I'm going up to a 750 Athlon, with 128Mb 100Mhz RAM. After including
something like a 3D Blaster, it will cost about 400 (uk pounds)
including tax - about 550 dollars.
A lot of money for one game, isn't it :-)
I can almost smell the lap records though hahahaha
JB
>>Once upon a time I was rather quick on GP2, and am looking forward to
>>GP3 - but it's going to mean a system upgrade.
>>I'm planning on going to an Athlon 750 + suitable motherboard, 128Mb
>>RAM, but I'm not sure about the graphics card.
>>Is it really worth going for a name card like a Voodoo 5000, or will
>>something like a 3D Blaster TNT2 do it?
>>All it's for is GP3!
>The demo that was shown on various shows was reported as running on a
>Matrox G400 card.
>Anyway: the only safe approach is to wait at least a week after it has
>been released and read performance reports over here. At least that's
>what *I* will do :-)
>You also have to keep in mind that there will be a (more taxing?)GP4
>probably within less than a year, and GP5 (even GP6?) the next
>year(s).
>Personally, I want to be able to play at least the next 3
>"incarnations" with my next system.
>At the moment my preference seems to be to exploit my current system
>to the maximum and wait for the real upgrade until DDR-RAM
>motherboards appear at the end of this year/start of next year.
>GeForceII MX for something like $120. With a bit of luck, it will
>- run GP3 "ok" in something like 800*600
>- run even GP4 if that one exploits the T&L in the GeForceII MX,
>something much more likely if the *cheap* GeForce II MX seriously
>launches T&L-support in games.
>=> enables me to wait a little and buy a system with 266MHz DDR-RAM
>JoH
Jonathan Beckett, Senior Developer
Nutek Services Ltd.
http://www.absplannner2000.co.uk