rec.autos.simulators

Is GPL good practice for N3?

Don Hancoc

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by Don Hancoc » Thu, 04 Feb 1999 04:00:00

Okay, I've got on my flame-retardant suit...  I'm sure it's been covered
before, but dejanews is SUCH a pain in the ass (to me) so I'm gonna ask
again:
    We all know N3 is gonna use GPL's engine.  We also know that there's
VERY little in common between a 1967 Lotus and a 1996 Chevy Monte Carlo (or
98 Ford Truck).  Would it be good practice to prepare for N3's new physics
to use GPL?  From many posts by others it's superiority in modelling may be
a BAD thing for those of us that still prefer NR99 et al for our "normal"
racing fix.
    Whaddaya think?  I PLAN on trying the demo, but haven't just yet.

"Gunner"
ORSA Bronze #78 Navy Dodge

Gary Silverma

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by Gary Silverma » Thu, 04 Feb 1999 04:00:00

This brings up a topic that has not really been debated. Which sim prepares
drivers better for N3: GPL or N2/99? I would have to think that GPL prepares
you better because the engine is so much different than N2/99. However,
N2/NR1999 does give you the experience of oval racing and the prefered
racing lines on all of the tracks. The answer is: Know how to drive BOTH.

Antoine Renaul

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by Antoine Renaul » Fri, 05 Feb 1999 04:00:00



Or maybe drive N2/99 tracks in GPL?

;o)

A. Renault

NanaKo

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by NanaKo » Fri, 05 Feb 1999 04:00:00

     If that's the way NASCAR 3 is going to be, then YES, I would definetly get
proficient at GPL.........
meij

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by meij » Fri, 05 Feb 1999 04:00:00

The cars, though, will feel more like N2 or N99 than GPL. How anyone can think
that the same physics engine will mean that the cars feel the same I don't
know.

M



>     If that's the way NASCAR 3 is going to be, then YES, I would definetly get
>proficient at GPL.........

mike barlo

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by mike barlo » Fri, 05 Feb 1999 04:00:00

        If I may add....  Every time tou run N2 against the Ai you gain

time you run GPL... Viper Racing.. NFS3.. ect.. ect.. You gain
expieriance.

        Whether or not the same physics engine is used in N3.  The more times
you race against your self, AI, Online, You gain expieriance.

So, Do I think you should practice with GPL in hopes that it will help
you in N3?  Any SIM that you use will help you with N3.  YES, Run GPL!

For that mater, Run as many Racing SIMs as you can as often as you can.

Just my $0.02 worth,
Mike Barlow


> The cars, though, will feel more like N2 or N99 than GPL. How anyone can think
> that the same physics engine will mean that the cars feel the same I don't
> know.

> M



> >     If that's the way NASCAR 3 is going to be, then YES, I would definetly get
> >proficient at GPL.........

--
Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
MikeBa on the TEN network.
Racing online with the help of......

Race Communications Association
http://members.xoom.com/RCA/toc.html

Holodyne Engineering

Mystic Music

Don Hancoc

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by Don Hancoc » Fri, 05 Feb 1999 04:00:00


>So, Do I think you should practice with GPL in hopes that it will help
>you in N3?  Any SIM that you use will help you with N3.  YES, Run GPL!

    What brought my question about was that many people are making comments
about how they can no longer drive (insert sim name here) as fast as before
because they've been driving GPL.  The physics are SO much different from
what's out there right now that they have to driver DIFFERENTLY.
    I tend to agree with an earlier post about using NR99 (which I LOVE,
BTW) for better practice.  WC cars handle so much more differently than a
'67 Lotus that it may alter my style TOO much ('course NOTHING could really
hurt my style any worse <G>).  While GPL shows us what the next generation
will bring, you have to drive a Lotus differently from a Monte Carlo, or a
McLaren, or a Dodge Truck, or a Mustang...  Variety isn't NECESSARILY a good
thing, I'd think...

"Gunner"
ORSA Bronze #78 Navy Dodge

Thad Failo

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by Thad Failo » Fri, 05 Feb 1999 04:00:00

My two cents...

Few days ago, I was watching the 95 Nascar season in review. In it they had
a interview with Gordan after and accident.  In that interview, he had
stated that he had no place to go.  He pick the high line over the low line
due to the possiblity of spinning the car.  I have heard other drivers say
basically the same thing.  When was the last time you spun, in N2, trying to
avoid a wreck?  Now, I have spun many-a-time after hitting the car infront
of me, I have even spun on my own.  I don't believe I have ever worried
about spinning when trying to avoid a wreck.

I was running GPL at my friends house.  We where running at Monza.  My
biggest problem, was gearing down for the hair pin.  I kept locking up the
rear tires and kicking the rear wheels out, because I was gearing down too
fast.  Never happened to me in N2...  Oh, by the way, the three laps that I
did complete in a race at Monza, was some of the best sim racing I have ever
seen.

The biggest problem, I have with road racing, is learning the track.  22
miles at the ring (not going to try and spell it.) NASCAR tracks are mostly
ovals.  Not much to learn for each track. That leaves more time learning to
drive the car and less to worry about whether the next turn goes left or
right and how tight it is.

I feel that GPL is forcing me into a proper or better drive style.

My two cents....

John Tomlinso

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by John Tomlinso » Fri, 05 Feb 1999 04:00:00

Well, being a proffecient <cough cough> N2/N99 racer, and owning GPL, I can
offer my comment that, GPL isnt much "practice" for Nascar3/Nascar2000
(whichever it will be called) But rather a sneak peak at the Physics engine.
IMHO,(I might also add my HOPES) Those darn 67 F1 cars are just a tad over
out of control. N3 should bring about more control with the additon of a few
thousand lbs and the addition of downforce via spoilers and airdams that the
67 cars just dont have. I just think that, though not "easy" to drive, stock
cars are easier to handle than those little death rockets.
NOW that being said, GPL is and AWESOME sim in its own right. The physics
are TOP NOTCH. It brings the feeling of acceleration and braking right into
your grasp. The AI is by far the smartest I have ever witnessed in a driving
sim, showing the hopeful future to our Nascar series from Papy.
I didnt buy GPL to "practice" for N3, but to get an idea of what N3 would
be.........and now I race GPL not to get an idea or practice for N3, but to
enjoy racing. Now if I could just be good at it.....hehe
So buy it to glimpse the future of things to come, and race it to enjoy
racing.
Enjoy
JT
John Tomlinson
JonGue

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by JonGue » Fri, 05 Feb 1999 04:00:00



Hi Don,

The simple answer is that N2 has always been 2D. The physics model has
concentrated on modeling the basics of a stock car, and as of now, it
is still the most realistic we have. I have learnt that to drive N2
fast, you can give inputs that in reality would leave the car in the
wall very quickly. To qual fast at Rockingham you would enter turn1,
using the maximum amount of brakes, and a  ton of steering. Thankfully
the tire wear model means a more realistically smooth entrance is
required in a long race. N2 is every bit as challenging to drive
*fast*, over a large distance such as a fuel window, as it is to stay
on the track in GPL. Just with N2, the physics are not developed to
the level where small changes in throttle, brake, weight distribution,
steering and a plethora of forces that I can sense and see happening
in real life but do not know the names of.

In GPL, just about all these effects are plugged into the physics
engine. My guess is that with N3, going from no throttle to full
throttle quickly will kick the rears spinning at just about any turn
on the WC calendar. This may be a lot easier to catch due to weight of
these vehicles, but will be no good to tire wear... Dabbing the brakes
will cause the car to be upset, to much weight forward, you're at a
steady equilibrium on a banked oval, a loose condition shall be coming
your way very soon.

I can't wait for the demo. :-T ~~~

Cheers,



-:http://www.simproject.com/ccg/

Byron Forbe

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by Byron Forbe » Sat, 06 Feb 1999 04:00:00

Simple one this. If you get good at GPL, then you will be REAL good at any other sim! :)


> Okay, I've got on my flame-retardant suit...  I'm sure it's been covered
> before, but dejanews is SUCH a pain in the ass (to me) so I'm gonna ask
> again:
>     We all know N3 is gonna use GPL's engine.  We also know that there's
> VERY little in common between a 1967 Lotus and a 1996 Chevy Monte Carlo (or
> 98 Ford Truck).  Would it be good practice to prepare for N3's new physics
> to use GPL?  From many posts by others it's superiority in modelling may be
> a BAD thing for those of us that still prefer NR99 et al for our "normal"
> racing fix.
>     Whaddaya think?  I PLAN on trying the demo, but haven't just yet.

> "Gunner"
> ORSA Bronze #78 Navy Dodge

--
 Byron Forbes
 Captain of Team Lightning Bolt

 http://members.tripod.com/~HOSHUMUNGUS

    and

 http://www.frontiernet.net/~godsoe/bolt/home.htm

chog..

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by chog.. » Sat, 06 Feb 1999 04:00:00

  Getting the hang of the new physics model in GPL  will defenitly
help out with N3 and Cart2 sims to come.The new physics model is dead
spot on IMO and a car is a car is a car.BUT theres a little catch
here.Many Nascar tracks have extreme banking and this requires a
totally different approach to driving.Oval track racing is a totally
different ball game compared to tracks with less banking.I read in
many racing books that you DONT want oversteer on ovals.You want a car
that understeers slightly on throttle.With flat tracks you want slight
oversteer on throttle application to help you steer the cars thru
turns.I figure that Nascars have a tendency to understeer heavily from
the weight of the huge motor resting on the front wheels and
overloading them.

Papyrus states that their new physics model is excellent in that to
model a new type of car they just punch in its variables and it
handles like its real life counterpart.Nascars have   weightmore
HP,more stable suspension,front engined,etc.etc..But like i said
before a car is a car is a car.Nascars or Cart cars or 67F1 cars all
experience weight transfer from braking and acceleration.Of course
they all handle differently but the basics stay the same.Well most
likely find that N3 will be much easier then GPL since no grip tires
on low banked turns is gonna require some very artful driving to race
quick on:)))))
Skeeter



Michael E. Carve

Is GPL good practice for N3?

by Michael E. Carve » Sun, 07 Feb 1999 04:00:00


% Okay, I've got on my flame-retardant suit...  I'm sure it's been covered
% before, but dejanews is SUCH a pain in the ass (to me) so I'm gonna ask
% again:
%     We all know N3 is gonna use GPL's engine.  We also know that there's
% VERY little in common between a 1967 Lotus and a 1996 Chevy Monte Carlo (or
% 98 Ford Truck).  Would it be good practice to prepare for N3's new physics
% to use GPL?  From many posts by others it's superiority in modelling may be
% a BAD thing for those of us that still prefer NR99 et al for our "normal"
% racing fix.
%     Whaddaya think?  I PLAN on trying the demo, but haven't just yet.

Yes!  But, don't bother if you still want to run N2/99, as the GPL
experience may just sour you on the lame physics in N2. ;-)

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.