rec.autos.simulators

AMD K6-2 or K6-3

Verstraete Kur

AMD K6-2 or K6-3

by Verstraete Kur » Mon, 20 Dec 1999 04:00:00

Now i have a AMD K6-2 333Mhz
What would be the best AMD to upgrade??
An AMD K6-2 450Mhz or a AMD K6-3 450Mhz??
Should it make a great difference in racegames like RC2000 going from an
333Mhz to a 450 Mhz??
I have a savage4 32Mb AGP and 128 Mb ram

Thanks,

Mr Meane

AMD K6-2 or K6-3

by Mr Meane » Tue, 21 Dec 1999 04:00:00

K6-3. The Level2 cache is on the chip, and runs at the clock speed (i.e.
450MHz) whereas the K6-2's L2 cache is on the motherboard and runs at 100MHz
(or 95 Mhz in your current setup). You should see a noticeable difference.

mm


Greg Campbel

AMD K6-2 or K6-3

by Greg Campbel » Tue, 21 Dec 1999 04:00:00


> Now i have a AMD K6-2 333Mhz
> What would be the best AMD to upgrade??
> An AMD K6-2 450Mhz or a AMD K6-3 450Mhz??
> Should it make a great difference in racegames like RC2000 going from an
> 333Mhz to a 450 Mhz??
> I have a savage4 32Mb AGP and 128 Mb ram

> Thanks,

Just yesterday, I sold my K6-2/450 and replaced it with a -3/450.  I can't
say anything about RC2K, but GPL races show a pronounced (Roughly 20~30+ %)
famereate gain. I'm running a SB-Live, 12M-V2, 128M, 1M L2 - oops L3!

I'll run some tests tonight.  Stay tuned for benchmarks.

--

Note!
Anti-spam tactics engaged!
Remove the duplicate "g" and "s" before replying.

Matthias Flat

AMD K6-2 or K6-3

by Matthias Flat » Wed, 22 Dec 1999 04:00:00



Like what?
I have a K6-2 400 and a Rendition card, and they give me usually 36
fps at 800x600 offline, with some eye candy turned off, and maybe
20-25 at the start.
With an upgrade to K6-III 450, can I get 25-30 fps at the start, or
solid 36? Or even switch to 1024x768? I doubt it.

I think the question is: is K6-2 500 or K6-III 450 better for GPL, how
much better?

AFAIR, in general benchmarks, the various AMD K6 CPUs showed very

bus of course), especially compared to the price (in money, and in
terms of trouble with heat and power consumption etc.).
The advantage of the on chip L2 cache depends usually upon the
application.

So, do I keep my K6-2 400 and save money and trouble, or should I get
a 500, or a K6-III 450?

--
Matthias Flatt

Mr Meane

AMD K6-2 or K6-3

by Mr Meane » Thu, 23 Dec 1999 04:00:00


Vooodoo2 with a similar frame rate to what you're getting at 800600, but
with a drop to around 17fps at the start. While
I can't comment on a K6-3's suitablility for GPL as I've never owned one,
the Celeron had 128k of on chip (full speed) L2 cache. Intel chips do have
better FPU performance than AMDs in general, but as Alison Hine says:

"I have no experience with the K6-2, although I have run GPL for months on a
K6-200 overclocked to 75 x 2 = 225. This processor worked very well, and its
superior performance in comparison to my P-233 suggests that the FPU
superiority of the Pentium over the AMD K6 was not as important as running
the L2 cache at a higher speed"

which would suggest the K6-3 would give a noticeable increase in performance
in GPL

Can't say for sure, never benchtested one. And I've never used a Rendition
card either.

> AFAIR, in general benchmarks, the various AMD K6 CPUs showed very

> bus of course), especially compared to the price (in money, and in
> terms of trouble with heat and power consumption etc.).
> The advantage of the on chip L2 cache depends usually upon the
> application.

It appears GPL uses the L2 cache heavily from reading Alison's site.

Up to you. But K6s are dead cheap in England, and I personally would go for
a K6-3 over a K6-2.

Hope that helps

mm

Jalo

AMD K6-2 or K6-3

by Jalo » Thu, 23 Dec 1999 04:00:00

If I were you, I'd wait until I could get an Athlon (like a 500 or 550
really cheap). Your not going to see much difference going from a K6-2 400
to either a k6-2 500 or even to a K6-III 450.
You will see a major difference between your K6-2 and an Athlon.
And to the other post, GPL wants a good floating point unit. GPL doesn't
care much about cache, (as is the case with most 3d intensive games).


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.