I don't see that much performance difference between $200 G4 variant and a
9500 Pro except the latter's support of DX9. To GPL fanatics, this means
nothing, but if yer planning on buying a lotta new games this year, you'll
prolly want the Radeon for DX9-only games like Metal Gear Solid and (ugh!)
***rayne.
> > > I'm trying to find out where the two cards stand in relation to each
> > > other. Can't find much that directly compares them. Anyone see
> anything?
> > > dave henrie
> > Just a guess, but you might find this interesting...:-)
> > http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> > Btw, once you start to turn up the resolution and turn on AA, this card
> > does not compete with the 4200......
> > Beers and cheers
> > (uncle) Goy
> The two tests kinda contradict each other. I wonder if the Tom's
Hardware
> test was done with updated drivers? Even the anatech site used 2.x
drivers,
> aren't the 3.x out?
> Basically Toms says the 4200 & 9500pro are very close. Anatech says
that
> (at least up to 1280 screen rez's) the 9500pro is faster. hmmm.
> dave henrie
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.racesimcentral.net/).
> Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/02