I'm not sure when you became super moderator of the newsgroup, but I
don't need the lecture about "narrow-mindedness". Last I checked, I was
still entitled to express my opinion. If you, or anyone else doesn't
agree, then feel free to express your own opinion.
I do enjoy F1 racing (in fact prepping for the USGP). But if you are
totally honest with yourself, then you have to admit that in many ways
it is devoid of "action". I don't need constant passing, but when a
race has 1 leader and zero lead changes, then something isn't right. In
contrast, the GP2 series adds a little bit of ground effects to the
cars and now they can run nose to tail lap after lap and even challenge
one anothers position ON TRACK.
Silverstone, a week or so ago. Aside from Shumi "passing" Kimi via the
pits, what else was exciting? Fred Alonso walking away AGAIN? The lap 1
melee with Ralf, Speed and another driver? Jenson Button showing why he
is tremendously overrated? Heck, I'll even throw in anything related to
Super Aguri!
> | LOL....."action"...good one.
> |
> |
> One person's action is not another person's action. It's a bit
> narrow-minded, I believe, to think that just because you or anyone else
> finds Soccer or Formula 1 devoid of action, then it must be so. There are
> many who think basketball or football or NASCAR are action-less. You like
> what you like, without damning those who don't like what you like.
> I love Formula One and find Soccer intriguing. But the general premise and
> subject of this thread is probably correct. If money can't be made (and
> that's all most people think about, as if they can take all their money with
> them, to the grave and beyond), then no one has any interest.
> Alanb
