"Dave Henrie" said:
OH! Have some faith innit Dave! :-)
--
ed_
-----------------------------------------------------
*$20* says Petter Solberg wins the 2003 WRC. :-)
"Dave Henrie" said:
OH! Have some faith innit Dave! :-)
--
ed_
-----------------------------------------------------
*$20* says Petter Solberg wins the 2003 WRC. :-)
> > $50 for a game I'll spend at least 100 hours playing is a good deal
> > IMHO.
> Agreed!
> I predict alot of wothers will make the switch too... once the Papy-server
> are gone from NR2002.... And with servers gone - drivers will go too...
> Could you [critical] guys imagine going back to N4 now?
> Thats the samer story with N2003... once you see it's improvements - I'll
> bet ya a buck you wouldnt return to NR2002 for 5 minutes....
> --
> ed_
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> $10 says Petter Solberg wins the 2003 WRC.
One updated track.
I'm the last person to complain about paying for a sim. The price of the
games themselves are incredibly cheap cosidering how much time we use them
and enjoyment we get out of them.
David G Fisher
>One updated track.
Jason
rofl
--
Tim White
www.intracmotorsports.com
I'll assume this will be the start of the "I'm not paying $50 for a patch"
thread that we had when ...
> >You guys didn't read jason's post. He said that almost the entire $50
would
> >be worth paying just for an updated pocono track.
> >One updated track.
> Dave I look at it this way. I spent $50 on Nascar Thunder and played
> it for less than 4 hours before it became a coaster. $50 for
> something that is simply Nascar 2002 with a more accurate Pocono
> wouldn't be a bad deal.
> Jason
> I noticed:
> 1) Sun Flare Effect (Sunset and Daylight...The sunset in your face effect
> was quite nice, I thought...)
> 2) Animated JumboTron Screens in the Infiield
> 3) Backlit Tach at night
> 4) Better looking infield-side lights at night
> 5) Pit signs waving over every stall while pitting (that's gonna be
> interesting...) with a "war wagon" at each stall (didn't notice any animated
> crew members...)
> 6) You only see about 3/4 of the rear view mirror in the***pit view
> But, your main point holds true. The cars still don't look like they are
> "carving" their way around the track. They still have a "shape riding on
> top of a texture" look to them.
> JCB
> I too, was viewing the hi-rez version...
Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank:-0.381
N2002 Rank:+17.59
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.