and said that it makes sense to upgrade older 2D video cards now to a 3D
card. They said even an inexpensive card like the TNT ($89??) would be a
noticeable improvement.
I currently have an ATI Winturbo (Mach64) PCI video card with 2MB VRAM. I
also have a Monster 3D graphics accelerator. The PC has no AGP or USB
capability at present.
We have a family PC, a Gateway2000 Pentium 233 MMX, 64MB RAM, and a 17"
monitor. It's used as a general purpose machine; my son uses it for ***
and school work (in that order!); the wife surfs the Net and uses MS Office;
my daughter uses it for school work and occasional games; and I use it for
all kinds of things (MS Office, Visual Basic programming, Internet and
e-mail, Linux, and racing simulation games). The performance now seems very
good - in Viper Racing for instance I'm getting about 25 fps frame rate at
full detail, and I get 25-30 fps in MS CART Precision Racing at full detail.
The question is, should I bother to replace my ATI with a newer card?
Should I keep the Monster 3D, or get an all-in-one 2D/3D card? The only
reason I'd want to upgrade is if I'd get a noticeable frame rate increase in
the 3D games, and keep the Linux compatibility.
<remove 7of9 for e-mail replies>
--
Bill Jones e-mail addresses:
(860) 437-5650 WWW: http://www.racesimcentral.net/