95 native
software will not run on NT because of this.
Many computer magazines have run tests showing that a Pentium Pro running Win95 is
only slightly (and I mean very slightly) faster than a regular Pentium. However
when the OS is switched to NT the speed in some cases doubles.
It's MMX by the way, but you're right. I really can't justify spending the that
much money on an upgrade knowing full well that within a year it will need to be
replaced. What I would do (and incidently it's what I'm probably going to do), is
just wait until spring and upgrade to an MMX P6, switch over to WinNT 4.0, and add
a 3D video card. With the MMX, you basically get 24-bit color at 8-bit speeds as
well as numerous other advantages. MMX will become the new standard for Windows
games and multimedia. Come companies (like EPIC with their upcoming title UNREAL)
are already coding for MMX for the added color depth alone.
If someone really can't wait that long, the best option would be to just upgrade
to the P5-200 for now. Then in the spring upgrade again to the P6. If you've got
the money to burn, you might as well have the fastest computer avaliable at all
times right? =)
--
Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/
Hawaii Network UserName: Buschwick