rec.autos.simulators

SCGT & Video cards

Bruce Stanl

SCGT & Video cards

by Bruce Stanl » Fri, 08 Oct 1999 04:00:00

I have got a some extra buks and I wont to upgrade my video card, I am
thinking that I will by a VooDoo 3 2000 16 mg AGP around $90.

I have a  Rage ll C 8mg AGP, AMD 3d 400 128 mg ram. Will I be Able to beat
the price and service with anouther card Manufacturer ?

Wishka

SCGT & Video cards

by Wishka » Sat, 09 Oct 1999 04:00:00

Well I just upgraded from a Voodoo2 to a TNT2 and I'm really disapointed
with SCGT. I can't even go up to 1024x768, the graphics look screwed up and
the screen is really dark eben when i turn up the gamma. Maybe even if the
Voodoo3 2000 is a whole lot slower then a TNT2 Ultra the Voodoo3 will
probably do a better job in SCGT.

Wishkah


Dave Henri

SCGT & Video cards

by Dave Henri » Sat, 09 Oct 1999 04:00:00

  I run a V3 3000 and on some tracks I can easily maintain 1024x760 with
16 cars.  But some of the tracks seem to be more of a hardware hog and
notice some jerkyness.  
dave henrie

> Well I just upgraded from a Voodoo2 to a TNT2 and I'm really disapointed
> with SCGT. I can't even go up to 1024x768, the graphics look screwed up and
> the screen is really dark eben when i turn up the gamma. Maybe even if the
> Voodoo3 2000 is a whole lot slower then a TNT2 Ultra the Voodoo3 will
> probably do a better job in SCGT.

> Wishkah



> > I have got a some extra buks and I wont to upgrade my video card, I am
> > thinking that I will by a VooDoo 3 2000 16 mg AGP around $90.

> > I have a  Rage ll C 8mg AGP, AMD 3d 400 128 mg ram. Will I be Able to beat
> > the price and service with anouther card Manufacturer ?

Bruce Stanl

SCGT & Video cards

by Bruce Stanl » Sat, 09 Oct 1999 04:00:00



Thanks I will take a look at the TNT2 befor I by A card <GBG>

Bruce Stanl

SCGT & Video cards

by Bruce Stanl » Sat, 09 Oct 1999 04:00:00



>On Fri, 08 Oct 1999 04:40:13 GMT,


>> Maybe even if the
>>Voodoo3 2000 is a whole lot slower then a TNT2 Ultra the Voodoo3 will
>>probably do a better job in SCGT.

>uhh.. the Voodoo3-2000 is not slower than a TNT Ultra2.

It may end up that I get the V3 2000. thanks for the input. <GBG>
Bruce Stanl

SCGT & Video cards

by Bruce Stanl » Sat, 09 Oct 1999 04:00:00


 The V3 3000 is outside my price range and I would like one but it seames
V3 2000 may do a better job than the Rage ll C. SCGT does not like the
ATI card. <GBG>


>> Well I just upgraded from a Voodoo2 to a TNT2 and I'm really disapointed
>> with SCGT. I can't even go up to 1024x768, the graphics look screwed up
and
>> the screen is really dark eben when i turn up the gamma. Maybe even if
the
>> Voodoo3 2000 is a whole lot slower then a TNT2 Ultra the Voodoo3 will
>> probably do a better job in SCGT.

>> Wishkah



>> > I have got a some extra buks and I wont to upgrade my video card, I am
>> > thinking that I will by a VooDoo 3 2000 16 mg AGP around $90.

>> > I have a  Rage ll C 8mg AGP, AMD 3d 400 128 mg ram. Will I be Able to
beat
>> > the price and service with anouther card Manufacturer ?

Bruce Stanl

SCGT & Video cards

by Bruce Stanl » Sun, 10 Oct 1999 04:00:00

I Got the Voodoo3 2000 And I am Verry Happy with It It works Much Better
than I thought That It would, I am running every thing at hight res.
And drict 3d not 3dfx and the driect 3d it runs better. Thanks for your
input, your comments helped with the decision. <GBG>


1. SCGT with 1MB video card

2. GPL, N3 and SCGT all on a Compaq 5220, which Video Card?

3. SCGT and Video card choice

4. Questions about Video, & Sound Cards, & Modems

5. Suggestion on a video card with rendition compatible and add on 3dfx card

6. N99 Lock-ups/Video Card/TM ACM Game Card

7. Video Card or Sound Card Tech Problem?

8. Matrox video card & Direct X need help

9. GP2 & Video Cards >>>

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.