rec.autos.simulators

> >possibly (hopefully) a new engine or any other details?

> LMFAO !!!!!

> They've 'evolved' their engine since F1 2000 to 2000 CS, to 2001, to 2002,
> to their Nascar line, and then on to this.

> Netcode will still be arse, gfx a bit inefficient, controller setup still
> troublesome for some, physics a little questionable in places, tracks
> inaccurate.

> Doug

> > Why are you "LMFAO"?
> > ISI did a NASCAR line?
> Their engine did. They developed the engine incrementally - one increment
> being a Nascar title.

> >You don't even know what the hell you are talking
> > about.
> OK - fair enough. Do you?

> >Did you bother to go read the article the guy was posting about?
> Yup

> >EA
> > used the ISI engine for a NASCAR game, but ISI didn't do one.
> It's ISI's engine. ISI developed it. It's an increment of the same engine
> that powered all it's F1 titles before, and this one to come. Developments
> that will show within the new F1 title over the older F1 titles, will
> probably have come about as a result of the increment involved in the
Nascar
> title.

> > Also, F12002's
> > physics may not be perfect,
> How true

> > but it's the best F1 sim out there.
> Sadly. Doesnt mean it's good. Technically you could consider GPL an F1
sim -
> and in terms of graphics ( with all the modern updates ), controllers, net
> code, physics - tips any ISI/EA title into a hat.

> >People with
> > proper computers

> OOO - ***y arnt we?
> Athlon 2200, Asus A7N8X, 2x Corsair DDR3200 512mb Ram, Hercules Game
Theater
> XP.   I'd suggest thats fairly 'proper'.

> >and controllers
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> Probably the worlds best publicly availabel FF wheel, and imho, the best
> pedals available.  Yup - fairly 'proper'

> >have no problem with the "gfx a bit
> > inefficient, controller setup still troublesome for some"

> Indeed they do.  Infact, I have very good controller and GFX performance
> within F12k2. However - a huge percentage have problems with controllers.
> The controller system within ISI's titles is totally pathetic. Compare to
a
> Papyrus title. I'm NOT a papy fan boy - BUT, their controller system is
> simple, efficient, effective, works first time every time.  Ash
McConnell's
> just about the only other chap to have come close - and perhaps NetKar as
> well - but ISI are doing as well with their controller setup code as they
> are with their Netcode. It's basically - funny.

> To suggest otherwise is chronic ignornace, stupidity, or lying. Take your
> pick.

> > Are you still Laughing your ass off?
> Not as much -it's not quite as fun having to explain exactly where you're
so
> missguided - but - yeah - I think I'm still laughing quite a bit

> Doug

> F1 Career Challenge* - the first major innovation in FORMULA ONE games for
> many years, will ship in April for the PlayStation?2 computer
entertainment
> system, the Xbox video game system by Microsoft and the Nintendo GameCube.

> > I saw on bhmotorsports.com that EA is releasing a new F1 sim using
> > their 99/00/01/02 licenses.  Anyone know if this is a new ISI product
> > with possibly (hopefully) a new engine or any other details?

> > Jason

> F1 Career Challenge* - the first major innovation in FORMULA ONE games for
> many years, will ship in April for the PlayStation?2 computer
entertainment
> system, the Xbox video game system by Microsoft and the Nintendo GameCube.

> > I saw on bhmotorsports.com that EA is releasing a new F1 sim using
> > their 99/00/01/02 licenses.  Anyone know if this is a new ISI product
> > with possibly (hopefully) a new engine or any other details?

> > Jason

> > Whatever, all that ***you wrote is still no excuse to be a***......

> Oh dearey me.

> Confusing facts for 'crap'

> Confusing suggesting that ISI's next F1 title will be nothing
spectacularly
> different to what has gone before with "being a***"

> And confusing me for someone who really cares WHAT you think.

> Doug