rec.autos.simulators

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

J

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by J » Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:58:27

Hi everybody,
Finally I'm going for a new rig and would appreciate some advise.

I'm looking for a mainstream solution,  no budget or high end.
Might be a P4 2.4 (up to 800) or a AMD 2600 for instance.

Also, VIA chipsets are out of of the question after 2 NBT (nothing but trouble)
years with my KT266 A.

I already got an ATI 9600 pro.

Few things I'm not certain about:
How are the P4s compared to the AMDs? 3D Mark says lousy, but that's sponsored
by AMD

If intel chipset, 845 or 865?

Is hyperthreading something not to miss out?

What is the boost from P4 400 over 533 to 800?

The new AMD 64 (Are that those Bartons?) is something to wait for (until
afforadable)?

A lot of questions, any help (also partially) is highly appreciated.

TIA

Jens

 BTW: I was on a XP 1600+ until now

---------------------------------------------
LWFF Ball Bearing conversion at:
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

GPLRank: -14.82
Monsters of GPL: sub 95

J

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by J » Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:02:40

Hi everybody,
Finally I'm going for a new rig and would appreciate some advise.

I'm looking for a mainstream solution,  no budget or high end.
Might be a P4 2.4 (up to 800) or a AMD 2600 for instance.

Also, VIA chipsets are out of of the question after 2 NBT (nothing but trouble)
years with my KT266 A.

I already got an ATI 9600 pro.

Few things I'm not certain about:
How are the P4s compared to the AMDs? 3D Mark says lousy, but that's sponsored
by AMD

If intel chipset, 845 or 865?

Is hyperthreading something not to miss out?

What is the boost from P4 400 over 533 to 800?

The new AMD 64 (Are that those Bartons?) is something to wait for (until
afforadable)?

A lot of questions, any help (also partially) is highly appreciated.

TIA

Jens

 BTW: I was on a XP 1600+ until now

---------------------------------------------
LWFF Ball Bearing conversion at:
http://jensschumi.bravepages.com/

GPLRank: -14.82
Monsters of GPL: sub 95

Larr

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by Larr » Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:59:13

Didn't we just cover this somewhere?

IMHO, the best board out there feature wise is the ABIT IC7-MAX3, and when
the P4 Extreme's come down to earth price wise I'll be getting one.

-Larry


J

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by J » Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:55:19

Sorry

Jens

---------------------------------------------
LWFF Ball Bearing conversion at:
http://jensschumi.bravepages.com/

GPLRank: -14.82
Monsters of GPL: sub 95

J

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by J » Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:55:20

Please ignore,
double posting due to provider problems.

Sorry

Jens

---------------------------------------------
LWFF Ball Bearing conversion at:
http://jensschumi.bravepages.com/

GPLRank: -14.82
Monsters of GPL: sub 95

Steve Simpso

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by Steve Simpso » Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:18:39

My recommendation would be to get a Athlon 2500+ and an Abit nForce2 mobo
and overclock it to 3000+.  There's a lot of people that overclock them to
3200+ but 3000+ is very comfortable for these chips.  Slap in a Radeon 9600
and you'll have a PC which is near the cutting edge for sim racing for very
little money.
J

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by J » Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:26:45

Yup,
my provider went crazy (Or I should get used to 2 days lags until the post shows
up ;-)

Cya

Jens


>Didn't we just cover this somewhere?

<snip>
---------------------------------------------
LWFF Ball Bearing conversion at:
http://jensschumi.bravepages.com/

GPLRank: -14.82
Monsters of GPL: sub 95

Joachim Trens

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by Joachim Trens » Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:22:41

Hi Jens,

you seem to have a fairly solid opinion already on what's good or not.
Hence, I'd suggest you buy exactly what _you_ think is right, because if you
don't, you'll always be worried whether you did the right thing :-)

That said, the AMD 2600 or 3000 (with FSB 400) offer certainly much better
bang for the buck than the P4s or the AMD 64s. The AMD 64s beat all P4s
overall, but whether waiting is worth the while depends on how long you're
willing to wait, I guess :-)

Achim


rms

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by rms » Wed, 22 Oct 2003 07:19:44

    The voice of reason speaks!  I would specify an oem cpu and put a slk947
+ 92mm fan on it.  That combo will comfortably run at 3500+ ratings at
reasonable sound levels.

rms

j[nospam]ca..

OT: new mobo and CPU for simming - best bang for the buck?

by j[nospam]ca.. » Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:40:09

check here:

http://arstechnica.com/guide/system/index.html

A good budget system for around $700.00.  And a good read anyway.

hth,
jeff


>Hi everybody,
>Finally I'm going for a new rig and would appreciate some advise.

>I'm looking for a mainstream solution,  no budget or high end.
>Might be a P4 2.4 (up to 800) or a AMD 2600 for instance.

>Also, VIA chipsets are out of of the question after 2 NBT (nothing but trouble)
>years with my KT266 A.

>I already got an ATI 9600 pro.

>Few things I'm not certain about:
>How are the P4s compared to the AMDs? 3D Mark says lousy, but that's sponsored
>by AMD

>If intel chipset, 845 or 865?

>Is hyperthreading something not to miss out?

>What is the boost from P4 400 over 533 to 800?

>The new AMD 64 (Are that those Bartons?) is something to wait for (until
>afforadable)?

>A lot of questions, any help (also partially) is highly appreciated.

>TIA

>Jens

> BTW: I was on a XP 1600+ until now

>---------------------------------------------
>LWFF Ball Bearing conversion at:
>http://jensschumi.bravepages.com/

>GPLRank: -14.82
>Monsters of GPL: sub 95


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.