rec.autos.simulators

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

The Excelsi

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by The Excelsi » Thu, 17 Jun 1999 04:00:00



>Again, as I said, there's no reason a braking indicator couldn't be
>included in GPL as an aid for on-line racing.  It's not 100% accurate,
>but if you think you can achieve that sitting in a desk chair watching
>a monitor, then more power to you.  

You're missing the point!

First of all, calm down and breath in for a moment.

You're saying that since these aids, such as ABS brakes, were included
in Viper Racing, there is no reason why GPL couldn't have a braking
indicator as an aid too.

What I am saying is that it is OK for games like SCGT and Viper Racing
to not be _entirely_ realistic with things like these, as they both
share arcade and simulator qualities. GPL however is all about pure
simulation of the real thing, without diddly squat of an arcade feel,
and for this, brake lights should _not_ be included, or built in, as
this would take away from the authenticity.

Of course not! That's like saying that since computers like the ones
we have today weren't around in the 60's, we shouldn't own GPL at all!

I don't. I grave realism from a computer!

Actually, if you'd care to look over past messages, I never said that
brake lights wouldn't be helpful for on-line racing. It's a fact that
they would. What I said was that these brake lights would take away
the realism, and the enjoyment which most GPLers enjoy. Especially the
good ones among us. :-)

Perhaps these people should practise a little more in training and
single race modes before going on-line? Accidents are _bound_ to
happen. There is little we can do to prevent them, even if you added
all of the aids mentioned in previous messages, pile-ups would still
happen. However, the very best way to prevent them is to know your car
well, and the best way to do I'm afraid is to practise.

You're talking about two entirely seperate issues! You need to stick
to the same conversation and finish it before moving onto something
else..

He put forward an excellent idea, not just a good one, but because
this idea conflicts with the whole reason for GPL, most of us would
say that it should not be implimented.

The Excelsior

"ICQ #40620378"

The Excelsi

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by The Excelsi » Thu, 17 Jun 1999 04:00:00



>>True, but these options hardly effect multiplayer races in the same
>>way that brake lights would on GPL cars...

>I pretty much guarantee you that a newbie using ABS set to the "high"
>level in Viper Racing is going to have at least some small advantage
>over the more seasoned player using no ABS at all.  THAT would seem to
>affect multiplayer races, I would think -- probably moreso than brake
>lights would, in fact.

Of course. However, it would be much easier to overtake somebody when
you can see when they are braking because a big red light flashes in
front of you, instead of just following the car up behind and hoping
that you're at the right speed, distance, and are actually watching
the car infront as it begins to brake.

This discussion over the pro's and con's doesn't really seem to be
_getting_ anywhere. I'm all for brake lights in GPL, AS LONG AS they
won't appear on my screen, so that I can stick to what I enjoy most -
the true racing!

The Excelsior

"ICQ #40620378"

John Bod

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by John Bod » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00





>>Again, as I said, there's no reason a braking indicator couldn't be
>>included in GPL as an aid for on-line racing.  It's not 100% accurate,
>>but if you think you can achieve that sitting in a desk chair watching
>>a monitor, then more power to you.  

>You're missing the point!

>First of all, calm down and breath in for a moment.

>You're saying that since these aids, such as ABS brakes, were included
>in Viper Racing, there is no reason why GPL couldn't have a braking
>indicator as an aid too.

>What I am saying is that it is OK for games like SCGT and Viper Racing
>to not be _entirely_ realistic with things like these, as they both
>share arcade and simulator qualities. GPL however is all about pure
>simulation of the real thing, without diddly squat of an arcade feel,
>and for this, brake lights should _not_ be included, or built in, as
>this would take away from the authenticity.

>>GPL itself is about simulating racing in a very pure period, just as
>>flight sims like Red Baron simulate air combat in a very pure period.
>>When it comes to on-line racing with GPL agains other human beings,
>>though, we're talking about REAL-LIFE competition in a simulated
>>environment across the Internet, usually via modem.  In the era
>>simulated by GPL, the Internet and modems DIDN'T EXIST -- so is the
>>inclusion of Internet play via modem unrealistic for GPL, and should
>>it be deleted?  

>Of course not! That's like saying that since computers like the ones
>we have today weren't around in the 60's, we shouldn't own GPL at all!

>>My point here is that you can take the "realism" and "authenticity"
>>arguments too far

>I don't. I grave realism from a computer!

>>and I think using the "realism" and "authenticity"
>>arguments in the debate about whether brake indicators would be
>>helpful for on-line racing is, well, going too far.

>Actually, if you'd care to look over past messages, I never said that
>brake lights wouldn't be helpful for on-line racing. It's a fact that
>they would. What I said was that these brake lights would take away
>the realism, and the enjoyment which most GPLers enjoy. Especially the
>good ones among us. :-)

Regarding the "realism" in GPL, consider this:  

In 1972, my father had his right eye removed due to cancer.  He
recovered fully, but he found that his lack of depth perception was a
real hindrance.  He found that simple things like driving nails,
driving screws, and even driving a car were suddenly things that he
could no longer do well because with only one eye and no real 3-D
depth perception, he just couldn't properly judge distances.  Try it
sometime -- cover one eye and try to do any of these things, and
you'll probably find that it's at least a little harder to work in a
2-D environment than it is with full 3-D vision and proper depth
perception.  

THIS is what you're dealing with in a simulation that only gives you
2-D images on a video monitor.  So every time you properly judge
closing distance in GPL, pat yourself on the back and congratulate
yourself, because you'll probably do just fine if you're ever left
with only one eye.  As for realism, though, GPL falls far short in the
visual category, regardless of how gorgeous and "realistic" the cars
and scenery look.  

GPL models a full 3-D environment, but it's presented to us in a 2-D
manner (i.e., a two-dimensional video display), and there's nothing
you can do on a standard monitor (short of a 3-D device like the
Eyescream glasses or such) to make it any more realistic.  Which means
that in the realm of GPL, we're all effectively one-eyed pirates.
Handicapped, if you will, much as my father was all those many years
ago.  So, given that, it would be nice if Papy had offered those of us
who don't do so well with only one eye the option of having some type
of braking indicator for the cars in front of us, to better help us
judge the distance in GPL's 2-D environment.  

Maybe my father could  have adapted with a little more practice, but
he realized that he was not as safe as he should be, and after trying
several times to drive after losing his eye, he quit driving for the
remainder of his years.  Without proper 3-D depth perception, he found
that even brake lights weren't enough to make him feel safe behind the
wheel.  Thank God that we're only risking simulated sheetmetal and
skin in GPL's 2-D environment, because there, we don't even have brake
lights.  My guess is that Graham Hill would have retired from racing
if he had ever been unfortunate enough to lose an eye, or to have his
3-D depth perception impaired in any way.  And yet, for the majority
of us, apparently, GPL's 2-D environment represents the ultimate in
"realism," and we don't want any help at all, thank you very much.
Brake lights?  Bah!  We're real men (and women)!

Go figure.

Sims like GPL run into real problems as they approach ultra-realism on
some points, mainly because no matter how "real" things are in the
simulated environment, the user is woefully isolated from what's
"really" happening in the sim.  We have two means of receiving
feedback from GPL currently:  Aurally (and thankfully, the sound in
GPL is stereophonic, just as in real life), and visually (which, as
I've pointed out, is only 2-D, definitely NOT as it is in real life
for most of us).  

As a simulation gets more realistic, the senses that CAN'T come into
play become more critical, yet there's usually NO way at all to convey
most of those sensations to the person at the controls.  Therefore,
it's even MORE critical to find ways to utilize the EXISTING feedback
methods (SIGHT and SOUND) to the fullest.  GPL uses sound in a good
manner to convey what's happing to the left, right, and also ahead and
behind to some degree, but there's nothing at all that can be done
about the 2-D vision thing.  This is why "aids" like braking
indicators are almost a necessity -- you're isolated enough from the
"real" action in GPL as it is, and given the level of realism that is
incorporated into GPL's physics model, braking indicators would be
more of a user interface enhancement than a "cheat" or an affront to
game's overall realism.  

On the other hand, there are those people who enjoy the concept of
cutting off their noses to spite their face.  Thankfully for the vast
majority of GPL users, this is all a moot point, because GPL does not
include any braking indicators, and I doubt that anything like this
will ever be added, and the sim's inherent "purity" and "realism" will
be retained, intact -- in its full 2-D glory --  forever.  Amen.

--- JB

- Show quoted text -

'John' Joao Sil

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by 'John' Joao Sil » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00

Hi Mike,

I was wondering if wouldn't mind posting in Text instead of HTML?

I noticed in the past your posts had that "virtual business card" thing at
the end in MIME or something, but the content of your posts were in text
and easily readable, but now it looks like your whole post is in MIME or HTML
or something which is very hard to read due to all the markup tags.

HTML posts come across pretty much as unreadable gobbledygook to those
of us who use traditional text USENET newsreaders like 'trn' or 'tin'
(as most of us longtime USENET ***s and UNIX users do).

Normally I ignore all HTML posts, but you are a good contributor to r.a.s.
(and a good racer from my past VROC races with you) so I want to keep
reading your contributions and thought you might want to know that your
post is pretty much unreadable to some of us and by posting in HTML many
of us will ignore your entire post.

Not trying to start a huge HTML -vs- Text on USENET flamefest, but there is
still a large amount of us old UNIX newsreader users who bypass any HTML
posts and your posts are some I would rather not have to ignore.

Thanks.

Seeyas on the track.

--John (Joao) Silva



SNIPPED lots more HTML gobbledygook!

Thom j

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by Thom j » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00

My cable works great & I have never had any down time!
Maybe you should change providers?? Thom_j.


> Wow.....I didn't expect this much "response" to what I considered an
"obvious"
> benefit.

> Cable internet connections are great....except when they don't work!  And
my
> cable operator has been "down" since Sunday afternoon....it just came back
up
> last night.  There's over 70 "replies" in this string alone....guess I
have some
> reading to do?

> I think I should "respond" when and where needed in a single post......to
save
> time and space.

> Be back in a couple hours.....lol.

> Tom Pabst


The Excelsi

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by The Excelsi » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00



>Not trying to start a huge HTML -vs- Text on USENET flamefest, but there is
>still a large amount of us old UNIX newsreader users who bypass any HTML
>posts and your posts are some I would rather not have to ignore.

It's not just Unix users who need to worry about HTML. HTML should not
be used in Usenet, period!

It takes longer to download and takes up more bandwidth, which means
that servers will be able to carry far less.

Not just that, but I shouldn't be forced to read a message in the font
which somebody else chooses. It should appear as _I_ like it - in my
case, Courier New is the best font!

The Excelsior

"Second star to the right, and straight on 'til morning..."
Captain James Kirk [William Shatner], The Undiscovered Country

The Excelsi

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by The Excelsi » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00


<THE BIGGEST SNIP YET!>

No offence intended, but please try to cut down on the size of your
mesages. There was no need for all the quoted text in your last
message!

I'm sorry to hear that...

I'm not denying that with one eye closed it wouldn't be difficult,
however a 2D monitor is not quite the same thing.

If what you say is accurate, why are some of us able to complete lap
after lap without crashing into every barrier? We see the corner
approaching, we slow down, we turn, we accelerate out of it. If we
weren't able to judge the corner, we wouldn't make it around the first
bend.

Couldn't agree more! The graphics in GPL are piss-poor! Those
cartoon-style buildings at Monaco, for example, look like they have
been drawn by my 7-year-old brother. And with those same old 2D trees
scattered around the place, there's little _special_ about the
graphics.

I must admit to being quite pleased with the special effects, such as
the smoke which comes up from your wheel when you skid or wheel spin,
and even the fire looks pretty stunning!

If you want Papyrus to take into account blind/visually impaired
people   (and I'm not saying they shouldn't...) then perhaps they
should also take into account the Dyslexic and use much larger fonts,
and the deaf with sharper sounds, and those with muscular disabilities
who find it difficult to use analogue controllers...

No! There are _many_ ways which GPL could be improved on, and over the
years, just as with every other one of its kind, GPL will become
obsolete, replaced by something bigger and better. However, for the
time being, GPL is the most realistic simulator available to us. That
does not mean it is _real_!

Just needed to be clear about that point.

We can certainly get close, especially with FF, 3D Sound, FF seats,
etc.

Tell me... do you think that GPL (which is doing its best to _copy_
the real F1 from 1967) would be MORE like the real F1 racing if it had
brake lights?

What do you think G.Hill would have to say about that?

The Excelsior

"Second star to the right, and straight on 'til morning..."
Captain James Kirk [William Shatner], The Undiscovered Country

Michael Barlo

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by Michael Barlo » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00

        I've been told this before many times. My reply?  GET A HTML READER!!
(just joking)

        I write monthly reports using HTML.  using it, the reports look a whole
lot better with useless picture incorporated then they do with just
three of four lines of text.

        Now that these posts are in text form, I wonder how many will even look
at the sponsors listed in my tag line, let alone how many will go to
these places and make me look good to them ;-)

Mike Barlow


> Hi Mike,

> I was wondering if wouldn't mind posting in Text instead of HTML?

> I noticed in the past your posts had that "virtual business card" thing at
> the end in MIME or something, but the content of your posts were in text
> and easily readable, but now it looks like your whole post is in MIME or HTML
> or something which is very hard to read due to all the markup tags.

> HTML posts come across pretty much as unreadable gobbledygook to those
> of us who use traditional text USENET newsreaders like 'trn' or 'tin'
> (as most of us longtime USENET ***s and UNIX users do).

> Normally I ignore all HTML posts, but you are a good contributor to r.a.s.
> (and a good racer from my past VROC races with you) so I want to keep
> reading your contributions and thought you might want to know that your
> post is pretty much unreadable to some of us and by posting in HTML many
> of us will ignore your entire post.

> Not trying to start a huge HTML -vs- Text on USENET flamefest, but there is
> still a large amount of us old UNIX newsreader users who bypass any HTML
> posts and your posts are some I would rather not have to ignore.

> Thanks.

> Seeyas on the track.

> --John (Joao) Silva



> >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> >--------------6855F6FDF9BCE7AB67D4BEB8
> >Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> ><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
> ><html>
> ><body text="#000000" bgcolor="#CCCCCC" link="#0000EE" vlink="#551A8B" alink="#FF0000">
> >&nbsp;

> SNIPPED lots more HTML gobbledygook!

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
=========================================
Member of R.O.R. 1999
http://www.racesimcentral.net/~marknjess/ror.html
=========================================
Racing online with the help of......

Sim Racing Mag
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Race Communications Association
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Holodyne Engineering

Mystic Music

(have Your !!Name/Address!! placed here)

  mikeba.vcf
< 1K Download
Michael Barlo

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by Michael Barlo » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00




> >Not trying to start a huge HTML -vs- Text on USENET flamefest, but there is
> >still a large amount of us old UNIX newsreader users who bypass any HTML
> >posts and your posts are some I would rather not have to ignore.

> It's not just Unix users who need to worry about HTML. HTML should not
> be used in Usenet, period!

> It takes longer to download and takes up more bandwidth, which means
> that servers will be able to carry far less.

        Sorry about that Ex! I got so used to a modem that actually has a fast
download as opposed to my old 33.6

        I can't stand courier fonts. But, to each, their own ;-)  I'm among
those idiots that has a very big monitor (21 inch w/19.7 view able) but
still uses 800X600.

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
=========================================
Member of R.O.R. 1999
http://www.pivot.net/~marknjess/ror.html
=========================================
Racing online with the help of......

Sim Racing Mag
http://www.simracingmag.com/

Race Communications Association
http://members.xoom.com/RCA/toc.html

Holodyne Engineering

Mystic Music

(have Your !!Name/Address!! placed here)

  mikeba.vcf
< 1K Download
Wolfgang Prei

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by Wolfgang Prei » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00


Same here. Please turn off that HTML stuff, Mike! Some years ago, I
tried to read *every* potentially interesting contribution on USENET,
but my tolerance for ill formatting has gone down considerably in the
meantime. These days, it's "hit the 'next' key" when I see a message
that's hard to read due to HTML, long lines or lack of whitespace.

It's hard to break with this habit even if the info in the message
might be vital. I almost dumped a hand-written letter from my
girlfriend: five sheets of hotel notes paper, not numbered, unreadable
handwriting on both sides of the leaves. If she wants me to read it,
she should type it legibly... ;) Well, mabe not the appropriate
attitude in this particular case, so I tried to decipher it anyway.
But *you* are *not* my girlfriend, Mike Barlow. :)

In a nutshell - if you want to be read by a lot of people, try to
format your writing in a human-readable manner.

--
Wolfgang Preiss   \ E-mail copies of replies to this posting are welcome.


The Excelsi

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by The Excelsi » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 11:21:43 -0400, Michael Barlow


>    Sorry about that Ex! I got so used to a modem that actually has a fast
>download as opposed to my old 33.6

It doesn't matter what speed YOU can download at, it matters what
speed other people can. Remember that some people still use 28k
modems...

And by using 800x600 you are insulting everybody with a 15" or 17"
screen I can think of. :-)

Why would you want to have such a terrible screen resolution with such
a large monitor?

The Excelsior

"Second star to the right, and straight on 'til morning..."
Captain James Kirk [William Shatner], The Undiscovered Country

The Excelsi

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by The Excelsi » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:50:56 -0400, Michael Barlow


>    I've been told this before many times. My reply?  GET A HTML READER!!
>(just joking)

I realise you were joking, but I would still like to point out that it
has very little to do with the news reader you use. HTML can be read
just fin by OE, for example, but that still doesn't mean one should be
using HTML.

HTML is fine (in fact, it's encouraged) for mail-to-mail transfer, but
not for Usenet!

The Excelsior

"Second star to the right, and straight on 'til morning..."
Captain James Kirk [William Shatner], The Undiscovered Country

The Excelsi

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by The Excelsi » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00



>Same here. Please turn off that HTML stuff, Mike! Some years ago, I
>tried to read *every* potentially interesting contribution on USENET,
>but my tolerance for ill formatting has gone down considerably in the
>meantime. These days, it's "hit the 'next' key" when I see a message
>that's hard to read due to HTML, long lines or lack of whitespace.

You are kidding? You were willing to go through thousands upon
thousands upon thousands of newsgroups, and millions of messages? Talk
about free time!

Or was this at a time when Usenet wasn't as common, and as popular, as
it is today?

I received a letter similar to that recently. It was almost impossible
to tell where one page finished and another began! Grrrrrr!

The Excelsior

"Second star to the right, and straight on 'til morning..."
Captain James Kirk [William Shatner], The Undiscovered Country

Byron Forbe

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by Byron Forbe » Fri, 18 Jun 1999 04:00:00

    You guys got video conferencing?

> Sorry for the confusion but you never >>>>>stared<<<<<<< anything specifically. I made
> an assumption that you was on about this, following on from the previous
> post ;-)

John Bod

Brake Lights For Online Racing - GPL

by John Bod » Sat, 19 Jun 1999 04:00:00





><THE BIGGEST SNIP YET!>

Whew!  Thanks for shortening things -- it WAS getting a bit
cumbersome! <G>

Thanks.  Even before the operation, Dad and I didn't really see
eye-to-eye on all issues, and it only got worse afterwards . . . ;-)

(Hey, you've gotta laugh about these things or they'll kill you!)

I'd say that maybe it's because some people are better able to adapt
to the lack of input from the missing senses that usually receive
input when actually behind the wheel.  Others, though, may be
operating on a somewhat-impaired level without those inputs, and the
addition of "interface aids" like braking indicators would help level
things out for them -- it's not always a case of someone not
practicing enough.  Some people just can't adapt as well to the sim
environment -- I know real racers that I can drive rings around in a
sim, no matter how much practice they've had.  Obviously, something's
missing for them in the sim interface.  

- Show quoted text -

I know -- I got carried away and nearly fell off my soapbox.  Sorry
about that.

- Show quoted text -

No, but with the OPTION for some sort of braking indicator, it might
be a better on-line racing EXPERIENCE for a BROADER AUDIENCE, which
just might increase its mass appeal.  THAT would be the beauty of
braking indicators, and if you could choose NOT to use them, and I
could choose TO use them, then we both might be able to compete on a
more level playing field given more diverse abilities, and everybody
would come out ahead, right?  

How about this:  "***y good thing!  Now I can tell more easily when
the bloke in front of me is braking too early!" <G>

- Show quoted text -


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.