and ran around town, trying to find a copy at full price when it was
announced that it was going on nice price - luckily, I got the full priced
version).
After GPL, there has been the WSC hype. There has been a few demos from
individuals, there has been a few Nascar games from Papy. There has been
LFS, and some efforts from Codemasters.
The response from the community on (almost) every effort from commercial
companies besides those individuals that spend their spare time trying
programming a car to behave properly on track, has been slautgther.
Everything sucks. Steering, physics... everything. *** sim-ers
encourages ppl *not* to buy a product.
If I were the Wests. I'd give up on *** sim fans. They will never be
satisfied. The Wests may very well make the best sim ever made, but I bet
you $$$ that there will be a lot of critisism if this sim ever is to be
released. "Tire modelling isn't right", "Draft modelling is worse than
N2002", "there is a few graphical glitches", "Deadzone is bad", etc.
Why on earth would anyone with half a brain or more try to please the
*** sim-ers?? When did the *** sim-ers give any positive feedback
on anything? Try to please the *** sim-er, and you will get flamed
heavily.
Arcade racers. That's where the money is - if there is any money in games
involving driving. As long as they can keep on track without braking or
letting go of the gas pedal, and AI arent competitable, ppl preferring
arcade racers are satisfied. Any game will do. The *** sim-er chops the
head of anyone trying to do a proper sim.
Badmouthing is easy. Presenting constructive critisism is harder. I guess
most of us should practise more on the latter. That would be of benefit to
all sim eacers.
Jon Andersen