I know nothing about Sierra's financial situation.
Do you really believe this? You think that a game like Nascar can be cranked
out quickly, then the company sits on it instead of selling it? I hope this was
a joke.
Papyrus is releasing the patch for free, how is that 'trying to make money?' If
all Sierra wanted to do was make money from us, they would release a new
version of the game and make you pay another 50 bucks instead of making it a
patch for existing users. I don't think that the guys at Papyrus are my
friends, nor do I think they're greedy scum-sucking bastards. I don't know
them. But I like getting things for free.
I work. I just bought myself a new Pentium Pro system. I'm also in college (on
summer 'break' right now of course.) I don't believe in doing any job halfway
either. If I make a mistake or do something wrong I own up to it and make
things right, as i'm sure Papyrus will do based on their past postings here.
But nobody is giving them a chance to explain themselves.
It's true that Papyrus doesn't have any direct competition in the driving sim
market. If there was a better product out, i'd own it. My whole point is that
you said you expect software to be bug-free and perfect when it first comes
out. Not even a company with the money and resources of Microsoft can do that;
witness Windows 95. Indycar 2 is very playable, and does everything it's
supposed to do. Papyrus hasn't made any false claims about it's capabilities.
I still remember back in the 80's when software companies would release buggy,
unusable software, and go right out of business. These days that doesn't happen
too often, luckily. When a company releases a product, patches the bugs, and
even talks with users, i'm more than happy because I remember how things used
to be. When I see people whine and complain that a patch isn't out on time, I
think they must not have been really ripped off yet. Good customer support is
still a bonus, not the norm, in this industry.