rec.autos.simulators

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

Thomas C Norwo

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by Thomas C Norwo » Sun, 14 May 2000 04:00:00

I have just started researching F1 racing games on the PC and F1 2000 was
the first one I looked at, mainly because I love the NFS series.

Anyway, I have read some comments in the group and my main concern is
(Gamespot also mentioned this) that the game requires A LOT of juice to
run well.  My system:

PII450
384MB SDRAM
12MB Creative Labs 3D Blaster Voodoo2
16MB Matrox Mill II
25GB of HD space (2 x 12.7GB)

I get the feeling that this game would be useless on my system.  I am VERY
anxious to race Nurburgring and Hockenheim!  Gamespot suggests a PIII650
minimum.

Will this game run okay on my system?  If not, are there any other F1
games that people could recommend?  Keep in mind the above two tracks...
:)

Any suggestions appreciated...

Thanks,

   - Tom N.

==============================================================================

"Ferrari is the epitome of mechanical beauty and Ferraris are acquired by
 men who wish to turn their dreams into reality and inject into their
 lives a long period of youthful passion.  I guess this is why there is
 Ferrari and then there is everything else."

    - Enzo Ferrari, on the Ferrari mystique (Translated from Italian)

==============================================================================

mas..

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by mas.. » Sun, 14 May 2000 04:00:00


Although both NFS and F12K are published by EA Sports, they have little else
in common as they come from different developers.  EA just pays the
bills, exercises some control, and makes the profits.

I have a C300a oc'd to 450 with a V3-2000.  Yes, it requires a lot of fiddling
to get acceptable framerate sometimes.  Yes, it is frustrating.  Yes, I
think it should be better for the level of graphics detail.  But if you are
willing to toy with it, say by reducing some of the detail levels to medium or
high instead of max, reducing number of drawn vehicles, and most importantly,
disabling mirrors (a big negative to your situational awareness), you'll get
reasonable framerate.  And it'll still look good.  When hot-lapping, you'll
have no problem cranking up the detail when you're the only one on the course.

I'm not sure it'll even be that great with a 650, but again, I think a 450 can
satisfy you, if you play with it.

I'm racing (as probably most are right now), Nurnurgring.  The AI drivers like
to spin out (1/3rd the time?) at Ford.  But there's a patch for that at
bhmotorsports.com.

After the graphics/framerate issue, the AI is my main beef.  Many tracks
feature a turn or turns where the AI just goes brain-dead.  More than
that, I think the AI is just plain bad.  They don't know how to overtake,
weaving wildly.  And their throttle control is all over the place.

Not a rave review I know.  Still, I prefer it to GP2 and the Ubisoft titles
(F1 Racing Sim and the sequel Monaco Grand Prix RS2) that I have.

OTOH, if what you really like is the NFS set, which is much less sim-oriented
than all of these, I'm not sure which you'll prefer.  Hmmm, probably F12K, or
perhaps one of the other more relaxed F1 sims out there.

Simon Brow

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by Simon Brow » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00

Either wait for GP3 (looks like it could be a long wait) or get MGPRS2.  F1
2000 in my opinion is nothing special, even on a super-PC.
No

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by No » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00

On Sun, 14 May 2000 00:07:06 GMT, "Simon Brown"

I don't have F12000, but I don't think I would be happy with the frame
rates at all so I'm going to pass on it myself and try to find Monaco
Grand Prix Racing 2. I used to have a F1RS and really liked it. I know
that the Monaco version comes with fake teams and drivers, but there
are hacks to download that fix this. IMO, if frame rates are important
then this one is probably the one to get for now It also has pretty
good AI from what I have read, which is more important than eye candy.
F12000 has crappy frame rates and poor AI. Pass!

--
Nos

DNA

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by DNA » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00

But MGPRS2 is just too much bug, I got about 1/2 the time unable to get into
the game because of hang up. do you have some suggestion? it is surely a
good game and the best modern F1 stimulation up to now.



> On Sun, 14 May 2000 00:07:06 GMT, "Simon Brown"

> >Either wait for GP3 (looks like it could be a long wait) or get MGPRS2.
F1
> >2000 in my opinion is nothing special, even on a super-PC.

> I don't have F12000, but I don't think I would be happy with the frame
> rates at all so I'm going to pass on it myself and try to find Monaco
> Grand Prix Racing 2. I used to have a F1RS and really liked it. I know
> that the Monaco version comes with fake teams and drivers, but there
> are hacks to download that fix this. IMO, if frame rates are important
> then this one is probably the one to get for now It also has pretty
> good AI from what I have read, which is more important than eye candy.
> F12000 has crappy frame rates and poor AI. Pass!

> --
> Nos

Victor Cha

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by Victor Cha » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00


system.  Using a GeForce SDR.  Graphic settings are on high.  With 22 cars visible, the
game still stutters a bit, but barely playable.


No

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by No » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00


spoke:

I don't have MGPRS2. I had no problems with F1RS, but I did read a
review of MGPRS2 and he said he had problems loading the game too.
Maybe I won't buy it then if it's ***ed that bad. I'm assuming you
have patched it, using latest drivers etc. What vid card are you
using. Maybe the game needs older drivers of glide if you have a V2 or
V3. You can make anygame compatible with older versions of glide by
extracting the glide.dll and ovl.dll to the game directory. It will
then use that version of glide.
--
Nos

J. P. Hovercraf

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by J. P. Hovercraf » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00

Try disabling your virus scanner before trying to launch MGPRS2. Worked for me.

J. P. Hovercraft


> But MGPRS2 is just too much bug, I got about 1/2 the time unable to get into
> the game because of hang up. do you have some suggestion? it is surely a
> good game and the best modern F1 stimulation up to now.



> > On Sun, 14 May 2000 00:07:06 GMT, "Simon Brown"

> > >Either wait for GP3 (looks like it could be a long wait) or get MGPRS2.
> F1
> > >2000 in my opinion is nothing special, even on a super-PC.

> > I don't have F12000, but I don't think I would be happy with the frame
> > rates at all so I'm going to pass on it myself and try to find Monaco
> > Grand Prix Racing 2. I used to have a F1RS and really liked it. I know
> > that the Monaco version comes with fake teams and drivers, but there
> > are hacks to download that fix this. IMO, if frame rates are important
> > then this one is probably the one to get for now It also has pretty
> > good AI from what I have read, which is more important than eye candy.
> > F12000 has crappy frame rates and poor AI. Pass!

> > --
> > Nos

Joel Willstei

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by Joel Willstei » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00



Tom,

    I'm running F1 2000 on a AMD K6-2/450, 128 MB of SDRAM, & Voodoo3 3000
AGP. After some tweaking it's very drivable everywhere but at the start of a
race unless your on the front row.

Joel Willstein

chainbreake

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by chainbreake » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00


> The game couldn't even run with everything max out under 1027 x 768 with

> system.  Using a GeForce SDR.  Graphic settings are on high.  With 22 cars
visible, the
> game still stutters a bit, but barely playable.

It doesn't perform any better than you describe with an 800 that has all the
bells and whistles at those settings, either.   Or even with some of the
graphics and other options scaled back to medium or less.

I kept wanting to like F12K, but it's just not there.  OK for hot lapping or
fooling around with 3 or 4 other cars on the track during practice sessions,
but that's about it as far as I'm concerned.

Jerry Morelock

Greg Cisk

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by Greg Cisk » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00


No it doesn't. However, it is fine during a race at 800x600 with
a 12MB voodoo2 card on my P3-600E. 25+fps in test and
20 in a full field race. Only a fool would turn everything to the
max, it simply is not necessary.

--


chainbreake

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by chainbreake » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00

Nicely sums up why F12K is pretty much worthless.

"It's OK, except when you start" just doesn't cut it for me.  Wonder if you
can turn off graphics display for all cars behind AND ahead?  That might
work--have to try it and see. :-)

Jerry Morelock

No

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by No » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00


thus spoke:

I consider having mirrors on necessary. Sounds like turning them off
would be a necessity on a P3 500 though.
--
Nos

No

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by No » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00

On Sun, 14 May 2000 11:28:03 GMT, "J. P. Hovercraft"

Does MGPRS2 run fine with no graphics issues on a V3?
--
Nos

Greg Cisk

Opinions WTD: F1 2000 & other recommendations for F1 games

by Greg Cisk » Mon, 15 May 2000 04:00:00



> thus spoke:

> >No it doesn't. However, it is fine during a race at 800x600 with
> >a 12MB voodoo2 card on my P3-600E. 25+fps in test and
> >20 in a full field race. Only a fool would turn everything to the
> >max, it simply is not necessary.

> I consider having mirrors on necessary. Sounds like turning them off
> would be a necessity on a P3 500 though.

It isn't a necessity on a P3-600E. I have the missors on but the details
for the mirrors off.

--



rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.