I think they look like BUGS...The Ferrari especially reminds me of a
Preying Mantis the way the nose is elevated. And the square foot boxes
like in the McClarens just don't doit for me. I STILL, after a year and
half, can't get used to those rollbar cameras with the wheels pinched in
and the elevated nose blocking the front of the car...just doesn't seem
right. Gimmie the Ferrari's of Prost and Mansell, the McLarens of Prost
and Senna..not the Senna, Andretti, Hakkinen ones, and the Williams of
Prost, Hill, Villenuve. The earlier williams had that funny hump on the
nose too.
I like wings...big wings..not those tiny 3 element breakable jobbies
they use today. Because of that...the WSC cars always catch my eyes,
that big wing going the full width of the car on a SP333, or R&S
MKIII. The newer Sports cars all have a F1 nose built between the
front-wheel fenders...yuck!(Lola, Reynard, Audi) Sure they may be
faster...but they just don't have the "look." And the CART Lola from
the eary '90's has what should be a classic shape. Mikey Andretti's
VERY POINTED nose bumping up against rear facing in-car camera shots.
Those were cool. Todays cars all look like they once had a broken nose
that healed poorly. (recurring theme here)
dave henrie
Ugliest F1 car other than todays bugs would be that hideous McClaren
with the baby wing over the air box. Have I left anyone out? :>
> Debatable... I quite like them (shape, some liveries are hideous), there is
> something pleasing about the purposefulness of the cars. Then again, I
> probably have a warped sense of esthetics.
> Jan.