rec.autos.simulators

RASCAR Coca Cola

Colin Harri

RASCAR Coca Cola

by Colin Harri » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 05:43:26



Just got to jump in, here.....technically, we DON'T say 'no passing til
backstraight', but 'no CHANGING LANE to pass before the back straight'. We
run this rule in conjunction with another rule, that says that you
(basically) can't jump a re-start. You have to remain at pace lap speed on a
re-start, not hang back and get an advantage. Therefore, with all cars
running at the same speed into T1, it's logical for me/us to say that you
may not change lane to make a pass until the back straight. Some who haven't
tried it are against the idea, but we've run this for three seasons and
NEVER have re-start problems - there are plenty of guys who read r.a.s and
are also FFRL entrants who will attest.

 Each league has different ways of dealing with things, and in the end it
all comes down to co-operation and respect. We at FFRL have it, I know for
sure that the Finnish league (superbly run by Samuli Takala and Hena
H?kk?nen) has it too, but sadly not all do. Those that don't (either by
disrespectful admin or sloppy racers) are the ones that get into all the
trouble.

jason moy

RASCAR Coca Cola

by jason moy » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 06:15:11


=)

I was joking, but really I dunno what is right.  A driver's head is
practically motionless in the car thanks to the padding and the hans
device so i'm not sure they see much more than we do.

Jason

Mika Takal

RASCAR Coca Cola

by Mika Takal » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:44:10

I agree. Leagues without decent and complete rules aren't leagues at all. A
league might go badly wrong if it has very inconsistant/illogical  rules and
dictatorship-like administration, though.

In the Finnish league we have a rule that you can't change line before S/F
line in a restart, and speed differences gained by leaving inequal gaps
before green can't be taken advantage of. And this works quite well - we
watch every replay carefully and in a set of 100 races, only 1-5 has a
problem with a restart and not much more with T1. It all comes down to the
drivers themselves.

btw, I do help Samuli more than Hena does in administrating our league,
although Samuli's workload is huge :)

--
Mika Takala

Jan Verschuere

RASCAR Coca Cola

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 09:01:41

Are the people in the "Finnish League" volunteering to administer RASCAR as
well?

Jan.
=---

Eldre

RASCAR Coca Cola

by Eldre » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 09:54:25



>Just got to jump in, here.....technically, we DON'T say 'no passing til
>backstraight', but 'no CHANGING LANE to pass before the back straight'. We
>run this rule in conjunction with another rule, that says that you
>(basically) can't jump a re-start. You have to remain at pace lap speed on a
>re-start, not hang back and get an advantage. Therefore, with all cars
>running at the same speed into T1, it's logical for me/us to say that you
>may not change lane to make a pass until the back straight. Some who haven't
>tried it are against the idea, but we've run this for three seasons and
>NEVER have re-start problems - there are plenty of guys who read r.a.s and
>are also FFRL entrants who will attest.

Acceleration rates can vary wildly, as I've noticed.  Therefore, all cars might
NOT be at the same speed at T1.

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
My .sig file is in the shop for repairs...

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Larr

RASCAR Coca Cola

by Larr » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:36:12

Eldred,

I'm not talking about the tape.

I'm talking about the overall feel of the settings.  There is a distinct
difference between the NR2002 FAST Setup and the Fixed Setup we ran
yesterday.  At least on my machine, and since you can't alter the canned
setups, I know mine wasn't changed.

It wasn't the tape.  It was much more than that.

Offline, the FAST setup is slimy, pushy and really dismal to drive.

Online, it was quite reasonable and controllable.

I don't understand the difference, but it was there and it was much more
than the tape.

-Larry




> >I think it came out better than expected because we were 1)Ready for it
due
> >to the pre-race discussions and 2)The actual online FAST setup was
totally
> >different than the Offline FAST setup.  Why I don't know, but it was a
good
> >thing :)

> The only thing that was changed was the tape - from 45% to 40%.  If it
made
> THAT big of a difference in the feel of the car, *I* sure couldn't feel
it...

> Eldred
> --
> Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
> My .sig file is in the shop for repairs...

> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Larr

RASCAR Coca Cola

by Larr » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:38:37

We really don't need to be evaluating mishaps DURING the race.  Bad idea
IMHO.

IMHO we are doing fine just the way it is, and in fact we WERE fine until
this whole subject was brought up.

I'm sorry, but it's time to move along and go back to the great racing we
have been having since the day I started running here.  I see NO need to
change, and NO need to increase the load on the volunteer's.

-Larry



Larr

RASCAR Coca Cola

by Larr » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:43:22

That's the point.  We are NOT a league.

We are just a bunch of guys who get together on Saturdays to, for a little
while, escape the madness of open servers.

The racing is good, the skills are generally higher, and while we all***
up sometimes NONE of it is intentional.

I'm happy with it the way it is, and I saw NO problems until this whole
thing started yesterday with one little post about making rules.

Let's move along and go back to having fun racing.  That's why I'm here.  If
I want to listen to all this bickering about rules, I'll go join a league :)

-Larry



Brian Oste

RASCAR Coca Cola

by Brian Oste » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:07:50

I seem to remember the "Rules" thread coming up before and we all seem
to come to the same conclusion, that the only real rules that are
enforceable in this format are the ones implemented in N2002, the rest
are simply going to be "guidelines" for courteous racing.

Brian Oster


>That's the point.  We are NOT a league.

>We are just a bunch of guys who get together on Saturdays to, for a little
>while, escape the madness of open servers.

>The racing is good, the skills are generally higher, and while we all***
>up sometimes NONE of it is intentional.

>I'm happy with it the way it is, and I saw NO problems until this whole
>thing started yesterday with one little post about making rules.

>Let's move along and go back to having fun racing.  That's why I'm here.  If
>I want to listen to all this bickering about rules, I'll go join a league :)

>-Larry



>> >  Each league has different ways of dealing with things, and in the end
>it
>> > all comes down to co-operation and respect. We at FFRL have it, I know
>for
>> > sure that the Finnish league (superbly run by Samuli Takala and Hena
>> > H?kk?nen) has it too, but sadly not all do. Those that don't (either by
>> > disrespectful admin or sloppy racers) are the ones that get into all the
>> > trouble.

>> I agree. Leagues without decent and complete rules aren't leagues at all.
>A
>> league might go badly wrong if it has very inconsistant/illogical  rules
>and
>> dictatorship-like administration, though.

>> In the Finnish league we have a rule that you can't change line before S/F
>> line in a restart, and speed differences gained by leaving inequal gaps
>> before green can't be taken advantage of. And this works quite well - we
>> watch every replay carefully and in a set of 100 races, only 1-5 has a
>> problem with a restart and not much more with T1. It all comes down to the
>> drivers themselves.

>> btw, I do help Samuli more than Hena does in administrating our league,
>> although Samuli's workload is huge :)

>> --
>> Mika Takala

grubba

RASCAR Coca Cola

by grubba » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:19:46

I second the motion. All those in favor.....aye? aaaaaayayyyyyyyyyyeyeeee


> That's the point.  We are NOT a league.

> We are just a bunch of guys who get together on Saturdays to, for a little
> while, escape the madness of open servers.

> The racing is good, the skills are generally higher, and while we all
***
> up sometimes NONE of it is intentional.

> I'm happy with it the way it is, and I saw NO problems until this whole
> thing started yesterday with one little post about making rules.

> Let's move along and go back to having fun racing.  That's why I'm here.
If
> I want to listen to all this bickering about rules, I'll go join a league
:)

> -Larry


wrote

> > >  Each league has different ways of dealing with things, and in the end
> it
> > > all comes down to co-operation and respect. We at FFRL have it, I know
> for
> > > sure that the Finnish league (superbly run by Samuli Takala and Hena
> > > H?kk?nen) has it too, but sadly not all do. Those that don't (either
by
> > > disrespectful admin or sloppy racers) are the ones that get into all
the
> > > trouble.

> > I agree. Leagues without decent and complete rules aren't leagues at
all.
> A
> > league might go badly wrong if it has very inconsistant/illogical  rules
> and
> > dictatorship-like administration, though.

> > In the Finnish league we have a rule that you can't change line before
S/F
> > line in a restart, and speed differences gained by leaving inequal gaps
> > before green can't be taken advantage of. And this works quite well - we
> > watch every replay carefully and in a set of 100 races, only 1-5 has a
> > problem with a restart and not much more with T1. It all comes down to
the
> > drivers themselves.

> > btw, I do help Samuli more than Hena does in administrating our league,
> > although Samuli's workload is huge :)

> > --
> > Mika Takala

John Pancoas

RASCAR Coca Cola

by John Pancoas » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:47:15

  Lol

John


David G Fishe

RASCAR Coca Cola

by David G Fishe » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:38:15

aye!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


> I second the motion. All those in favor.....aye? aaaaaayayyyyyyyyyyeyeeee



> > That's the point.  We are NOT a league.

> > We are just a bunch of guys who get together on Saturdays to, for a
little
> > while, escape the madness of open servers.

> > The racing is good, the skills are generally higher, and while we all
>***
> > up sometimes NONE of it is intentional.

> > I'm happy with it the way it is, and I saw NO problems until this whole
> > thing started yesterday with one little post about making rules.

> > Let's move along and go back to having fun racing.  That's why I'm here.
> If
> > I want to listen to all this bickering about rules, I'll go join a
league
> :)

> > -Larry


> wrote

> > > >  Each league has different ways of dealing with things, and in the
end
> > it
> > > > all comes down to co-operation and respect. We at FFRL have it, I
know
> > for
> > > > sure that the Finnish league (superbly run by Samuli Takala and Hena
> > > > H?kk?nen) has it too, but sadly not all do. Those that don't (either
> by
> > > > disrespectful admin or sloppy racers) are the ones that get into all
> the
> > > > trouble.

> > > I agree. Leagues without decent and complete rules aren't leagues at
> all.
> > A
> > > league might go badly wrong if it has very inconsistant/illogical
rules
> > and
> > > dictatorship-like administration, though.

> > > In the Finnish league we have a rule that you can't change line before
> S/F
> > > line in a restart, and speed differences gained by leaving inequal
gaps
> > > before green can't be taken advantage of. And this works quite well -
we
> > > watch every replay carefully and in a set of 100 races, only 1-5 has a
> > > problem with a restart and not much more with T1. It all comes down to
> the
> > > drivers themselves.

> > > btw, I do help Samuli more than Hena does in administrating our
league,
> > > although Samuli's workload is huge :)

> > > --
> > > Mika Takala

jason moy

RASCAR Coca Cola

by jason moy » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:53:17



>I cannot understand this reluctancy to having a rulebook ??!!??
>In my book we either have a set of rules or *anything goes* - there is no in
>between. If we dont race by the same rules - which we all CLEARLY DON'T - we
>will have yellow upon yellow flag...

I think something that would be interesting instead of "dont' pass
until the backstretch" or "no racing back to the yellow" would be
keeping everything aligned with the real rules of NASCAR but penalize
people for repeatedly doing bonehead things.  If someone is racing
back under yellow and causes an accident by being overagressive, the
person in charge will note that while reviewing the replay and levy an
appropriate penalty.

I dunno.  I'd like to comment further but I don't really know what the
focus of RASCAR is or if it has one.

Jason

Colin Harri

RASCAR Coca Cola

by Colin Harri » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:47:17



Sorry, Mika - didn't know that :-)

jon

RASCAR Coca Cola

by jon » Wed, 24 Jul 2002 20:06:42

I may have missed some info in an earlier post, so apologies if the answer
to this question is further up this thread, but was the weather the same ?


> Eldred,

> I'm not talking about the tape.

> I'm talking about the overall feel of the settings.  There is a distinct
> difference between the NR2002 FAST Setup and the Fixed Setup we ran
> yesterday.  At least on my machine, and since you can't alter the canned
> setups, I know mine wasn't changed.

> It wasn't the tape.  It was much more than that.

> Offline, the FAST setup is slimy, pushy and really dismal to drive.

> Online, it was quite reasonable and controllable.

> I don't understand the difference, but it was there and it was much more
> than the tape.

> -Larry





> > >I think it came out better than expected because we were 1)Ready for it
> due
> > >to the pre-race discussions and 2)The actual online FAST setup was
> totally
> > >different than the Offline FAST setup.  Why I don't know, but it was a
> good
> > >thing :)

> > The only thing that was changed was the tape - from 45% to 40%.  If it
> made
> > THAT big of a difference in the feel of the car, *I* sure couldn't feel
> it...

> > Eldred
> > --
> > Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
> > My .sig file is in the shop for repairs...

> > Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.