Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive
Hardware / Graphics cards

ATI Rage / Mach64

discussed in 891 posts, 1994-2003 · overall tone negative

Posts per month

1 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts1 posts0 posts1995: 0 posts19951 posts0 posts0 posts2 posts5 posts1 posts2 posts4 posts4 posts23 posts9 posts1996: 3 posts19968 posts5 posts1 posts8 posts2 posts40 posts32 posts25 posts19 posts6 posts16 posts1997: 4 posts19975 posts14 posts7 posts1 posts8 posts2 posts9 posts1 posts2 posts15 posts14 posts1998: 9 posts19983 posts10 posts6 posts12 posts7 posts9 posts5 posts4 posts13 posts12 posts16 posts1999: 19 posts199913 posts26 posts15 posts15 posts14 posts12 posts11 posts38 posts19 posts20 posts10 posts2000: 7 posts200027 posts6 posts12 posts11 posts18 posts22 posts31 posts11 posts11 posts6 posts22 posts2001: 5 posts200112 posts1 posts3 posts4 posts6 posts6 posts2 posts0 posts4 posts5 posts8 posts2002: 11 posts20024 posts0 posts0 posts1 posts1 posts3 posts3 posts4 posts0 posts0 posts1 posts2003: 0 posts20030 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts1 posts0 posts2 posts1 posts1 posts

Key threads

  • ATI Rage Fury Pro for racing sims and DVD playback 2000-12-02 · 22 posts
    A user planning to add an ATI Rage Fury Pro for its DVD acceleration asked whether it handled racing sims. Owners of Rage Fury and Rage Fury Maxx cards reported that GPL, N3, NASCAR Heat, GP3 and others ran fine. The thread drifted into whether a PS2 or a standalone DVD player was a better buy for DVD and into 3dfx's future.
  • Low GP2 video scores with ATI Mach64 cards 1996-07-28 · 21 posts
    A user with an ATI Mach64 asked why his GP2 video score was far lower than a Matrox Millennium. Others confirmed ATI cards were slow in DOS, and one who switched to a Matrox reported the score rose from about 100 to 490, worth about 3 fps. John Wallace stressed that the video card makes a big difference.
  • Papa Doc's Voodoo5 vs GeForce3 benchmarks spark long argument 2002-01-14 · 311 posts
    Pierre "Papa Doc" Legrand published benchmarks comparing a Voodoo5 and a GeForce3 in Ghost Recon, NASCAR 4, Quake 3 and flight sims, finding the Voodoo5 competitive with 4x FSAA. Many disputed his methodology, including running 3DMark without hardware T&L, and argued the GeForce3 was better in every way. The thread ran to over 300 posts and degenerated into insults, ending up on multi-monitor and LCD resolution arguments.
  • 3dfx versus Direct3D cards for a friend's new PC 1998-05-24 · 35 posts
    A poster asked what to tell a friend who refused to buy a 3dfx card. Nearly everyone said 3dfx Voodoo cards were essential because many sims, including GPL and F1RS, were 3dfx-only and Voodoo boards also ran Direct3D. A dissenter argued that 3dfx's niche market would shrink as OEMs shipped other chips, which others rebutted by listing PC makers offering Voodoo2 options.
  • NASCAR Racing 3 problems with ATI Rage Pro video 2000-02-07 · 20 posts
    A user with onboard ATI Rage Pro graphics asked how to get NASCAR Racing 3 working. Replies confirmed N3 did not support the Rage Pro and recommended a 3dfx card, either replacing the ATI or adding a Voodoo 2 alongside it as a 3D-only card. Some reported unsupported Quake 3 drivers worked, while Rage 128 owners said N3 and GPL ran.
  • Best video card for Grand Prix 2 frame rates 1996-07-30 · 29 posts
    A user with a Diamond Stealth 64 asked which card would improve GP2 performance. Posters compared Matrox Millennium and ET6000-based Hercules Dynamite 128 scores in the GP2 log, and argued over whether video cards matter at all for GP2. John Wallace held that GP2's code limits the gains from fast cards while ICR2 and NASCAR benefit greatly, and user reports were mixed.
  • Voodoo5 price drop sparks 3dfx versus nVidia debate 2000-11-18 · 96 posts
    A Voodoo5 deal led to a long argument mainly between Keystone and Pierre Legrand over 3dfx's driver quality, FSAA, bandwidth and dual-chip design compared with nVidia's GeForce line. Many sim racers preferred the Voodoo5 for stability and FSAA, while Keystone argued 3dfx's design was dated and the company was failing.

Sentiment by year

Each post that discussed it was rated from −2 (very negative) to +2 (very positive).

YearPostsPositiveNegativeTone
1994210positive (+0.50)
1995511113mixed (+0.00)
19961651855negative (-0.28)
199782530negative (-0.38)
19981061326mixed (-0.11)
19992122563negative (-0.21)
20001843655mixed (-0.13)
200156421negative (-0.36)
200228610mixed (-0.18)
2003511mixed (+0.00)

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy