rec.autos.simulators

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

David Montan

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by David Montan » Thu, 01 Jul 1999 04:00:00

With the announcement that Nascar 3 will not have the physics engine of GPL,
I've decided to upgrade the motherboard and processor of my current system
now rather than get a new one in seven or eight months.  The hardware FAQ
seemed to indicate that at higher processor speeds a Celeron would give as
good performance as a PII.  Is this your experience as well?  I'm deciding
between a Celeron 466 and a PII 450.
My system will also have:
128 megs RAM
4 meg Diamond Monster II (Voodoo2)

I know either will do a heck of a lot better than my AMDK6-233, but I'd like
the best possible performance for my $.  Opinions please.  Thanks in
advance,
David

Ed Ba

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Ed Ba » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00

On Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:07:57 -0500,


I would buy the Celeron 466, and a Voodoo3-2000.

--
* rrevved at mindspring dot com
* unit.26 - s.p.u.t.u.m.
* http://www.cabal.net
* http://www.sputum.com

Nathan Wo

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Nathan Wo » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00

On Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:07:57 -0500, "David Montani"


>With the announcement that Nascar 3 will not have the physics engine of GPL,
>I've decided to upgrade the motherboard and processor of my current system
>now rather than get a new one in seven or eight months.  The hardware FAQ
>seemed to indicate that at higher processor speeds a Celeron would give as
>good performance as a PII.  Is this your experience as well?  I'm deciding
>between a Celeron 466 and a PII 450.
>My system will also have:
>128 megs RAM
>4 meg Diamond Monster II (Voodoo2)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

take it back and demand the rest of the RAM that belongs on your card!
:)
--
Nathan Wong          http://www.nectar.com.au/~alfacors
                        - Super Touring - Alfa Romeo -

                            - V8Supercars - CART -

Robert Grave

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Robert Grave » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00

<<the best possible performance for my $>>

Hello David.

I would go with the Celeron.  More RAM ( 128 vs 64 ) will will only provide
you with longer replays.

Also, if you get an ABIT motherboard with "softmenu" (BH-6, BX-6-2), you'll
be able to overclock a Celeron much easier that a P-II.

Robert
Hull, Qubec

John Simmo

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by John Simmo » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00


says...

First, the Abit makes it equally simple to overclock a P2.

Second, I've found that the new Celerons are not as overclockable as the
original C300A.

Third, the overclockability of any CPU is very dependant on what kind of
memory you're running, and when you bought the CPU.

I'm running four P2 systems (all of which are running Abit BX6/2
motherboards) here.

  1) P2/450, PC100 RAM  - overclocked to 504

  2) P2/333, PC66 RAM   - overclocked to 375
     (with PC100 RAM - o/c to 415)

  3) Cel/333, PC66 RAM  - overclocked to 375

  4) Cel/333, PC100 RAM - overclocked to 416

--
=========================================================
Redneck Techno-Biker (Zerex12)
  http://www.members.home.net/jms1/index.html
Barbarian Diecast Collector (370+ cars and counting)
  http://members.home.net/jsimm/diecast_index.html
Internet Grand Prix Series Season 2
  http://www.paddedwall.org/igps2/igps2.html
North American Stockcar Racing Online Competition
  http://www.paddedwall.org/igps2/igps2.html
Super X Philes
  http://members.home.net/kap/superx/superx.html

If you want to send me email, go to the first URL shown
above & click "Send Me Mail" in the contents frame.
=========================================================

Scott B. Huste

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Scott B. Huste » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00

I am currently running a Celeron 400 at 450mhz  (6X75) with 96mb of
non-pc100 SDRAM and have had no problems at all.   Im using an AOpen Ax6BC
motherboard which I am extremely happy with for stability.

Just some additional information <G>

Scott
PA-Scott
High Gear Editor - "The View" - http://www.simracingnews.com
G.T.S. Racing - http://www.GTS-Racing.com

--
Scott B. Husted
ICQ# 4395450

Scottie Smit

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Scottie Smit » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00

If you decide on the PII go with the PIII 450 instead. The PIII may be 5
bucks more or less than the PII and is a better choice at this point.

I have a PIII 450/BX6r2/CAS2 PC100 combo and have successfully oc'd it to
558mhz(too chicken to try 600<G>). Since its enough CPU for now with out oc
I changed it back to normal.

Scottie


>Is this your experience as well?  I'm deciding
>between a Celeron 466 and a PII 450.
>My system will also have:
>128 megs RAM
>4 meg Diamond Monster II (Voodoo2)

Driver

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Driver » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00

There is little performance difference between the PII 450 and the celeron
466.
Keep in mind though, that if you get a PIII 450, you'll be able to upgrade
to the PIII 600 when they come out, or at some point later when you need the
extra power (Nascar with the GPL engine).
The upgrade path for the celeron is not so clear.
The Celeron would be cheaper though.

Kirk Lan

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Kirk Lan » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00


>Keep in mind though, that if you get a PIII 450, you'll be able to upgrade
>to the PIII 600 when they come out, or at some point later when you need

the

From what I've heard, the 600+ MHz chips have been delayed by as much as a
year (at max i hope :)

Whatever chip you go with, get an Abit BH6 or BX6/2 motherboard.  It's
actually a better (more stable!) motherboard than my Asus P2B (PII 350,
3.5x133 BH6 vs 300a, 4.5x100 P2B) and FAR easier to overclock.

You could actually build a GPL-ready computer for cheap if that's all you
want to do...
450+ MHz processor, doesn't matter if it's overclocked to that speed
64 MB RAM
Decent drives
Stealth II S220 (dirt cheap, only 4MB RAM, but with the above processor, GPL
will to 36 constant in 640X480 with all AI and details!)

I imagine the reason faster Celerons are harder to o/c is because I would
bet that the core they use (300a and up, PII 350 and up, all more or less
the same) has its upper limit around 466-500 MHz.  I would bet that most
overclocked Celerons and PII's fit in at 466 or less MHz.  Hence, they were
kind of forced to go to the PIII for 500+ MHz, because if they kept using
the same core, they'd be tossing a whole lot of them out to the lower-speeds
trying to get enough to run 500 at 2.0 volts reliably.

Chris Schlette

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Chris Schlette » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00

Um, no.  The .18 micron P3s have been pushed back about a month or so, but a
P3-600 running at 100mhz (the .18 micron will run at 133mhz FSB) FSB will be
on the market about the same time as the P3s would have come out.  Check out
www.sharkyextreme.com, I know they have a discussino of the Intel road
map....www.anandtech.com might have one too and so might other sites.

Don Burnett

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Don Burnett » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00

There have been numerous reports on the overclocking newsgroups of folks
having good success overclocking the Celeron 366 ppga to 550 mhz on the Abit
boards. Even on a slot 1 mb with a good slotket adapter. At around 70 bugs
for the chip, doesn't sound bad at all. The best success rates have been
with week 19 or newer Malaysia chips. I am seriously thinking about adding
one to my BH6, replacing my 300A which has been running rock solid at 450
since late January.

--
Don Burnette
Dburn on Ten
http://members.home.net/d.burnette/Sportsman%204.htm



> says...
> ><<the best possible performance for my $>>

> >Hello David.

> >I would go with the Celeron.  More RAM ( 128 vs 64 ) will will only
> provide
> >you with longer replays.

> >Also, if you get an ABIT motherboard with "softmenu" (BH-6, BX-6-2),
> you'll
> >be able to overclock a Celeron much easier that a P-II.

> First, the Abit makes it equally simple to overclock a P2.

> Second, I've found that the new Celerons are not as overclockable as the
> original C300A.

snip
Don Burnett

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Don Burnett » Fri, 02 Jul 1999 04:00:00

I'd just about bet ya all 600 mhz chips will require a new motherboard.
--
Don Burnette
Dburn on Ten
http://members.home.net/d.burnette/Sportsman%204.htm


Driver

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Driver » Sat, 03 Jul 1999 04:00:00


I doubt it, the PIII 600 (on the 100MHz FSB) is just a .25 micron PIII,
simular to what is on the market now (execpt 50 MHz faster).

Phillip Arche

PII vs. Celeron for GPL?

by Phillip Arche » Sat, 03 Jul 1999 04:00:00

processor speeds a Celeron would give as


appeared to be EXACTLY the same on both chips. The advantage the P111 has is
that it can be o'clocked further. Mine runs perfectly at 558 (124x4.5) on
PC100 ram. Also the new instruction set on the P111 COULD give you more time
before another upgrade is needed.
In short get a Celeron if money's tight, get  a P111 if you want to o'clock
further - forget the P11 !!
                            Cheers..
                            Phillip...


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.