about to decide.
www.gamersdepot.com/hardware/video_cards/ati_vs_nvidia/dx9_desktop/00...
www.gamersdepot.com/hardware/video_cards/ati_vs_nvidia/dx9_desktop/00...
If I did get a newer card it would be so I can turn on all the card-based
goodies (FSAA, Anistropic, etc...) and stay at around the same frame
rates/resolution (I run 1280X1024 on my 22" display).
Right now, I'd have to go with a 9800 AIW, but I'm watching the ATI driver
situation very, very carefully before I decide.
-Larry
" If you're still "stuck in the past" and think that ATI is plagued with
driver issues, than go ahead and keep your head stuck in the sand like an
ostrich, buy a 5900 Ultra and then start crying when your pals are smoking
your ass in games like Half Life 2 and Halo because they're running ATI
hardware. "
Mike
http://mikebeauchamp.com
> If I did get a newer card it would be so I can turn on all the card-based
> goodies (FSAA, Anistropic, etc...) and stay at around the same frame
> rates/resolution (I run 1280X1024 on my 22" display).
> Right now, I'd have to go with a 9800 AIW, but I'm watching the ATI driver
> situation very, very carefully before I decide.
> -Larry
> > Just one piece of information out of many, but worth a brief look for
> those
> > about to decide.
>If I did get a newer card it would be so I can turn on all the card-based
>goodies (FSAA, Anistropic, etc...) and stay at around the same frame
>rates/resolution (I run 1280X1024 on my 22" display).
I completely disagree. IMO, ATI has had much better drivers than nvidia
since the Radeon 8500 when they switched to the catalyst program however
nvidia, like they've always done, feeds bs to all who want to listen and
have trained nvidiots to believe whatever they say. Review sites over the
past year have only begun to resist their practice of strong arm tactics.
Remember how nvidia downplayed the whole 3dfx FSAA abilities? Remember how
nvidia reacted to the new 3dmark timedemos? Remember how it was ok once
they started cheating? Like the article says, keep your head buried in the
sand all you want and keep trying to defend your nvidia purchasing decisions
because it provides great comedy to the rest of us!
-Tim
> I completely disagree. IMO, ATI has had much better drivers than nvidia
> since the Radeon 8500 when they switched to the catalyst program however
> nvidia, like they've always done, feeds bs to all who want to listen and
> have trained nvidiots to believe whatever they say. Review sites over the
> past year have only begun to resist their practice of strong arm tactics.
> Remember how nvidia downplayed the whole 3dfx FSAA abilities? Remember how
> nvidia reacted to the new 3dmark timedemos? Remember how it was ok once
> they started cheating? Like the article says, keep your head buried in the
> sand all you want and keep trying to defend your nvidia purchasing decisions
> because it provides great comedy to the rest of us!
However, it's no GPL
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"
http://www.theuspits.com
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--
Ok, let's make it "since the 9700". But that was a year ago, and Nvidia
has spent all the time since then committing consumer fraud over the entire
FX line with their cheating and lying, while ATI has been performing like
gangbusters. There is currently no compelling reason to buy Nvidia cards,
and won't be until NV40, and I expect R420 will upstage that as well.
rms
Please expand upon this if you have the time since I still have time to
cancel my FX5900 ultra order (building a new AMD 2800+ rig) and go with a
9800 pro (or non-pro for the best value).
I'm looking to run mainly sims (flight/racing), sports (Madden 2004, NHL
2004) and a few "hot" shooters (Half-life 2). Why would ATI be the better
choice?
TIA.
--
Joe M.
ATI should perform quite a bit better in HL2 based on the recent
discussions of DX9 performance. Madden and NHL don't exactly push
systems to their limits.
--
Help make Usenet a better place:
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
Don't top post. Trim your messages to include only relevent text.
> Please expand upon this if you have the time since I still have time to
> cancel my FX5900 ultra order (building a new AMD 2800+ rig) and go with a
> 9800 pro (or non-pro for the best value).
http://tech-report.com/etc/2003q2/3dmurk03/index.x?pg=1
There was an earlier one as well, which was talked down afterwards by
both nVidia and 3DMark
Personally I happen to think both cards are plenty fast enough and would
have based my next purchase on image quality rather than raw speed,
assuming both had somewhat similar performance, and most reputable sites
these days give ATI the nod here
As for my personal POV it's useless since I'll never buy an nVidia card
again as long as there's a reasonable alternative :-)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"
http://www.theuspits.com
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--
But for all I know a new card from ATI is imminent within the next 3 weeks,
so maybe you should wait for that car to be released? Apologies if I'm
mistaken about this.
Achim
...
Looking ahead to newer games, there are many reports now that the FX series
of cards performs extremely badly in DX9 pixel shaders, which are heavily
used in the new Tombraider game, as well as HL2 and Doom3. The only
solution for Nvidia seems to be in lowering image quality to compensate.
There are several threads on
http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=14
discussing this, including one from John Carmack.
rms
> > Ok, let's make it "since the 9700". But that was a year ago, and
Nvidia
> >has spent all the time since then committing consumer fraud over the
entire
> >FX line with their cheating and lying, while ATI has been performing like
> >gangbusters. There is currently no compelling reason to buy Nvidia
cards,
> >and won't be until NV40, and I expect R420 will upstage that as well.
> >rms
> I can agree with that and that is why I am buying a 9800pro soon, even
> though I know the drivers won't be as *compatible* with all my games
> as the ATI drivers will be. But that is a sacrifice I am willing to
> make to gain performance over my aging Ti4200. I'm not saying the card
> is not good, I'm just saying the drivers are not as compatible as
> Nvidia drivers. I know this from reading various news groups and web
> forums. I play all genres of games so maybe your experience is not as
> varied as mine is.
--
Joe M.
> Just one piece of information out of many, but worth a brief look for those
> about to decide.
http://www.techreport.com/etc/2003q3/valve/index.x?pg=1
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"
http://www.theuspits.com
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--