rec.autos.simulators

Vista license agreement is a joke

Garro

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Garro » Sun, 15 Oct 2006 04:08:59

http://www.racesimcentral.net/://
raam..

Vista license agreement is a joke

by raam.. » Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:50:55


> http://www.racesimcentral.net/://

I will suggest they will have to change that as vista sales will be hit
*** that single issue alone
mls06

Vista license agreement is a joke

by mls06 » Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:05:56



>> http://www.racesimcentral.net/://

> I will suggest they will have to change that as vista sales will be hit
> *** that single issue alone

http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Mitch_

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Mitch_ » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 01:23:51

I'ts nice when someone finally cuts right through the "net" bullshit.

Mitch

http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_licensing.asp

Garro

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Garro » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:26:04


> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Well, that is even more ***from Microsoft. They are saying even retail XP
is tied to a single device. Why the *** would we buy retail copies of XP
if it is tied to a single device just like OEM? They are just backtracking
and trying to confuse the issue.
Garro

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Garro » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:27:49


> I'ts nice when someone finally cuts right through the "net" bullshit.

> Mitch

Yea, just lay down and take it up the arse like you always do.
Scott B. Huste

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Scott B. Huste » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:40:16



>>http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> Well, that is even more ***from Microsoft. They are saying even retail XP
> is tied to a single device. Why the *** would we buy retail copies of XP
> if it is tied to a single device just like OEM? They are just backtracking
> and trying to confuse the issue.

I just replaced a Hard Drive (not my primary, a second drive) and added
a gigabit NIC card and I had to re-activate Windows.  Had no problem
doing so, but I did have to do it.  It's the first time I've had to do
it, but I guess I'm one of the stupid people who actually owns and paid
for 3 Retail copies of Win XP Pro.   ;)

--
Scott B. Husted
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Garro

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Garro » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 03:01:45


> http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_licensing.asp

Oh yea, thanks for that url. Lots of people are going to find this
"interesting" too.
jason moye

Vista license agreement is a joke

by jason moye » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 03:09:09


> I'ts nice when someone finally cuts right through the "net" bullshit.

I don't see what's been clarified in that article.  The entire point
seems to be that the author doesn't give a shit about the small segment
of the market that is effected in a bad way by the Windows EULA or
product activation.  It's less "this isn't true" and more "this doesn't
effect me so why do I care".
Byron Forbe

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Byron Forbe » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 03:43:26





>>>http://www.racesimcentral.net/

>> Well, that is even more ***from Microsoft. They are saying even retail
>> XP
>> is tied to a single device. Why the *** would we buy retail copies of XP
>> if it is tied to a single device just like OEM? They are just
>> backtracking
>> and trying to confuse the issue.

> I just replaced a Hard Drive (not my primary, a second drive) and added a
> gigabit NIC card and I had to re-activate Windows.  Had no problem doing
> so, but I did have to do it.  It's the first time I've had to do it, but I
> guess I'm one of the stupid people who actually owns and paid for 3 Retail
> copies of Win XP Pro.   ;)

> --
> Scott B. Husted
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

    I ONLY added a NIC card recently and had to re-activate. As you say, it
was simple but also VERY petty on MS's part I thought.
Byron Forbe

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Byron Forbe » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 03:50:18






>>>>http://www.racesimcentral.net/

>>> Well, that is even more ***from Microsoft. They are saying even retail
>>> XP
>>> is tied to a single device. Why the *** would we buy retail copies of
>>> XP
>>> if it is tied to a single device just like OEM? They are just
>>> backtracking
>>> and trying to confuse the issue.

>> I just replaced a Hard Drive (not my primary, a second drive) and added a
>> gigabit NIC card and I had to re-activate Windows.  Had no problem doing
>> so, but I did have to do it.  It's the first time I've had to do it, but
>> I guess I'm one of the stupid people who actually owns and paid for 3
>> Retail copies of Win XP Pro.   ;)

>> --
>> Scott B. Husted
>> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

>    I ONLY added a NIC card recently and had to re-activate. As you say, it
> was simple but also VERY petty on MS's part I thought.

    Hate it when you think of "that other thing" just after you hit "send"!
:)

    How's this for petty - I updated the firmware of my DVD drive and had to
re-activate just a few weeks ago!

    It will be interesting to see how far MS push the envelope. Are the poor
***ers starving over there are they?

Andrew MacPhers

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Andrew MacPhers » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:01:00


> I ONLY added a NIC card recently and had to re-activate.

That's because XP keeps track of minor changes. When you accumulate
enough small changes they add up to a big change and trigger activation.

Anyway, this is a side issue. The real issue is WTF does Vista have
which is worth paying for? Obviously there are always people who must
have the latest car/furniture/vid card/OS, but unlike previous upgrades
XP already provides a pretty solid base, and issues like security are
only issues to people who are careless.

I'll be interested to see how sales go in the first 12 months.

Andrew McP

Tony Rickar

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Tony Rickar » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:03:55



>> I'ts nice when someone finally cuts right through the "net" bullshit.

> I don't see what's been clarified in that article.  The entire point
> seems to be that the author doesn't give a shit about the small segment
> of the market that is effected in a bad way by the Windows EULA or
> product activation.  It's less "this isn't true" and more "this doesn't
> effect me so why do I care".

I don't think this article is relevant to most of us, but as you say to
the majority of Windows users who wouldn't know a graphics card from a
processor let alone open the machine up.

The article is correct for most users and any general hysteria about
Vista licensing is unfounded, although for those with the nouse to
update their hardware on a regular basis it may be a different story...

mls06

Vista license agreement is a joke

by mls06 » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:34:51



>> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> Oh yea, thanks for that url. Lots of people are going to find this
> "interesting" too.

NP, I think only time will tell. From what I got out of the article, the
  EULA only clarifies but doesn't change what we can do, and I emphasise
   "can do". According to this article we are under the same rules with
XP, but I am using the same copy of XP on my 3rd build. It only exists
on one computer at this moment but I have installed it on each major
upgrade (motherboard, cpu, hard drive) without a problem. Yes I had to
activate but I was never prevented from installing it (I'm not saying
that XP has the ability to prevent someone from installing it multiple
times as some are saying Vista will do)). Now here is something funny. I
installed *** 120% and had to call Microsoft and do some 'splainin.
The woman on the other end said she has never heard of that program
triggering a re-activation.

Mike

Bill Worre

Vista license agreement is a joke

by Bill Worre » Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:13:49

That's true that XP keeps track of changes but after 120 days of no changes,
you start fresh with a new baseline based on the current hardware. Also if
you change an item in the same category e.g. video card, you can change it
as many times as you want and you won't be any more likely to have to
activate.

The likely reason that Byron and Scott had to re-activate when they changed
their NIC is that the NIC counts for three "votes".

See WPA info here:
http://aumha.org/win5/a/wpa.htm

It'll be interesting if Vista will work the same way.

The article "debunking" licensing changes mentions that only 5% of PC owners
upgrade their own computers. That may be true but how many upgrade their
friends and relatives computers?  I know that I've upgraded quite a few over
the years. Also, how many people take their machines in to a computer store
and have it upgraded.

Bill



>> I ONLY added a NIC card recently and had to re-activate.

> That's because XP keeps track of minor changes. When you accumulate
> enough small changes they add up to a big change and trigger activation.

> Anyway, this is a side issue. The real issue is WTF does Vista have
> which is worth paying for? Obviously there are always people who must
> have the latest car/furniture/vid card/OS, but unlike previous upgrades
> XP already provides a pretty solid base, and issues like security are
> only issues to people who are careless.

> I'll be interested to see how sales go in the first 12 months.

> Andrew McP


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.