>I don't get this, can someone please explain. To me, having a deadzone
>should 'prevent' a wandering car because it gives you more play on your
>steering wheel before it moves far enough to go off straight. Therefore
>you can keep the onscreen wheels straight easier whereas, with no
>deadzone, I would imagine it to very difficult to keep the wheels
>completely straight causing the car to wander.
I used to think the same way as you - that's why I never worried about deadzone
before.
The way I understand(now) it is this: The car naturally wants to deviate from
the straight line because of engine torque, camber, etc. Having a large
deadzone in the steering means that your minor corrections to the car's
direction take longer to show up. This makes the corrections seem MAJOR, and
you're constantly 'chasing' the car. With little(or no) deadzone, the
corrections are almost subconscious, thus not noticable.
Chuck, Andre - is that how it works?
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
F1 hcp. +20.90...F2 +151.26...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.